Overlooked - Liberty
Overlooked - Liberty
Overlooked - Liberty
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Overlooked</strong>: Surveillance and personal privacy in modern Britain 45<br />
a critically important role for the ICO in focusing the ‘constitutional’ implications of data management,<br />
taking account of Article 8, the Human Rights Act, and EU developments 100 . It will be necessary for<br />
the Commissioner to be proactive in asserting the need for safeguards, and enforceable codes of<br />
practice, as well as ensuring that essential incremental change is carried through.<br />
Debating the future of visual surveillance<br />
It takes time for regulation to catch up with technological advance, and the need for a broad, wellunderstood<br />
national strategy, coupled with a regulatory system flexible enough to respond to<br />
change has never been greater. The ubiquity and general tolerance of CCTV cameras in daily life<br />
means that major changes in the nature of surveillance could take place without the public being<br />
fully informed and the implications properly tested. The use of digital techniques using biometric<br />
identification systems, and smart systems to track behaviour, as well as simple loudspeaker and<br />
microphone devices without informed consideration risk the occurrence of unforeseen and<br />
unintended consequences.<br />
The unfettered expansion of technology has the potential to lead in the direction of startling crossdatabase<br />
applications of recorded material. Experience in other jurisdictions emphasises the<br />
importance of countries being able to rely on legislative, constitutional, and international standards.<br />
China’s Golden Shield Project is an attempt to converge numerous technological applications in<br />
public sector infrastructure, banking and finance, and a range of public databases, as a matter of<br />
routine crime prevention and investigation. It has been reported by one writer that Golden Shield’s<br />
aim is to integrate this gigantic online database with a surveillance network, incorporating speech<br />
and face recognition, closed circuit television, smart cards, credit records, and other surveillance<br />
technologies 101 . In 2003, the US Congress overruled an attempt by the Pentagon to introduce a<br />
scheme, Total Information Awareness, (later referred to as Terrorist Information Awareness), capable<br />
of interrogating multiple public databases, although the dismissal of this proposal has not quelled<br />
anxieties about future moves in that direction 102 .<br />
The Information Commissioner is the lynchpin of effective regulation. Some significant questions are<br />
posed as a result of current experience in this context, and must be resolved urgently: the ability of<br />
the Data Protection Act to regulate visual surveillance; the need for the ICO to have adequate<br />
resources to monitor and sufficient enforcement powers to take action over breaches of DPA<br />
requirements.<br />
These questions do not however address the more fundamental issues for the future management<br />
of visual surveillance that are beyond the remit of the Information Commissioner. The expenditure of<br />
further huge sums of public money in updating schemes alone should increase the demand for<br />
100<br />
Korff, D., & Brown, I., UK Information Commissioner Study Project: Privacy and Law Enforcement,<br />
Foundation for Information Policy Research, February 2004.<br />
101<br />
China’s Golden Shield Project, in Computing as a tool of governmental repression, Stanford University<br />
website making reference to China’s Golden Shield: Corporations and the Development of Surveillance<br />
Technology in the People’s Republic of China, Walton, G. at: http://www.ichrdd.ca/english/commdoc<br />
/publications/globalization/goldenShieldEng.html (04/08/2006).<br />
102<br />
The defeat of the proposal is referred to in a New Scientist article, Citizens Strike Back in Intelligence War,<br />
13 October 2003: http://www.newscientist.com/article.nsid=dn4246 The ACLU had made a substantial<br />
submission to Congress: http://www.aclu.org/safefree/general/16854leg20030619.html (11.09.06).