19.01.2015 Views

Breast Discharge: Ultrasound and Doppler Evaluation - NCI

Breast Discharge: Ultrasound and Doppler Evaluation - NCI

Breast Discharge: Ultrasound and Doppler Evaluation - NCI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

264<br />

RESULTS<br />

One hundred <strong>and</strong> seven patients, their mean<br />

age 42±13 years <strong>and</strong> their ages ranged between<br />

23 <strong>and</strong> 65 years, presenting either by uniorifical<br />

breast discharge (54 cases) or multi orifice<br />

discharge (one of them with bloody or serosanguous<br />

discharge) (53 cases) (Table 1). Duct<br />

ectasia was the predominant pathology, identified<br />

in 88 cases, their ages range 23-53 years,<br />

with mean age 33.8±11.6 years. While intraductal<br />

mass lesions were identified in only 17<br />

cases, their ages ranging between 27-65 years,<br />

with mean age: 45±12 years. Two cases were<br />

normal.<br />

<strong>Ultrasound</strong> proved to have 100% <strong>and</strong> 82.4%<br />

sensitivity <strong>and</strong> specificity in differentiating<br />

intraductal mass from non mass lesions, namely<br />

inspissated secretions <strong>and</strong> in identifying the<br />

benign or malignant nature of these masses.<br />

Colour <strong>and</strong> power <strong>Doppler</strong> raises specificity<br />

<strong>and</strong> diagnostic accuracy to 100%.<br />

The mean size of papillomas was (8.7±<br />

4.3mm). They lied within 3.2±2.1cm from the<br />

nipple. They all fulfilled the above described<br />

criteria with the exception of two papillomas<br />

with rather irregular outline (Fig. 2). A vascular<br />

stalk could be identified in 4 cases <strong>and</strong> minimal<br />

peripheral vascularity in 3 cases (Fig. 3), Ductoscopy,<br />

performed for 1 case, confirmed the<br />

site <strong>and</strong> size of the ultrasound detected papilloma<br />

(Fig. 4). 3D US was performed confirming the<br />

intraductal location of a lesion (Fig. 5).<br />

The intraductal papillomas showing atypia<br />

measured 5 <strong>and</strong> 11mm, being located between<br />

12 <strong>and</strong> 27mm from the nipple respectively. They<br />

showed higher vascularity than papillomas, the<br />

vessels are arranged in haphazard distribution<br />

(Fig. 6). The case proved to be ductal hyperplasia<br />

with atypia, was discovered during annual<br />

follow-up for fibrocystic breast changes, an<br />

intraductal mass 5mm is seen 27mm from the<br />

nipple (Fig. 7).<br />

<strong>Ultrasound</strong> was complementary to mammography<br />

in identifying malignant intraductal lesions,<br />

one case proved to be invasive ductal<br />

carcinoma, on mammography it was reported<br />

as BIRADS 3, on ultrasound an intraductal mass<br />

with wall irregularity was seen, microcalcification<br />

are seen within the mass but obscured on<br />

Soha T. Hamed, et al.<br />

mammogram by lobulated dilated duct (Fig. 8).<br />

Other masses were ranging in size 4-14mm, no<br />

definite ductal dilatation was seen in two of<br />

them. On colour <strong>Doppler</strong>, malignant lesion<br />

showed higher vascularity, non tapering r<strong>and</strong>omly<br />

dispersed vessels except in small 4mm<br />

mass.<br />

Simple duct ectasia was identified in 88<br />

cases according to the above described criteria.<br />

Mammography showed tubular retroareolar<br />

density in 8 cases, in the rest of cases, there<br />

was just an increase in retroareolar density; By<br />

US In 51 cases, bilateral dilated thin walled<br />

ducts are ranging in caliber from 3-8mm, some<br />

of the ducts showed Intra-ductal mobile, non<br />

adherent movable echogenic secretions were<br />

sometimes identified. In two cases, echogenic<br />

ball like lesions were identified resembling<br />

intraductal pappilomas, yet, they were non<br />

adherent to the wall <strong>and</strong> no colour flow could<br />

be detected on <strong>Doppler</strong> application (Fig. 9).<br />

The ducts were completely normal on both<br />

ultrasound <strong>and</strong> galactography in two cases.<br />

Ductography was requested in 20 cases, in<br />

five cases, intraductal filling defects were seen<br />

three cases proved to be intraductal mass lesions,<br />

other two cases were inssipisated secretions<br />

with no malignancy. Ductography showed 100%<br />

sensitivity <strong>and</strong> 60% specificity in diagnosing<br />

intraductal filling defect.<br />

Table (1): Pathological diagnosis of uni-orificial discha.<br />

Pathological diagnosis<br />

Intraductal carcinoma<br />

Intraductal papilloma<br />

(including intraductal<br />

papillomatosis, one case)<br />

Intra ductal papilloma/<br />

hyperplasia with atypia<br />

Localized duct ectasia<br />

Bilateral diffuse duct ectasia<br />

Normal<br />

Total<br />

No. of cases %<br />

6 (5.6%)<br />

8 (7.5%)<br />

3 (2.8%)<br />

37 (35%)<br />

51 (47.7%)<br />

2 (1.8%)<br />

107 (100%)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!