18.01.2015 Views

Product Sensory Evaluation for Claim Support - Sensory Spectrum

Product Sensory Evaluation for Claim Support - Sensory Spectrum

Product Sensory Evaluation for Claim Support - Sensory Spectrum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>Sensory</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>Claim</strong> <strong>Support</strong><br />

Pamela J. Zupkosky<br />

P&G Gillette<br />

Boston, MA USA


Agenda<br />

• Overview of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Legal and Regulatory Requirements<br />

• <strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical<br />

<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation Approach


What is a <strong>Claim</strong><br />

• <strong>Claim</strong>: Any communication about<br />

a product that consumers are likely<br />

to interpret as fact


Why Do We Need <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Advertising claims enables “us” to<br />

communicate the benefits of our<br />

products to consumers.


Where Do <strong>Claim</strong>s Exist<br />

• Advertising guidelines apply to all<br />

communications to the public about our products,<br />

including:<br />

– Packaging Copy<br />

– Sales and Press Materials<br />

– Print advertising<br />

– Floor displays<br />

– Transmitted media, including:<br />

• web sites<br />

• Television<br />

• Radio<br />

– Press Materials<br />

• <strong>Claim</strong>s can exist in any communication vehicle<br />

• All claims must be substantiated


Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

(Some cannot be used in some countries)<br />

• Monadic or Per<strong>for</strong>mance Statement<br />

• Comparative – Superiority or Parity<br />

• New and Improved<br />

• Demonstrations or Dramatizations<br />

• Drawings and Pictures<br />

• Consumer Statements, Testimonials &<br />

Endorsements<br />

• Ingredients or Content Statements<br />

• Drug <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Guarantees<br />

• Questions / Insights<br />

• Puffery


Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Monadic <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

– Statements of product per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Implied comparison is with product<br />

vs. without product<br />

– Depending on the legal environment,<br />

they may be supported with<br />

consumer data, technical data, and/or<br />

technical rationale.<br />

• e.g.. Makes hair shiny, leaves legs<br />

smooth, protects from the sun


Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Comparative<br />

– Comparison of products on<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

– Superiority or parity<br />

– Can be internally against “self” or<br />

against other brands<br />

• e.g.. Better protection, makes hair<br />

shinier, shaves closer, skin is smoother,<br />

the best…


Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• “New” and “Improved” <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

– An entirely new product…..<br />

– Or a substantial change in product<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

– Without clarification, “improved”<br />

implies referral to the primary<br />

benefit.<br />

– These claims are typically limited (6<br />

month duration in North America)


Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Demos<br />

– Demonstrations are claims of per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

• They can be monadic or side by side<br />

comparisons<br />

– When using demos, expect to ‘super’ some<br />

disclosure or use the word “dramatization”<br />

• e.g.. Elapsed time, number of usage cycles <strong>for</strong><br />

be<strong>for</strong>e vs. after demos<br />

– Must reflect true mechanism of action


Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Testimonials and Endorsements<br />

– Consumer’s opinions become claims<br />

if they are used in advertising.<br />

– Professional endorsements usually<br />

have a higher level of claims support<br />

required.<br />

• The advertiser must be able to<br />

independently support what the<br />

person has to say.


•Celebrity endorsement<br />

•Superiority<br />

•Guarantee<br />

Beckham / M3Power


Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Ingredient <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

– A “signal” ingredient is acceptable as<br />

long as the product <strong>for</strong>mula as a<br />

whole delivers on the claim<br />

– If a benefit is directly attributed to a<br />

specific ingredient, you must have<br />

data to show that ingredient provides<br />

the benefit at the level used in the<br />

product.


Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Drug <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

– Any claim of altering either the structure or<br />

function of the body is a drug claim<br />

• e.g. Stimulates the scalp<br />

– Any claim of prevention, treatment or cure<br />

of a disease state is a drug claim<br />

• e.g. prevents dandruff, maximum anti-perspirant<br />

protection<br />

– Every drug claim needs prior approval from<br />

the FDA


•Drug <strong>Claim</strong><br />

•Celebrity Endorsement<br />

Right Guard


Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Guarantees<br />

– Must be true and supported<br />

– Must comply with local law regarding<br />

disclosures<br />

– Guarantees are in the name of the brand<br />

itself and not directly on behalf of the<br />

Company.<br />

• Questions can be claims<br />

– e.g. Does your product keep your<br />

underarms dry<br />

• Insights can be claims<br />

– e.g. Did you know – when you have a bad<br />

shave......


Types of <strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

• Puffery<br />

– Applies to only those statements so<br />

obviously an exaggeration that<br />

consumers won’t interpret as a literal<br />

statement of fact.


•Superiority<br />

•Demonstration<br />

Breakthrough


Legal and Regulatory<br />

Requirements


Where Does the Substantiation<br />

Data Go<br />

• The substantiation <strong>for</strong> a claim must be<br />

assembled prior to publication of that<br />

claim in accordance with local standards<br />

• In most countries, truthful and<br />

substantiated advertising is required by<br />

law.<br />

– Different views on what sort of claim can even<br />

be made<br />

– Different views on level of proof required<br />

• (Consumer data, Instrumental data, Clinical data)<br />

– Different views on what constitutes proper<br />

substantiation


Where Does the Substantiation<br />

Data Go<br />

• After publication, the data may need to<br />

be disclosed:<br />

– In response to a competitive challenge<br />

• Direct discussion<br />

• Litigation<br />

• Regulatory complaint procedure<br />

– In response to an inquiry from a regulatory<br />

body<br />

• Be very careful with data generation, as<br />

it is all discoverable in a litigation<br />

situation.


Advertising Review Agencies<br />

• There are a variety of external<br />

advertising review agencies globally.<br />

The agencies are made up of a<br />

combination of government and private<br />

organizations.<br />

• These agencies are responsible <strong>for</strong><br />

reviewing advertising <strong>for</strong> truthfulness<br />

and providing protection <strong>for</strong> the<br />

consumer.


Advertising Review Agencies<br />

• United States:<br />

• Substantiation data may be required as part<br />

of pre-clearance <strong>for</strong>:<br />

– network TV<br />

– network radio<br />

– print advertising (e.g., Good<br />

Housekeeping)<br />

• EU:<br />

• Substantiation <strong>for</strong> cosmetic product claims<br />

must be included in “PIP”<br />

• TV pre-clearance process:<br />

– UK - BACC (Broadcast Advertising Clearance<br />

Centre)<br />

– France - BVP (Bureau de Vérification de la<br />

Publicité)


Legal Challenge<br />

• False claims or claims that are not supported<br />

can expose legal actions, and result in<br />

negative public relations consequences….<br />

– Prohibition from further use of the claim<br />

– <strong>for</strong> pack copy<br />

• Repackage<br />

• Over-sticker<br />

• Mask over claim<br />

– Costly! <strong>Claim</strong>s challenges require valuable<br />

resources to respond and defend.<br />

– Loss of credibility: cascade effect elsewhere


The <strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical<br />

<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation Approach


<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation<br />

• What constitutes a method of claims<br />

substantiation <br />

– In the US, Consumer Use Tests (CUTs)<br />

are a generally accepted means of<br />

substantiating a claim (consumer<br />

perceivable attributes)<br />

– Instrumental Methods and Protocols<br />

– <strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical Methods and Protocols<br />

• Can be a combination of methods or a<br />

single method


<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation<br />

• In many countries, CUT data,<br />

standing alone, is not generally<br />

accepted as sufficient to<br />

substantiate a claim<br />

– These countries require “Objective”<br />

data<br />

• Instrumental Methods and Protocols<br />

• <strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical Methods and Protocols


<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation<br />

Strategy<br />

• Objective: Capitalize on consumer experience<br />

with products and understanding of technologies<br />

to identify and objectively measure signals /<br />

attributes<br />

– Understand Consumer Experience<br />

– Understand signals and use the appropriate<br />

methodology<br />

– Understand Physiology and its impact<br />

• e.g. Skin and Hair<br />

• Result: Determine the appropriate approach or<br />

combination of approaches to measure pertinent<br />

signals / attributes


<strong>Claim</strong>s Strategy<br />

In<br />

Vitro<br />

Laboratory<br />

Objective measures<br />

Quick and relatively inexpensive<br />

Must be Relevant / validated<br />

Links to final per<strong>for</strong>mance understood<br />

Combine these<br />

approaches to provide<br />

an appropriate<br />

package of data to<br />

support the claim<br />

Assess<br />

<strong>Claim</strong><br />

User<br />

Study<br />

<strong>Claim</strong>s<br />

<strong>Support</strong><br />

Package<br />

Establish need<br />

Understand target users<br />

Define approach<br />

In<br />

Vivo<br />

Home use (use & abuse)<br />

Appropriate population<br />

Confirm perception of per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Trained assessors<br />

Controlled<br />

Blind<br />

Instrumental / observational measures<br />

Self Assessment


Understanding the Desired <strong>Sensory</strong><br />

Experience (an example)<br />

• Background:<br />

– The business was interested in developing a<br />

product <strong>for</strong> women that fulfilled an unmet<br />

skin benefit need.<br />

– The development team was looking <strong>for</strong><br />

guidance in developing their Ideal <strong>Product</strong><br />

Model and advertising concept.


Understanding the Desired <strong>Sensory</strong><br />

Experience<br />

What sensory<br />

characteristics<br />

are desired<br />

by consumers<br />

How do you translate<br />

the desired sensory<br />

characteristics into<br />

measurable<br />

attributes


Identifying Desirable <strong>Sensory</strong><br />

Characteristics<br />

– Consumers have a difficult time describing what<br />

they want from a product.<br />

– When consumers can experience<br />

(see/feel/smell/taste/hear) products, they will<br />

provide more meaningful feedback <strong>for</strong> product<br />

development.<br />

– Creative ways to talk about our products can be<br />

gained from this consumer feedback.<br />

• “I love the way this makes my skin feel, I feel like I just<br />

moisturized!”<br />

• “This is too sticky!”<br />

• “Should smell like this!”


Signals and Sensations Associated With<br />

Desirable Skin<br />

Absence of Negatives


<strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical Testing<br />

• What is important to the consumer<br />

– Develop consumer vocabulary representing<br />

signals and sensations associated with the<br />

needs and fulfillment of benefits<br />

– Develop attributes that are measurable by<br />

consumer testing, instrumental testing,<br />

clinical testing, or a combination of tests.<br />

• How do we measure the benefits<br />

– Develop methods to measure the signals and<br />

sensations<br />

– Ensure that you are measuring the right thing<br />

• Develop integrated signals<br />

• Develop individual signals from complex terms


Translation of consumer desires into<br />

<strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical attributes<br />

• Recruit and train a Descriptive Analysis Panel,<br />

and / or….<br />

• Trained judges evaluate the sensory properties on<br />

a panel of consumers<br />

• Develop “measurable” attributes based on<br />

consumer signals and sensations<br />

– Visual attributes<br />

– Tactile attributes<br />

– Inherent physiological response<br />

• stinging, burning, soreness, tug and pull


Translation of consumer desires into<br />

<strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical attributes<br />

• Benefits of Methodology:<br />

– When instrumental methods are not<br />

sensitive enough<br />

– When instruments cannot measure<br />

the signal<br />

– When additional evidence (objective)<br />

is needed


Example: Descriptive Analysis<br />

4<br />

3.5<br />

<strong>Product</strong> 1<br />

<strong>Product</strong> 2<br />

3<br />

B<br />

B<br />

2.5<br />

B<br />

B<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

A<br />

B B B<br />

A<br />

A A<br />

A<br />

A<br />

B<br />

A<br />

B<br />

A<br />

A<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Attribute 1 Attribute 2 Attribute 3 Attribute 4 Attribute 5 Attribute 6 Attribute 7 Attribute 8 Attribute 9<br />

Within an attribute,<br />

samples with the<br />

same letter<br />

annotation are not<br />

significantly<br />

different from each<br />

other<br />

p < 0.05


<strong>Product</strong> Benefits<br />

• By understanding the signals and sensations<br />

consumers notice and developing an objective<br />

measurement tool, we were able to:<br />

– Link product function to its impact on the<br />

body<br />

– Develop appropriate products<br />

– Measure the correct signals<br />

– Identify a process to evaluate potential<br />

technical solutions<br />

– Develop a vocabulary to describe the<br />

product<br />

– Provide meaningful, objective, claim<br />

support


The <strong>Sensory</strong> Clinical<br />

<strong>Claim</strong>s Substantiation Approach<br />

Strategic Outcomes:<br />

• Introduction of sensory criteria <strong>for</strong> Advertising<br />

<strong>Claim</strong> Substantiation<br />

• <strong>Sensory</strong> replaces instrumental methods that<br />

cannot detect the perceived effects of the<br />

product<br />

• <strong>Sensory</strong> replaces instrumental methods when<br />

there are no instrumental measures<br />

• <strong>Claim</strong>s review boards accept the ‘sensory only’<br />

claims


<strong>Claim</strong> Substantiation Strategy<br />

<strong>Product</strong><br />

-Ingredient Level<br />

-<strong>Product</strong> Type<br />

Protocol<br />

-Level of Substantiation<br />

-Sensitivity<br />

<strong>Claim</strong><br />

-Wording<br />

Signal<br />

-What do we measure<br />

Measurement<br />

Tool<br />

-Measure the correct signal(s)<br />

-Combinations of techniques<br />

-Sensitivity


Thank You!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!