20.01.2015 Views

FULLTEXT01

FULLTEXT01

FULLTEXT01

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TACTICAL THOUGHT<br />

2014 September 29 th<br />

Figures<br />

Figure 1. The research design. 18<br />

Figure 2. The empirical generalization of the term Irregular Warfare 48<br />

Figure 3. An overview of differences between Regular and Irregular Warfare 55<br />

Figure 4. Background factor contents and distribution. 58<br />

Figure 5. Summary of civilian education distribution. 59<br />

Figure 6. Summary of military education distribution. 59<br />

Figure 7. Axis 1-10, Eigenvalue results from MCA calculations. 65<br />

Figure 8. Graph of Specific Modified Rates for axis 1 – 16. 66<br />

Figure 9. Axis 1. Results of coordinates and contribution of answer categories. 67<br />

Figure 10. Distribution of the answer categories used for interpretation of axis 1. 68<br />

Figure 11. Axis 2.Results of coordinates and contribution of answer categories. 69<br />

Figure 12. Distribution of the answer categories used for interpretation of axis 2. 70<br />

Figure 13. Axis 3. Results of coordinates and contribution of answer categories. 71<br />

Figure 14. Axis 4. Results of coordinates and contribution of answer categories. 72<br />

Figure 15. Summary chart of axes content and thought perspective label. 73<br />

Figure 16. The model of the space of statements structured by axis 1 & 2. 75<br />

Figure 17. Examples of basic capabilities and characteristics for the four tactical types. 77<br />

Figure 18. Distribution graph 1; Unit affiliation, types, background and role 2011. 79<br />

Figure 19. Distribution graph 2; Age, Rank, Military and Civil Education. 81<br />

Figure 20. Distribution graph 3; Missions; roles, numbers, area and combat experience. 83<br />

Figure 21. Symbolic capital structure of the space of statement. 87<br />

Figure 22. Individual distribution in relation to the tactical types in the model. 90<br />

Figure 23. Individual distribution in the model according to command roles. 91<br />

Figure 24. Graph showing non-centric distribution of officers in the space of standpoints. 92<br />

Figure 25. Military Symbolic Capital structure in the space of statements. 102<br />

Figure 26. Appendix 1. An overview of American definitions 2009-1940. 14<br />

Figure 27. Appendix 1. An overview of modern definitions. 19<br />

Figure 28. Appendix 1. Summary of views on Irregular Warfare, Period One. 31<br />

Figure 29. Appendix 1. Summary of views on Irregular Warfare, Period Two. 48<br />

Figure 30. Appendix 1. Summary of views on Irregular Warfare, Period Two. 49<br />

Figure 31. Appendix 1. Summary of views on Irregular Warfare, Period Three. 65<br />

Figure 32. Appendix 1. Summary of views on Irregular Warfare, Period Three. 66<br />

Figure 33. Appendix 1. Summary of views on Irregular Warfare, Period Three. 67<br />

Figure 34. Appendix 1. The result of the doctrine and literature analysis – Question 1. 71<br />

Figure 35. Appendix 1. The result of the doctrine and literature analysis – Question 2. 72<br />

Figure 36. Appendix 1. The result of the doctrine and literature analysis – Question 3. 73<br />

Figure 37. Appendix 1. Overview of characteristics of Regular and Irregular Warfare. 75<br />

Figure 38. Appendix 4. Table 1. The 15 chosen questions with 41 modalities. 1<br />

Figure 39. Appendix 5. Table 2. The 15 chosen questions with 41 modalities. 1<br />

Figure 40. Appendix 8. Overview of the result comparison of COIN doctrines. 13<br />

Figure 41. Appendix 9. Inter-assessment reliability test of axis 1. 1<br />

Figure 42. Appendix 9, Inter-assessment reliability test of axis 2. 2<br />

v

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!