19.01.2015 Views

Tackling educational inequality - CentreForum

Tackling educational inequality - CentreForum

Tackling educational inequality - CentreForum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Tackling</strong> <strong>educational</strong> <strong>inequality</strong><br />

Ethnicity and deprivation<br />

Figure 22 shows how deprivation affects the attainment of different<br />

ethnic groups. For all ethnic groups, deprivation, as measured by free<br />

school meals, is linked to underperformance. Moreover, for all deprived<br />

ethnic groups shown (except Bangladeshi pupils), the attainment gap<br />

widens as pupils progress through school.<br />

Ethnicity and language<br />

There is a general assumption that language problems amongt immigrant<br />

communities act as a barrier to attainment. Indeed, English as an<br />

Additional Language (EAL) forms part of the basis for the allocation of<br />

deprivation funding. However, overall attainment data shown in figure<br />

23 reveals that the initial disadvantage of English not being a pupil’s<br />

‘mother tongue’, is overcome by later years. In fact, girls with EAL overtake<br />

both the overall national average and non-EAL pupils’ attainment<br />

levels by Key Stage 3. Thus, with appropriate support, the language<br />

barrier is not a permanent one.<br />

Ethnicity and behaviour<br />

Behavioural problems are most clearly indicated by exclusion rates.<br />

Prolonged periods of exclusion are highly detrimental to pupils’ <strong>educational</strong><br />

prospects.<br />

Exclusion rates reveal a clear pattern along ethnic lines, with pupils of<br />

Caribbean descent reporting much higher permanent exclusion rates<br />

(see figure 24). Although rates have fallen since 1997, Black Caribbean<br />

pupils were still three times more likely to be permanently excluded than<br />

White British pupils in 2005, and almost twice as likely to be excluded<br />

for a fixed period. More worryingly, these figures are suspected to<br />

be underestimates, due to ‘unofficial’ exclusions – when parents are<br />

‘advised’ to remove their child from a school in order to minimise the<br />

school’s official rates. 23<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!