22.01.2015 Views

UKWA FOR WEB - United Kingdom Warehousing Association

UKWA FOR WEB - United Kingdom Warehousing Association

UKWA FOR WEB - United Kingdom Warehousing Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Environment 13<br />

GOVERNMENT<br />

Government says<br />

‘No’ to longer lorries<br />

The Secretary of State for Transport, Ruth<br />

Kelly, has turned down proposals to allow<br />

longer heavier vehicles (LHVs), also known<br />

as eco-combis, on British roads, citing the<br />

findings of the Heriott Watt University/<br />

Transport Research Laboratory report commissioned<br />

by the Department. Copies of the<br />

report have been placed in the libraries of<br />

both Houses of Parliament and it can also<br />

be viewed at www.trl.co.uk.<br />

“The report highlights a number of issues<br />

that make the implementation of LHVs<br />

impractical either on a permanent or trial<br />

basis,” said Ms Kelly. “I will therefore not be<br />

allowing them on UK roads for the foreseeable<br />

future.<br />

“There is a risk of increased CO2 emissions<br />

and other environmental drawbacks due to<br />

modal shift from rail to road if these vehicles<br />

were to be permitted, which would also impact<br />

on the viability of existing rail freight services<br />

and the potential for future growth.<br />

“There are serious implications for the<br />

management of the road network and<br />

...substantial investment would be needed<br />

to provide for junction improvements, the<br />

protection of bridge supports, and the provision<br />

of parking infrastructure for statutory<br />

rest periods, particularly if a new nationwide<br />

network of dedicated facilities is<br />

required.”<br />

The government noted that LHVs would<br />

be unsuitable for many roads and junctions.<br />

However, non-steered semitrailers [on artics<br />

up to 16.5m loa and 40t gvw] are already<br />

unsuitable for many roads and junctions,<br />

but are permitted under existing legislation.<br />

Publication of the HWU/TRL report was<br />

delayed for about nine months, leading to<br />

suspicion that the government was unhappy<br />

with its findings and demanded a redrafting<br />

that was less supportive of LHVs. However,<br />

just a few weeks ago, Ms Kelly said she had<br />

not seen the report, which surprised some<br />

industry observers.<br />

The Freight on Rail (FoR) alliance<br />

expressed its delight at the government’s<br />

In <strong>Association</strong> with<br />

decision. As campaign director Philippa<br />

Edmunds explained, FoR has never accepted<br />

the fundamental argument that LHVs<br />

would result in fewer lorries, lower emissions<br />

and reduced exposure to accidents.<br />

She added that research commissioned<br />

by FoR shows that previous increases in<br />

lorry dimensions have resulted in more lorries<br />

driving around less full, causing more<br />

road congestion and more pollution - the<br />

reverse of what was claimed would happen<br />

if LHVs were introduced.<br />

The Chartered<br />

Institute of Logistics and<br />

Transport (CILT) criticised<br />

the Minister’s<br />

decision. CILT says that<br />

it acknowledges the<br />

credibility of much of<br />

the report, but believes<br />

an outright veto is the<br />

wrong decision.<br />

Its CEO Steve Agg<br />

said: “Rejecting LHVs<br />

without physical trials is a<br />

wasted opportunity. The<br />

fact that the Secretary of<br />

State has used the emotive<br />

term “super-lorry” suggests a biased<br />

approach. The sensible decision would have<br />

been to specify trials that could have provided<br />

real data and tangible experience in order to<br />

reach an objective conclusion.”<br />

While supporting the movement of<br />

freight by all modes and recognising the<br />

environmental benefits of rail freight, CILT<br />

“Rejecting LHVs<br />

without physical<br />

trials is a wasted<br />

opportunity. The<br />

fact that the<br />

Secretary of State<br />

has used the emotive<br />

term<br />

‘super-lorry’<br />

suggests a biased<br />

approach”<br />

believes that LHVs could have a place in the<br />

transport hierarchy. “We believe it would be<br />

straightforward to identify a simple core<br />

network for trials, based around the motorway<br />

network,” said Agg.<br />

“Even if LHVs were approved it is likely<br />

that their usage would be limited and, in<br />

certain circumstances, they could actually<br />

make sense. To say we are disappointed<br />

with this announcement is an understatement.”<br />

Making<br />

light work<br />

Lighting can<br />

account for 50 -<br />

60 per cent of<br />

the electrical<br />

energy costs of<br />

warehouses and<br />

distribution<br />

centres. Somar<br />

has now<br />

introduced an<br />

intelligent<br />

lighting fixture<br />

which can<br />

deliver savings<br />

in the region of<br />

70 per cent.<br />

Not only is this<br />

a highly efficient<br />

luminaire,<br />

it also takes<br />

account of the<br />

fact that at most<br />

times, lighting<br />

is left on in all<br />

areas of a<br />

warehouse even<br />

when no one is<br />

working there.<br />

Additionally, in<br />

many<br />

warehouses<br />

although natural<br />

light is present<br />

through<br />

roof lights,<br />

lights are often<br />

fully on.<br />

Powerboss<br />

Eluma<br />

intelligently<br />

senses<br />

occupancy in<br />

each area<br />

and/or the<br />

change in<br />

natural light<br />

and adjusts the<br />

light level and<br />

electrical energy<br />

usage<br />

accordingly.<br />

www.somar.co.uk<br />

www.ukwa.org.uk June 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!