Gracial ProdMonograph_cover - epgonline.org
Gracial ProdMonograph_cover - epgonline.org
Gracial ProdMonograph_cover - epgonline.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Safety aspects<br />
Table 5: Relative risk estimates for VTE for different exposures compared<br />
with non-use or second-generation OC use<br />
Current exposure Reference group Odds ratio 95% CI<br />
All OCs No current use 2.9 2.1-4.1<br />
1st generation OCs No current use 8.5 3.0-23.9<br />
2nd generation OCs No current use 2.9 1.9-4.2<br />
Levon<strong>org</strong>estrel OCs No current use 2.6 1.8-4.0<br />
N<strong>org</strong>estimate OCs No current use 3.7 2.2-6.1<br />
3rd generation OCs No current use 2.3 1.5-3.5<br />
Desogestrel/30 EE OCs No current use 2.5 1.6-4.1<br />
Gestodene OCs No current use 2.3 1.4-3.6<br />
Desogestrel/20 EE OCs No current use 1.6 0.9-2.9<br />
3rd generation OCs 2nd generation OCs 0.8 0.5-1.3<br />
(Lewis et al 1999)<br />
Conclusion<br />
It can be concluded that after appropriate adjustments for<br />
relevant confounders and distorting factors, the risk of VTE is<br />
similar for OCs containing the same estrogen doses,<br />
irrespective of the progestogen component.<br />
32