19.01.2015 Views

Overlooked - Liberty

Overlooked - Liberty

Overlooked - Liberty

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Overlooked</strong>: Surveillance and personal privacy in modern Britain 45<br />

a critically important role for the ICO in focusing the ‘constitutional’ implications of data management,<br />

taking account of Article 8, the Human Rights Act, and EU developments 100 . It will be necessary for<br />

the Commissioner to be proactive in asserting the need for safeguards, and enforceable codes of<br />

practice, as well as ensuring that essential incremental change is carried through.<br />

Debating the future of visual surveillance<br />

It takes time for regulation to catch up with technological advance, and the need for a broad, wellunderstood<br />

national strategy, coupled with a regulatory system flexible enough to respond to<br />

change has never been greater. The ubiquity and general tolerance of CCTV cameras in daily life<br />

means that major changes in the nature of surveillance could take place without the public being<br />

fully informed and the implications properly tested. The use of digital techniques using biometric<br />

identification systems, and smart systems to track behaviour, as well as simple loudspeaker and<br />

microphone devices without informed consideration risk the occurrence of unforeseen and<br />

unintended consequences.<br />

The unfettered expansion of technology has the potential to lead in the direction of startling crossdatabase<br />

applications of recorded material. Experience in other jurisdictions emphasises the<br />

importance of countries being able to rely on legislative, constitutional, and international standards.<br />

China’s Golden Shield Project is an attempt to converge numerous technological applications in<br />

public sector infrastructure, banking and finance, and a range of public databases, as a matter of<br />

routine crime prevention and investigation. It has been reported by one writer that Golden Shield’s<br />

aim is to integrate this gigantic online database with a surveillance network, incorporating speech<br />

and face recognition, closed circuit television, smart cards, credit records, and other surveillance<br />

technologies 101 . In 2003, the US Congress overruled an attempt by the Pentagon to introduce a<br />

scheme, Total Information Awareness, (later referred to as Terrorist Information Awareness), capable<br />

of interrogating multiple public databases, although the dismissal of this proposal has not quelled<br />

anxieties about future moves in that direction 102 .<br />

The Information Commissioner is the lynchpin of effective regulation. Some significant questions are<br />

posed as a result of current experience in this context, and must be resolved urgently: the ability of<br />

the Data Protection Act to regulate visual surveillance; the need for the ICO to have adequate<br />

resources to monitor and sufficient enforcement powers to take action over breaches of DPA<br />

requirements.<br />

These questions do not however address the more fundamental issues for the future management<br />

of visual surveillance that are beyond the remit of the Information Commissioner. The expenditure of<br />

further huge sums of public money in updating schemes alone should increase the demand for<br />

100<br />

Korff, D., & Brown, I., UK Information Commissioner Study Project: Privacy and Law Enforcement,<br />

Foundation for Information Policy Research, February 2004.<br />

101<br />

China’s Golden Shield Project, in Computing as a tool of governmental repression, Stanford University<br />

website making reference to China’s Golden Shield: Corporations and the Development of Surveillance<br />

Technology in the People’s Republic of China, Walton, G. at: http://www.ichrdd.ca/english/commdoc<br />

/publications/globalization/goldenShieldEng.html (04/08/2006).<br />

102<br />

The defeat of the proposal is referred to in a New Scientist article, Citizens Strike Back in Intelligence War,<br />

13 October 2003: http://www.newscientist.com/article.nsid=dn4246 The ACLU had made a substantial<br />

submission to Congress: http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/16854leg20030619.html (11.09.06).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!