13.11.2012 Views

Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...

Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...

Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Number of Subjects<br />

11<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28<br />

Upper Limit of Variance<br />

Figure 1. Paired Histogram of Variance of WTP Elicitations by Instruction<br />

Version<br />

Figure 2. Will<strong>in</strong>gness to Pay <strong>in</strong> Rounds 1 and 2<br />

Frequency<br />

Panel A. Round 1 WTP (All subjects faced <strong>the</strong> same triangular distribution, #14.)<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0<br />

42<br />

basic <strong>in</strong>structions<br />

detailed <strong>in</strong>structions<br />

0.5<br />

1<br />

1.5<br />

2<br />

2.5<br />

3<br />

3.5<br />

4<br />

4.5<br />

5<br />

5.5<br />

6<br />

6.5<br />

7<br />

7.5<br />

8<br />

8.5<br />

9<br />

9.5<br />

10<br />

10.5<br />

11<br />

11.5<br />

12<br />

12.5<br />

13<br />

13.5<br />

14<br />

14.5<br />

15<br />

WTP (<strong>in</strong> $)<br />

Triangular repeated com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Round 2<br />

Spiked at $5 com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Round 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!