18.01.2015 Views

Walking and Cycling International Literature Review - Department of ...

Walking and Cycling International Literature Review - Department of ...

Walking and Cycling International Literature Review - Department of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Citation Mode Issue Lit. Type Study Density Sample Outcome Variable(s) Key Findings<br />

Lee <strong>and</strong><br />

Moudon<br />

(2006a)<br />

Ped Model Peer<br />

rev.<br />

Not<br />

Specified<br />

Telephone survey <strong>of</strong> 608 adults in King County,<br />

WA, sampled using a spatial sampling strategy.<br />

Frequency <strong>and</strong><br />

duration <strong>of</strong> weekly<br />

walking; Frequency<br />

<strong>and</strong> duration <strong>of</strong><br />

walking for:<br />

commuting,<br />

shopping, <strong>and</strong><br />

recreation<br />

• “Distance measures to routine daily destinations are shown to be simple <strong>and</strong><br />

effective alternatives to complicated composite measures <strong>of</strong>ten used to capture<br />

l<strong>and</strong> use mix <strong>and</strong> street connectivity” (pg. 204).<br />

• Destinations, distance, density, <strong>and</strong> route... “Together, these environmental<br />

variables captured slightly over 10% <strong>of</strong> the variations in explaining walking in both<br />

final models. This is significant because the 10% is an independent contribution<br />

after controlling for the socio-demographic confounders <strong>and</strong> even the perceived<br />

environmental variables” (pg. 212).<br />

Lee <strong>and</strong><br />

Moudon<br />

(2006b)<br />

Ped Comm.<br />

des.<br />

Peer<br />

rev.<br />

Big city 438 adult respondents from Seattle, WA to a<br />

telephone survey in 2002.<br />

Walker status;<br />

Transportation walk<br />

trips/week;<br />

Recreation walk trips/<br />

week<br />

• “Utilitarian destinations were positively associated with transportation walking, but<br />

recreational destinations were not associated with any walking. Residential density<br />

was correlated with both purposes <strong>of</strong> walking, <strong>and</strong> sidewalks with recreation<br />

walking only. Hills were positively associated with recreation walking <strong>and</strong> negatively<br />

with transportation walking” (pg. S77).<br />

• “Route-related variables, such as block size, traffic volume, sidewalk <strong>and</strong> street<br />

trees, did not show a statistically significant association with transportation<br />

walking; but longer sidewalks was positively associated with recreation walking”<br />

(pg. S90).<br />

Levine <strong>and</strong><br />

Frank (2007)<br />

Both Comm.<br />

des.<br />

Peer<br />

rev.<br />

Crosssec.<br />

Crosssec.<br />

Crosssec.<br />

Metro<br />

area<br />

1,455 r<strong>and</strong>omly selected households <strong>of</strong> metro<br />

Atlanta participated in a stated-preference<br />

survey in 2001/2002.<br />

Index <strong>of</strong> desired<br />

degree <strong>of</strong><br />

neighbourhood<br />

change<br />

• “The study provides evidence that the segment <strong>of</strong> the housing market that is<br />

interested in these alternatives is underserved--that is, there is unmet dem<strong>and</strong> for<br />

alternative development in the Atlanta region” (pg. 272).<br />

Li et al. (2005a) Ped Comm.<br />

des.<br />

Peer<br />

rev.<br />

Longit. Big city 582 senior residents in 56 Portl<strong>and</strong>, OR<br />

neighbourhoods were surveyed in 2001.<br />

Neighbourhood<br />

walking in last 12<br />

months as selfreported<br />

on likert<br />

scale<br />

• “Results indicated a significant neighbourhood effect, with neighbourhood-level<br />

walking characterized by a downward trajectory over time” (pg. 145).<br />

• “neighbourhoods with safety <strong>of</strong> neighbourhood walking <strong>and</strong> greater access to<br />

physical activity facilities tended to show less decline (i.e., smaller rates <strong>of</strong> decline)<br />

in walking activity over the four assessment points” (pg. 155).<br />

Li et al. (2005b) Ped Comm.<br />

des.<br />

Peer<br />

rev.<br />

Crosssec.<br />

Big city 577 older adults in 56 Portl<strong>and</strong>, OR<br />

neighbourhoods participated in the survey.<br />

Neighbourhood<br />

walking in last 12<br />

months as selfreported<br />

on likert<br />

scale<br />

• “A positive relation was found between built environment factors (density <strong>of</strong> places<br />

<strong>of</strong> employment, household density, green <strong>and</strong> open spaces for recreation, number<br />

<strong>of</strong> street intersections) <strong>and</strong> walking activity at the neighbourhood level. At the<br />

resident level, perceptions <strong>of</strong> safety for walking <strong>and</strong> number <strong>of</strong> nearby recreational<br />

facilities were positively related to high levels <strong>of</strong> walking activity. A significant<br />

interaction was observed between number <strong>of</strong> street intersections <strong>and</strong> perceptions<br />

<strong>of</strong> safety from traffic” (pg. 558).<br />

Lindsey <strong>and</strong><br />

Nguyen (2004)<br />

Both Infra. Peer<br />

rev.<br />

Not<br />

Specified<br />

Data were collected on five Indiana trails in<br />

2000 <strong>and</strong> at five locations along an Indianapolis<br />

trail in 2001.<br />

Bicycle traffic counts:<br />

monthly, average<br />

daily, weekday,<br />

weekend, average<br />

hourly, <strong>and</strong> peak hour<br />

traffic<br />

• “Trail traffic was higher in municipalities with larger populations <strong>and</strong> higher on<br />

weekend days than on weekdays. Peak hour traffic accounted for higher<br />

proportions <strong>of</strong> traffic on weekdays than on weekend days. Traffic at different<br />

locations on one trail in Indianapolis varied considerably” (pg. 213).<br />

• “The percentage <strong>of</strong> users who said they use the trails for commuting ranged from<br />

essentially zero to approximately 5%” (pg. 216).<br />

Lindsey et al.<br />

(2006)<br />

Both Comm.<br />

des.<br />

Peer<br />

rev.<br />

Big city Infrared monitors were used to measure traffic<br />

at 30 locations on five trails in Indianapolis, IN.<br />

Daily counts <strong>of</strong> trail<br />

users<br />

• “Trail traffic correlates positively <strong>and</strong> significantly with income, neighbourhood<br />

population density, education, percent <strong>of</strong> neighbourhood in commercial use,<br />

vegetative health, area <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong> in parking, <strong>and</strong> mean length <strong>of</strong> street segments in<br />

access networks” (S139).<br />

Lovejoy et al.<br />

(2006)<br />

Ped Comm.<br />

des.<br />

Conf.<br />

p.<br />

Crosssec.<br />

Modelling<br />

Crosssec.<br />

Not<br />

Specified<br />

1,682 people (784 from suburban<br />

neighbourhoods <strong>and</strong> 898 from traditional<br />

neighbourhoods) in Northern California were<br />

surveyed in 2003.<br />

Avg. VMT/week; Avg.<br />

number <strong>of</strong> walks in<br />

the n'hood in 30 days;<br />

# <strong>of</strong> walks to local<br />

shopping in the last<br />

30 days<br />

• Four types <strong>of</strong> mismatched residents: suburban mismatched on accessibility,<br />

attractiveness, <strong>and</strong> socializing aspects; traditional mismatched on safety aspects.<br />

• “We find evidence <strong>of</strong> accessibility-unsatisfied residents driving less than other<br />

suburban residents, statistically as little as traditional residents, suggesting that<br />

people who want to drive less can, even if living in a suburban neighbourhood”<br />

(pg. 11).<br />

WALKING AND CYCLING LITERATURE REVIEW FINAL REPORT 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!