Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...
Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...
Testing Distributional Dependence in the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Number of Subjects<br />
11<br />
10<br />
9<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28<br />
Upper Limit of Variance<br />
Figure 1. Paired Histogram of Variance of WTP Elicitations by Instruction<br />
Version<br />
Figure 2. Will<strong>in</strong>gness to Pay <strong>in</strong> Rounds 1 and 2<br />
Frequency<br />
Panel A. Round 1 WTP (All subjects faced <strong>the</strong> same triangular distribution, #14.)<br />
8<br />
7<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
0<br />
42<br />
basic <strong>in</strong>structions<br />
detailed <strong>in</strong>structions<br />
0.5<br />
1<br />
1.5<br />
2<br />
2.5<br />
3<br />
3.5<br />
4<br />
4.5<br />
5<br />
5.5<br />
6<br />
6.5<br />
7<br />
7.5<br />
8<br />
8.5<br />
9<br />
9.5<br />
10<br />
10.5<br />
11<br />
11.5<br />
12<br />
12.5<br />
13<br />
13.5<br />
14<br />
14.5<br />
15<br />
WTP (<strong>in</strong> $)<br />
Triangular repeated com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Round 2<br />
Spiked at $5 com<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Round 2