Tackling educational inequality - CentreForum
Tackling educational inequality - CentreForum
Tackling educational inequality - CentreForum
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Tackling</strong> <strong>educational</strong> <strong>inequality</strong><br />
Doubling Deprivation Funding<br />
Government research shows that extra spending has significantly greater<br />
impact on the attainment of deprived pupils than on more affluent<br />
children. This argues for a greater bias of funding towards disadvantaged<br />
pupils. A properly functioning ‘pupil premium’ system would create the<br />
right framework for such a rebalancing of the education budget.<br />
A doubling of deprivation funding would enable the most deprived pupils<br />
in the state sector to receive the same level of per capita funding as in<br />
the private sector. This would cost an estimated £2.4 billion and be<br />
a much more manageable – and efficient – use of funds than Gordon<br />
Brown’s 2006 commitment to bring per capita spending for all pupils to<br />
the level of the private sector, which would cost an extra £17 billion.<br />
As liberals who believe in raising standards by giving parents real choice<br />
and voice, we instinctively baulk at the idea of central planners telling<br />
schools how best to use each pound of the additional deprivation<br />
funding proposed. The list of recommendations in this paper should be<br />
seen, therefore, as a ‘menu’ of options – with prices attached – from<br />
which schools might wish to choose. The precise balance between<br />
the individual reforms should be determined by those with a detailed<br />
knowledge of the school in question.<br />
The reforms put forward include:<br />
:<br />
:<br />
:<br />
Smaller class sizes at primary school<br />
Significantly more hours of teaching time for disadvantaged<br />
pupils, (including new powers for schools to make longer school<br />
days compulsory, Saturday schools and summer programmes)<br />
‘Hard to Serve’ bonuses, linked to performance related pay<br />
schemes, to attract and reward excellent teaching staff working<br />
in the most challenging schools<br />
An end to poor schooling:<br />
higher aspirations and standards for all<br />
It is important not to fall into a deterministic approach in emphasising<br />
the impact a pupil’s background has on his or her <strong>educational</strong> prospects.<br />
The quid pro quo for a doubling of deprivation funding is the expectation<br />
that deprivation will no longer be used as an excuse for low attainment.<br />
We need to challenge the poverty of aspiration in our education system,<br />
particularly for the worst performing schools. This paper is optimistic<br />
about the potential for individual schools to make a difference, and is encouraged<br />
by the achievements of a small but growing number of US charter<br />
schools and UK schools in delivering high attainment for deprived children.