27.01.2015 Views

SG (Slot)

SG (Slot)

SG (Slot)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

fertilizer d~ill and ridger/ridge seeder. The objectives<br />

of preparatory tillage were good tilth, moisture<br />

conservation, weed free seed bed, residue management and<br />

seed and fertilizer placement.<br />

Adoption of preparatory ploughings by farmers and<br />

per cent difference from recommended practices are given in<br />

Table 1 as affected by different variables.<br />

On an average, there was' little difference (less than<br />

10%) between the recommended and the adopted practices in<br />

rice, wheat and cotton. In case of gram, farmers were<br />

carrying 15 per cent more ploughings than the recommended.<br />

Their view was that more ploughings helped them to conserve<br />

more soil moisture.<br />

Bioclimatic conditions:- Among different bioclimatic zones,<br />

farmers of·humid region were carrying 18 and 22 per cent<br />

more ploughings than the recommended in rice and wheat<br />

respectively. This might have been due to heavy texture<br />

of soil in this region (See Fig;l). F6r these cereals<br />

finer tilth is normally required for optimum germination<br />

and growth (Malik~· al. 1985). This study thus shows<br />

that tillage recommendations should be based on soil type<br />

and bioclimatic regions. In humid region, Sharma et. al.<br />

(1984) showed that direct seeding of wheat in paddy-wheat<br />

rotation by a specially designed single row seed drill gave<br />

as good yield as farmers' practice. It shows that with<br />

proper mechanisation of tillage, there is a great scope of<br />

reducing tillage operations in humid region and gram.<br />

Cultivation status:- Tenant cultivators were following<br />

recommended practices whereas the self-cultivators and<br />

manager-cultivators were doing more than recommended and<br />

less than recommended practices respectively. It was<br />

primarily due to the non-possession of tools and implements<br />

and hiring expenses by manager-cultivators; lesser interest<br />

of tenant-cultivators with poor motive of production and<br />

insecurity of tilling the same land next year and; to have<br />

land in the best tilth free from weeds and get maximum<br />

production from the resources at the command of selfcultivators.<br />

There is need to educate self-cultivators to<br />

reduce tillage practices and manager farmers to increase the<br />

same for different crops accordingly.<br />

Size of cultivated landholding:- Cultivators with the<br />

smallest and the largest size farms were performing tillage<br />

operations much near the recommended ones. Farmers with<br />

middle and upper middle size of landholding were doing<br />

relatively more tillage operations because of manageable<br />

size of farm and possession of tools and implements. Small<br />

farmers were either not having sufficient implements of<br />

their own or were cultivating leased-in-land as tenant<br />

cultivators. Findings of the study suggest that medium size<br />

farm is optimum for carrying out optimum operations but<br />

538

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!