18.01.2015 Views

Gracial ProdMonograph_cover - epgonline.org

Gracial ProdMonograph_cover - epgonline.org

Gracial ProdMonograph_cover - epgonline.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Safety aspects<br />

On balance, this study is very reassuring. The finding that use<br />

of the Pill does not increase the overall lifetime risk of breast<br />

cancer is very positive, as is the fact that breast cancer in<br />

users or former users of OCs is less likely to have metastasized<br />

at the time of diagnosis. The risk of having breast cancer<br />

diagnosed is slightly increased in current users of the Pill, but<br />

not in those who used an OC 10 years ago. This suggests that<br />

the Pill does not initiate cancer of the breast because the risk<br />

of cancer following exposure to known carcinogens depends<br />

upon the amount and overall duration of exposure and not<br />

upon the length of time elapsed since exposure. It has been<br />

hypothesized that the increased risk of breast cancer in<br />

current users could reflect a higher likelihood of diagnosis as a<br />

result of more frequent professional surveillance and selfexamination<br />

in Pill users. Alternatively, the Pill may be acting<br />

as a promoter of pre-existing breast cancer, thereby advancing<br />

the time at which it becomes clinically detectable (but<br />

conversely reducing its tendency to metastasize). It is not<br />

possible to infer from these epidemiological data whether the<br />

observed relation between breast-cancer risk and OCs is due<br />

to an earlier diagnosis of breast cancer in ever-users, the<br />

biological effects of OCs or a combination of reasons.<br />

Confirmation from experimental studies is necessary.<br />

OC use and<br />

cervical cancer<br />

OC use and<br />

ovarian cancer<br />

Cervical, ovarian and endometrial cancer<br />

The relationship between cervical cancer and OC use is still<br />

inconclusive. Although a slightly elevated risk of cervical<br />

cancer has been reported with OC use (Brinton 1991;<br />

Zondervan et al 1996), it is difficult to adjust for the<br />

confounder of sexual activity, as having multiple partners is a<br />

known risk factor for cervical cancer.<br />

A study by Stanford (1991), investigating the risk of epithelial<br />

ovarian cancer with OC use, showed that in women who have<br />

ever used an oral contraceptive, the risk of ovarian cancer was<br />

reduced by 30%. In addition, five or more years of use was<br />

associated with a 50% reduction in risk. This protective effect<br />

persisted for ten years or more after beginning use of OCs.<br />

A second investigation confirmed this finding (Vessey and<br />

Painter 1995). In comparison with never-users, the relative<br />

risk of ovarian and endometrial cancer in users of OCs was<br />

0.4 (95% CI 0.2–0.8) and 0.1 (95% CI 0.0–0.7), respectively.<br />

There was also a strong negative relationship between the<br />

duration of oral contraceptive use and ovarian-cancer risk, i.e.<br />

in comparison with never-users, the relative risk in users of<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!