13.11.2012 Views

Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...

Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...

Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

After submitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>ir responses for <strong>the</strong> Holt-Laury task, <strong>the</strong> resolution procedures were<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>ed on screen (see Figure A.4 of Appendix A). Although it would have been<br />

straightforward to automate <strong>the</strong> resolution of <strong>the</strong> various randomizations to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong><br />

subjects' respective payoffs, to ensure <strong>the</strong> credibility of <strong>the</strong> randomizations each subject <strong>in</strong> turn—<br />

and <strong>in</strong> private—rolled seven unique dice simultaneously: one 20-sided die to determ<strong>in</strong>e which<br />

stage <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> BDM phase was resolved, three 10-sided dice to yield a three-digit decimal number<br />

which determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> random price based on <strong>the</strong> relevant distribution for that stage, one 10-<br />

sided die to determ<strong>in</strong>e which row of <strong>the</strong> Holt-Laury procedure was played, and two 10-sided dice<br />

to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> outcome of <strong>the</strong> lottery chosen by <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> randomly selected row of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Holt-Laury procedure. 22<br />

Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> payoff resolution, <strong>the</strong> subjects completed a ten-question survey on<br />

SurveyMonkey, which <strong>in</strong>cluded (among o<strong>the</strong>rs) questions about <strong>the</strong>ir valuations for <strong>the</strong> item<br />

before and after <strong>the</strong> experiment, how <strong>the</strong>y came to make <strong>the</strong>ir decisions, and <strong>the</strong> clarity of <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>structions. 23<br />

4 Descriptive Statistics and Results<br />

Three sessions were conducted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Xlab <strong>in</strong> February and March of 2011 with a total of 69<br />

subjects. Each session lasted slightly less than one hour. The average monetary payment was<br />

$15.86, and 22 (i.e., 31.9%) of <strong>the</strong> 69 subjects also received <strong>the</strong> item <strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong> monetary<br />

payment (see Table 2).<br />

22 While any of <strong>the</strong> lotteries <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Holt-Laury procedure could have been resolved with one ten-sided die, two tensided<br />

dice were used to make that part of <strong>the</strong> randomization more <strong>in</strong>tuitive for <strong>the</strong> subjects given that <strong>the</strong><br />

probabilities of <strong>the</strong> lotteries had been expressed <strong>in</strong> percentages.<br />

23 See <strong>the</strong> end of Appendix A for a full list of <strong>the</strong> survey questions.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!