Technical Risk Assessment Handbook - Defence Science and ...
Technical Risk Assessment Handbook - Defence Science and ...
Technical Risk Assessment Handbook - Defence Science and ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
40<br />
Annex D<br />
Potential considerations in <strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong><br />
This section describes some considerations that may help identify potential risk<br />
events. These considerations are listed in terms of:<br />
• development projects <strong>and</strong> acquisition strategy;<br />
• platform project; <strong>and</strong><br />
• the software component of a project.<br />
While the considerations are listed separately in these sections, it is possible that a<br />
project will draw technical risk events from each of these categories.<br />
The material below is drawn from ‘<strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong>: a Practitioner’s<br />
Guide’, J. O’Neill, N. Thakur <strong>and</strong> A. Duus, DSTO-GD-0493, 2007, with some small<br />
modifications.<br />
A development project/acquisition strategy considerations<br />
1. Is the proposed project approach technically sound Will the technology work as<br />
specified in the required timeframe Is the maturity of the technology a time <strong>and</strong><br />
money issue, are there fundamental research breakthroughs required, or are<br />
there scaling or architectural issues<br />
2. What is the confidence that the project will run to completion Does the<br />
contractor(s) have the resources <strong>and</strong> expertise to successfully deliver the<br />
contract<br />
3. If the project relies on a technology process (eg structural refurbishment), what<br />
confidence do we have that an Australian contractor (if involved) will be able to<br />
run the technology process to completion What confidence do we have that the<br />
technology process will take the same amount of time when conducted by an<br />
Australian contractor on ADF platforms (with potentially different fatigue issues)<br />
compared with similar overseas processes What is the impact on capability <strong>and</strong><br />
schedule as a consequence of any uncertainty with the implementation of this<br />
technology process<br />
4. Are there any technical reasons why the proposed options will not meet<br />
Australian capability requirements<br />
5. What are the integration risks for the options working in the Australian<br />
environment<br />
6. Are there any certification issues involved in the options Will Australia be<br />
accepting the ‘first of type’ <strong>and</strong> if so what issues need to be addressed What is<br />
the trade-off between moving down the production line <strong>and</strong> allowing another<br />
country to bear many of the certification risks versus the delays into service from<br />
a capability perspective<br />
<strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> Version 1.1