Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...
Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...
Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Mazar, N<strong>in</strong>a, Botond Kőszegi, and Dan Ariely. 2009. “Price-Sensitive Preferences,”<br />
Mimeo.<br />
Noussair, Charles, Stephane Rob<strong>in</strong>, and Bernard Ruffieux. 2004. “Reveal<strong>in</strong>g consumers'<br />
will<strong>in</strong>gness-to-pay: a comparison of <strong>the</strong> BDM mechanism and <strong>the</strong> Vickrey auction.” Journal of<br />
Economic Psychology 25(6): 725-741.<br />
Safra, Zvi, Uzi Segal, and Avia Spivak. 1990. “The <strong>Becker</strong>-<strong>DeGroot</strong>-<strong>Marschak</strong> Mechanism<br />
and Nonexpected Utility: A Testable Approach.” Journal of Risk and Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty 3: 177-190.<br />
Segal, Uzi. 1988. “Does <strong>the</strong> Preference Reversal Phenomenon Necessarily Contradict <strong>the</strong><br />
Independence Axiom?” American Economic Review 78(1): 233-236.<br />
Plott, Charles and Kathryn Zeiler. 2005. “The Will<strong>in</strong>gness-to-Pay—Will<strong>in</strong>gness to Accept<br />
Gap, <strong>the</strong> ‘Endowment Effect,’ Subject Misconceptions, and Experimental Procedures for Elicit<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Valuations.” American Economic Review 95(3): 530-545.<br />
Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment under Uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty: Heuristics and<br />
Biases.” Science 185(4157): 1124-1131.<br />
Vickrey, William. 1961. “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders.”<br />
Journal of F<strong>in</strong>ance 16: 8-37.<br />
Wertenbroch, Klaus and Bernd Skiera. 2002. “Measur<strong>in</strong>g Consumers’ Will<strong>in</strong>gness to Pay<br />
at <strong>the</strong> Po<strong>in</strong>t of Purchase.” Journal of Market<strong>in</strong>g Research 39: 228-241.<br />
41