18.01.2015 Views

Gracial ProdMonograph_cover - epgonline.org

Gracial ProdMonograph_cover - epgonline.org

Gracial ProdMonograph_cover - epgonline.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Safety aspects<br />

Table 5: Relative risk estimates for VTE for different exposures compared<br />

with non-use or second-generation OC use<br />

Current exposure Reference group Odds ratio 95% CI<br />

All OCs No current use 2.9 2.1-4.1<br />

1st generation OCs No current use 8.5 3.0-23.9<br />

2nd generation OCs No current use 2.9 1.9-4.2<br />

Levon<strong>org</strong>estrel OCs No current use 2.6 1.8-4.0<br />

N<strong>org</strong>estimate OCs No current use 3.7 2.2-6.1<br />

3rd generation OCs No current use 2.3 1.5-3.5<br />

Desogestrel/30 EE OCs No current use 2.5 1.6-4.1<br />

Gestodene OCs No current use 2.3 1.4-3.6<br />

Desogestrel/20 EE OCs No current use 1.6 0.9-2.9<br />

3rd generation OCs 2nd generation OCs 0.8 0.5-1.3<br />

(Lewis et al 1999)<br />

Conclusion<br />

It can be concluded that after appropriate adjustments for<br />

relevant confounders and distorting factors, the risk of VTE is<br />

similar for OCs containing the same estrogen doses,<br />

irrespective of the progestogen component.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!