19.01.2015 Views

Tackling educational inequality - CentreForum

Tackling educational inequality - CentreForum

Tackling educational inequality - CentreForum

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Tackling</strong> <strong>educational</strong> <strong>inequality</strong><br />

Doubling Deprivation Funding<br />

Government research shows that extra spending has significantly greater<br />

impact on the attainment of deprived pupils than on more affluent<br />

children. This argues for a greater bias of funding towards disadvantaged<br />

pupils. A properly functioning ‘pupil premium’ system would create the<br />

right framework for such a rebalancing of the education budget.<br />

A doubling of deprivation funding would enable the most deprived pupils<br />

in the state sector to receive the same level of per capita funding as in<br />

the private sector. This would cost an estimated £2.4 billion and be<br />

a much more manageable – and efficient – use of funds than Gordon<br />

Brown’s 2006 commitment to bring per capita spending for all pupils to<br />

the level of the private sector, which would cost an extra £17 billion.<br />

As liberals who believe in raising standards by giving parents real choice<br />

and voice, we instinctively baulk at the idea of central planners telling<br />

schools how best to use each pound of the additional deprivation<br />

funding proposed. The list of recommendations in this paper should be<br />

seen, therefore, as a ‘menu’ of options – with prices attached – from<br />

which schools might wish to choose. The precise balance between<br />

the individual reforms should be determined by those with a detailed<br />

knowledge of the school in question.<br />

The reforms put forward include:<br />

:<br />

:<br />

:<br />

Smaller class sizes at primary school<br />

Significantly more hours of teaching time for disadvantaged<br />

pupils, (including new powers for schools to make longer school<br />

days compulsory, Saturday schools and summer programmes)<br />

‘Hard to Serve’ bonuses, linked to performance related pay<br />

schemes, to attract and reward excellent teaching staff working<br />

in the most challenging schools<br />

An end to poor schooling:<br />

higher aspirations and standards for all<br />

It is important not to fall into a deterministic approach in emphasising<br />

the impact a pupil’s background has on his or her <strong>educational</strong> prospects.<br />

The quid pro quo for a doubling of deprivation funding is the expectation<br />

that deprivation will no longer be used as an excuse for low attainment.<br />

We need to challenge the poverty of aspiration in our education system,<br />

particularly for the worst performing schools. This paper is optimistic<br />

about the potential for individual schools to make a difference, and is encouraged<br />

by the achievements of a small but growing number of US charter<br />

schools and UK schools in delivering high attainment for deprived children.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!