Product Sensory Evaluation for Claim Support - Sensory Spectrum
Product Sensory Evaluation for Claim Support - Sensory Spectrum
Product Sensory Evaluation for Claim Support - Sensory Spectrum
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Product</strong> <strong>Sensory</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Support</strong><br />
Pamela J. Zupkosky<br />
P&G Gillette<br />
Boston, MA USA
Agenda<br />
• Overview of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Legal and Regulatory Requirements<br />
• <strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical<br />
<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation Approach
What is a <strong>Claim</strong><br />
• <strong>Claim</strong>: Any communication about<br />
a product that consumers are likely<br />
to interpret as fact
Why Do We Need <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Advertising claims enables “us” to<br />
communicate the benefits of our<br />
products to consumers.
Where Do <strong>Claim</strong>s Exist<br />
• Advertising guidelines apply to all<br />
communications to the public about our products,<br />
including:<br />
– Packaging Copy<br />
– Sales and Press Materials<br />
– Print advertising<br />
– Floor displays<br />
– Transmitted media, including:<br />
• web sites<br />
• Television<br />
• Radio<br />
– Press Materials<br />
• <strong>Claim</strong>s can exist in any communication vehicle<br />
• All claims must be substantiated
Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
(Some cannot be used in some countries)<br />
• Monadic or Per<strong>for</strong>mance Statement<br />
• Comparative – Superiority or Parity<br />
• New and Improved<br />
• Demonstrations or Dramatizations<br />
• Drawings and Pictures<br />
• Consumer Statements, Testimonials &<br />
Endorsements<br />
• Ingredients or Content Statements<br />
• Drug <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Guarantees<br />
• Questions / Insights<br />
• Puffery
Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Monadic <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
– Statements of product per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
Implied comparison is with product<br />
vs. without product<br />
– Depending on the legal environment,<br />
they may be supported with<br />
consumer data, technical data, and/or<br />
technical rationale.<br />
• e.g.. Makes hair shiny, leaves legs<br />
smooth, protects from the sun
Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Comparative<br />
– Comparison of products on<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
– Superiority or parity<br />
– Can be internally against “self” or<br />
against other brands<br />
• e.g.. Better protection, makes hair<br />
shinier, shaves closer, skin is smoother,<br />
the best…
Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• “New” and “Improved” <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
– An entirely new product…..<br />
– Or a substantial change in product<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
– Without clarification, “improved”<br />
implies referral to the primary<br />
benefit.<br />
– These claims are typically limited (6<br />
month duration in North America)
Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Demos<br />
– Demonstrations are claims of per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
• They can be monadic or side by side<br />
comparisons<br />
– When using demos, expect to ‘super’ some<br />
disclosure or use the word “dramatization”<br />
• e.g.. Elapsed time, number of usage cycles <strong>for</strong><br />
be<strong>for</strong>e vs. after demos<br />
– Must reflect true mechanism of action
Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Testimonials and Endorsements<br />
– Consumer’s opinions become claims<br />
if they are used in advertising.<br />
– Professional endorsements usually<br />
have a higher level of claims support<br />
required.<br />
• The advertiser must be able to<br />
independently support what the<br />
person has to say.
•Celebrity endorsement<br />
•Superiority<br />
•Guarantee<br />
Beckham / M3Power
Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Ingredient <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
– A “signal” ingredient is acceptable as<br />
long as the product <strong>for</strong>mula as a<br />
whole delivers on the claim<br />
– If a benefit is directly attributed to a<br />
specific ingredient, you must have<br />
data to show that ingredient provides<br />
the benefit at the level used in the<br />
product.
Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Drug <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
– Any claim of altering either the structure or<br />
function of the body is a drug claim<br />
• e.g. Stimulates the scalp<br />
– Any claim of prevention, treatment or cure<br />
of a disease state is a drug claim<br />
• e.g. prevents dandruff, maximum anti-perspirant<br />
protection<br />
– Every drug claim needs prior approval from<br />
the FDA
•Drug <strong>Claim</strong><br />
•Celebrity Endorsement<br />
Right Guard
Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Guarantees<br />
– Must be true and supported<br />
– Must comply with local law regarding<br />
disclosures<br />
– Guarantees are in the name of the brand<br />
itself and not directly on behalf of the<br />
Company.<br />
• Questions can be claims<br />
– e.g. Does your product keep your<br />
underarms dry<br />
• Insights can be claims<br />
– e.g. Did you know – when you have a bad<br />
shave......
Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
• Puffery<br />
– Applies to only those statements so<br />
obviously an exaggeration that<br />
consumers won’t interpret as a literal<br />
statement of fact.
•Superiority<br />
•Demonstration<br />
Breakthrough
Legal and Regulatory<br />
Requirements
Where Does the Substantiation<br />
Data Go<br />
• The substantiation <strong>for</strong> a claim must be<br />
assembled prior to publication of that<br />
claim in accordance with local standards<br />
• In most countries, truthful and<br />
substantiated advertising is required by<br />
law.<br />
– Different views on what sort of claim can even<br />
be made<br />
– Different views on level of proof required<br />
• (Consumer data, Instrumental data, Clinical data)<br />
– Different views on what constitutes proper<br />
substantiation
Where Does the Substantiation<br />
Data Go<br />
• After publication, the data may need to<br />
be disclosed:<br />
– In response to a competitive challenge<br />
• Direct discussion<br />
• Litigation<br />
• Regulatory complaint procedure<br />
– In response to an inquiry from a regulatory<br />
body<br />
• Be very careful with data generation, as<br />
it is all discoverable in a litigation<br />
situation.
Advertising Review Agencies<br />
• There are a variety of external<br />
advertising review agencies globally.<br />
The agencies are made up of a<br />
combination of government and private<br />
organizations.<br />
• These agencies are responsible <strong>for</strong><br />
reviewing advertising <strong>for</strong> truthfulness<br />
and providing protection <strong>for</strong> the<br />
consumer.
Advertising Review Agencies<br />
• United States:<br />
• Substantiation data may be required as part<br />
of pre-clearance <strong>for</strong>:<br />
– network TV<br />
– network radio<br />
– print advertising (e.g., Good<br />
Housekeeping)<br />
• EU:<br />
• Substantiation <strong>for</strong> cosmetic product claims<br />
must be included in “PIP”<br />
• TV pre-clearance process:<br />
– UK - BACC (Broadcast Advertising Clearance<br />
Centre)<br />
– France - BVP (Bureau de Vérification de la<br />
Publicité)
Legal Challenge<br />
• False claims or claims that are not supported<br />
can expose legal actions, and result in<br />
negative public relations consequences….<br />
– Prohibition from further use of the claim<br />
– <strong>for</strong> pack copy<br />
• Repackage<br />
• Over-sticker<br />
• Mask over claim<br />
– Costly! <strong>Claim</strong>s challenges require valuable<br />
resources to respond and defend.<br />
– Loss of credibility: cascade effect elsewhere
The <strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical<br />
<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation Approach
<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation<br />
• What constitutes a method of claims<br />
substantiation <br />
– In the US, Consumer Use Tests (CUTs)<br />
are a generally accepted means of<br />
substantiating a claim (consumer<br />
perceivable attributes)<br />
– Instrumental Methods and Protocols<br />
– <strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical Methods and Protocols<br />
• Can be a combination of methods or a<br />
single method
<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation<br />
• In many countries, CUT data,<br />
standing alone, is not generally<br />
accepted as sufficient to<br />
substantiate a claim<br />
– These countries require “Objective”<br />
data<br />
• Instrumental Methods and Protocols<br />
• <strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical Methods and Protocols
<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation<br />
Strategy<br />
• Objective: Capitalize on consumer experience<br />
with products and understanding of technologies<br />
to identify and objectively measure signals /<br />
attributes<br />
– Understand Consumer Experience<br />
– Understand signals and use the appropriate<br />
methodology<br />
– Understand Physiology and its impact<br />
• e.g. Skin and Hair<br />
• Result: Determine the appropriate approach or<br />
combination of approaches to measure pertinent<br />
signals / attributes
<strong>Claim</strong>s Strategy<br />
In<br />
Vitro<br />
Laboratory<br />
Objective measures<br />
Quick and relatively inexpensive<br />
Must be Relevant / validated<br />
Links to final per<strong>for</strong>mance understood<br />
Combine these<br />
approaches to provide<br />
an appropriate<br />
package of data to<br />
support the claim<br />
Assess<br />
<strong>Claim</strong><br />
User<br />
Study<br />
<strong>Claim</strong>s<br />
<strong>Support</strong><br />
Package<br />
Establish need<br />
Understand target users<br />
Define approach<br />
In<br />
Vivo<br />
Home use (use & abuse)<br />
Appropriate population<br />
Confirm perception of per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />
Trained assessors<br />
Controlled<br />
Blind<br />
Instrumental / observational measures<br />
Self Assessment
Understanding the Desired <strong>Sensory</strong><br />
Experience (an example)<br />
• Background:<br />
– The business was interested in developing a<br />
product <strong>for</strong> women that fulfilled an unmet<br />
skin benefit need.<br />
– The development team was looking <strong>for</strong><br />
guidance in developing their Ideal <strong>Product</strong><br />
Model and advertising concept.
Understanding the Desired <strong>Sensory</strong><br />
Experience<br />
What sensory<br />
characteristics<br />
are desired<br />
by consumers<br />
How do you translate<br />
the desired sensory<br />
characteristics into<br />
measurable<br />
attributes
Identifying Desirable <strong>Sensory</strong><br />
Characteristics<br />
– Consumers have a difficult time describing what<br />
they want from a product.<br />
– When consumers can experience<br />
(see/feel/smell/taste/hear) products, they will<br />
provide more meaningful feedback <strong>for</strong> product<br />
development.<br />
– Creative ways to talk about our products can be<br />
gained from this consumer feedback.<br />
• “I love the way this makes my skin feel, I feel like I just<br />
moisturized!”<br />
• “This is too sticky!”<br />
• “Should smell like this!”
Signals and Sensations Associated With<br />
Desirable Skin<br />
Absence of Negatives
<strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical Testing<br />
• What is important to the consumer<br />
– Develop consumer vocabulary representing<br />
signals and sensations associated with the<br />
needs and fulfillment of benefits<br />
– Develop attributes that are measurable by<br />
consumer testing, instrumental testing,<br />
clinical testing, or a combination of tests.<br />
• How do we measure the benefits<br />
– Develop methods to measure the signals and<br />
sensations<br />
– Ensure that you are measuring the right thing<br />
• Develop integrated signals<br />
• Develop individual signals from complex terms
Translation of consumer desires into<br />
<strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical attributes<br />
• Recruit and train a Descriptive Analysis Panel,<br />
and / or….<br />
• Trained judges evaluate the sensory properties on<br />
a panel of consumers<br />
• Develop “measurable” attributes based on<br />
consumer signals and sensations<br />
– Visual attributes<br />
– Tactile attributes<br />
– Inherent physiological response<br />
• stinging, burning, soreness, tug and pull
Translation of consumer desires into<br />
<strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical attributes<br />
• Benefits of Methodology:<br />
– When instrumental methods are not<br />
sensitive enough<br />
– When instruments cannot measure<br />
the signal<br />
– When additional evidence (objective)<br />
is needed
Example: Descriptive Analysis<br />
4<br />
3.5<br />
<strong>Product</strong> 1<br />
<strong>Product</strong> 2<br />
3<br />
B<br />
B<br />
2.5<br />
B<br />
B<br />
2<br />
1.5<br />
1<br />
A<br />
B B B<br />
A<br />
A A<br />
A<br />
A<br />
B<br />
A<br />
B<br />
A<br />
A<br />
0.5<br />
0<br />
Attribute 1 Attribute 2 Attribute 3 Attribute 4 Attribute 5 Attribute 6 Attribute 7 Attribute 8 Attribute 9<br />
Within an attribute,<br />
samples with the<br />
same letter<br />
annotation are not<br />
significantly<br />
different from each<br />
other<br />
p < 0.05
<strong>Product</strong> Benefits<br />
• By understanding the signals and sensations<br />
consumers notice and developing an objective<br />
measurement tool, we were able to:<br />
– Link product function to its impact on the<br />
body<br />
– Develop appropriate products<br />
– Measure the correct signals<br />
– Identify a process to evaluate potential<br />
technical solutions<br />
– Develop a vocabulary to describe the<br />
product<br />
– Provide meaningful, objective, claim<br />
support
The <strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical<br />
<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation Approach<br />
Strategic Outcomes:<br />
• Introduction of sensory criteria <strong>for</strong> Advertising<br />
<strong>Claim</strong> Substantiation<br />
• <strong>Sensory</strong> replaces instrumental methods that<br />
cannot detect the perceived effects of the<br />
product<br />
• <strong>Sensory</strong> replaces instrumental methods when<br />
there are no instrumental measures<br />
• <strong>Claim</strong>s review boards accept the ‘sensory only’<br />
claims
<strong>Claim</strong> Substantiation Strategy<br />
<strong>Product</strong><br />
-Ingredient Level<br />
-<strong>Product</strong> Type<br />
Protocol<br />
-Level of Substantiation<br />
-Sensitivity<br />
<strong>Claim</strong><br />
-Wording<br />
Signal<br />
-What do we measure<br />
Measurement<br />
Tool<br />
-Measure the correct signal(s)<br />
-Combinations of techniques<br />
-Sensitivity
Thank You!