20.01.2015 Views

FULLTEXT01

FULLTEXT01

FULLTEXT01

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TACTICAL THOUGHT<br />

2014 September 29 th<br />

This leads to a need to adapt the intelligence function. Different models for focused<br />

analysis are mentioned to facilitate the categorization of Insurgency, such as Dr. John<br />

MacKinlay's model with five different types of insurgencies. 563 Understanding of "the<br />

Human Terrain" is emphasized as a basis for understanding the uprisings 564 . A detailed<br />

description on integrating intelligence with the work in general emphasizes the<br />

importance of the tactical level, time, training and continuity. 565 The importance of<br />

intelligence and having such a capability at the tactical level as the instrument for the<br />

analysis is clear. References to systems thinking are not included.<br />

The concept of centre of gravity (COG) is described as more complex (compared to in<br />

Regular Warfare), but important to use. 566 As an example of an "Operational COG",<br />

"Population optimism about their future” 567 is mentioned. The description of how<br />

insurgents must be understood is characterized by emphasis on adaption of the<br />

intelligence function and work needed to be integrated throughout the whole staff work<br />

structure, and this will be built up over time. Accurate descriptions of how and why this<br />

is required are included. The Intelligence and Security functions and work are<br />

emphasized as an integral part of the entire planning and implementation process, as<br />

well as important for education of officers in general. HUMINT specifically is<br />

mentioned, as well as analysis and research. 568 The intelligence function is placed at the<br />

top of the summary of experience 569 to develop. Intelligence, the intelligence staff,<br />

ISTAR and problem areas have 14 pages devoted to them. 570 . Understanding of "the<br />

Human Terrain" is emphasized as crucial; only understanding the enemy is not viewed<br />

sufficiently. 571<br />

Summary answer U.S. 572 ; descriptions of insurgencies to be analysed and understood<br />

are frequent, down to the company level. 573 Effective analysis is viewed to require<br />

knowledge of the Insurgency strategically, its operational and tactical objectives, which<br />

can be both physical and non-physical. 574 . Descriptions are characterized by pervasive<br />

system thinking. Descriptions of centre of gravity (COG) do not occur (the dictionary<br />

indicates COG as a joint description). The COIN environment is said to consist of a<br />

"system of systems" (inter-connected systems). 575 A clear structure and concept for the<br />

analysis is described. Eight operational variables are used (the so-called PMESII-PT;<br />

the political, military, environment, social, information, infrastructure, physical<br />

environment and time aspects).<br />

563 UK Ministry of Defence, British Army Field Manual, Volume 10, Part 10, Combined Arms<br />

Operations, Countering Insurgency (2009), Annex A to Chapter 2.<br />

564 Ibid. Chapter 3. section 3-12 – 16.<br />

565 Ibid. Chapter 3. section 3-33 – 37.<br />

566 Ibid. Chapter 7. section 7-8 Planning Concept.<br />

567 Ibid. Chapter 7. figure 7-2.<br />

568 Ibid. Chapter 3. section 3-37 and 3-44.<br />

569 Ibid. Chapter 4. section 4-51.<br />

570 Ibid. Chapter 5. section 5-1 – 42.<br />

571 Ibid. Chapter 5. section 5-1.<br />

572 U.S. Department of the Army, Headquarters, Tactics in Counterinsurgency, Field Manual 3-24.2,<br />

April 2009.<br />

573 Ibid. Chapter 2.<br />

574 Ibid. p. 45.<br />

575 Ibid. p. 251.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!