19.01.2015 Views

Breast Discharge: Ultrasound and Doppler Evaluation - NCI

Breast Discharge: Ultrasound and Doppler Evaluation - NCI

Breast Discharge: Ultrasound and Doppler Evaluation - NCI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Breast</strong> <strong>Discharge</strong>: <strong>Ultrasound</strong> & <strong>Doppler</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong><br />

papilloma irregular outline was encountered.<br />

Other authors reported that An oval or lobulated<br />

shape was found more frequently in intraductal<br />

carcinoma than in invasive carcinomas [11].<br />

In malignant cases diagnosed in this study,<br />

no microcalcification could be seen in mammography<br />

even in the case of invasive duct<br />

carcinoma. The microcalcifications were obscured<br />

by dilated duct proximal to mass. Mammographic<br />

detection of DCIS lesions without<br />

microcalcifications may be quite difficult, especially<br />

in dense breasts. At US, most DCIS<br />

lesions without calcifications manifest as single<br />

or multiple hypoechoic masses without a<br />

pseudocapsule. Ductal extension is sometimes<br />

seen. It is easier to visualize noncalcified DCIS<br />

lesions than calcified DCIS lesions at US because<br />

of their hypoechogenicity, but they can<br />

also be misinterpreted as benign nodules due<br />

to their roundness <strong>and</strong> well-circumscribed margins.<br />

Posterior acoustic enhancement may be<br />

seen in large masses. DCIS lesions without<br />

calcifications may manifest as a solid or cystic<br />

mass with solid component [12]. Diagnosis of<br />

non-calcified DCIS by mammography is not an<br />

easy task due to the lack of typical malignant<br />

calcifications or masses. High resolution ultrasound<br />

can be useful for detecting non-calcified<br />

DCIS [13].<br />

In the study of Yang <strong>and</strong> TSI in 2004, Color<br />

power <strong>Doppler</strong> sonography revealed a positive<br />

signal in 22 (69%) of 32 patients in whom it<br />

was performed, so they concluded that it is not<br />

discriminating feature [14]. In the contrary, in<br />

our study all cases with intraductal masses<br />

showed different pattern of vascularity. So it<br />

was highly sensitive <strong>and</strong> specific (100%) in<br />

discriminating between solid masses <strong>and</strong> inspissated<br />

secretions. Vessel arrangement helped in<br />

differentiating benign from malignant masses.<br />

In this study, ultrasound guided ductoscopy<br />

in three cases facilitated lesion delineation. The<br />

size of the mass <strong>and</strong> its distance from the nipple<br />

was comparable. Mammary endoscopy (ductoscopy)<br />

is a recently introduced technique, which<br />

may allow more precise identification <strong>and</strong> delineation<br />

of intraductal disease but is not currently<br />

a st<strong>and</strong>ard practice among most surgeons.<br />

Ductoscopy has been reported to result in improved<br />

localization of intraductal lesions [15].<br />

269<br />

We concluded that ultrasound examination<br />

is highly sensitive(100%) but less specific<br />

(82.4%) in diagnosis of intraductal pathology.<br />

Colour & power <strong>Doppler</strong> are sensitive (94%)<br />

in detecting flow in intraductal echogenic masses<br />

to differentiate them from insipissated secretions.<br />

Colour & power <strong>Doppler</strong> raises specificity<br />

<strong>and</strong> diagnostic accuracy to 100%. Ultrasonography<br />

is a m<strong>and</strong>atory complement to mammography<br />

in these cases. US guided fine needle<br />

biopsy is minimally invasive technique in confirming<br />

the diagnosis of suspicious mass. <strong>Ultrasound</strong><br />

may also be a guide to fibro-optic ductoscope.<br />

Ductography is an underused procedure<br />

that is sensitive (100%) but less specific (60%)<br />

in characterization of intraductal filling defects.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1- Azavedo E. <strong>Breast</strong>, Nipple <strong>Discharge</strong> <strong>Evaluation</strong>. e<br />

Medicine specialties. Radiology. <strong>Breast</strong> 10 June. 2005.<br />

2- Baker KS, Davey DD, Stelling CB. Ductal abnormalities<br />

detected with galactography: Frequency of adequate<br />

excisional biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994,<br />

Apr 162 (4): 821-4.<br />

3- Shalmali Pal. <strong>Ultrasound</strong> continues to make inroads<br />

in breast imaging, Aunt Minnie.com. <strong>Ultrasound</strong><br />

digital community. 2/6/2007.<br />

4- Okazaki A, Hirata K, Okazaki M, Svane G, Azavedo<br />

E. Nipple discharge disorders: Current diagnostic<br />

management <strong>and</strong> the role of fiber-ductoscopy. European<br />

Radiology. 1999, 9 (4): 583-590.<br />

5- Cho N, Moon WK, Chung SY, Cha JH, Cho KS, Kim<br />

EK, et al. Ductographic Findings of <strong>Breast</strong> Cancer.<br />

Korean Journal of Radiology. 2005, March 6 (1): 31-<br />

36.<br />

6- Stavros AT. Non targeted indications: <strong>Breast</strong> secretions,<br />

nipple discharge, <strong>and</strong> intraductal papillary lesions of<br />

the breast. In: Stavros AT, ed. <strong>Breast</strong> ultrasound, 1 st<br />

ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.<br />

2004, 157-198.<br />

7- Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im<br />

JG. US of ductal carcinoma in situ. RadioGraphics.<br />

2002, 22: 269-280.<br />

8- Chung SY, Lee KW, Park KS, Lee Y, Bae SH. <strong>Breast</strong><br />

tumors associated with nipple discharge. Correlation<br />

of findings on galactography <strong>and</strong> sonography. Clin<br />

Imaging. 1995, 19: 165-171.<br />

9- Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA,<br />

Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: Use of<br />

sonography to distinguish between benign <strong>and</strong> malignant<br />

lesions. Radiology. 1995, 196: 123-134.<br />

10- Nelson S, Hoehn JL: Twenty-Year Outcome Following<br />

Central Duct Resection for Bloody Nipple <strong>Discharge</strong>.<br />

Ann Surg. 2006, April 243 (4): 522-524.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!