27.01.2015 Views

Guidelines for second generation HIV surveillance - World Health ...

Guidelines for second generation HIV surveillance - World Health ...

Guidelines for second generation HIV surveillance - World Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2.3. Summary of methods <strong>for</strong> estimating population size (continued)<br />

Category 2: Methods based on data collected from the general population<br />

Method name and description Advantages Disadvantages<br />

Population survey methods with general<br />

population behaviour questions<br />

Network scale-up methods are based<br />

on the idea that people’s social networks<br />

reflect the general population.<br />

Ask a random sample in the general<br />

population to estimate the number of<br />

people they know, and how many of those<br />

people have the behaviour of interest.<br />

• Surveys are common and familiar.<br />

• Straight<strong>for</strong>ward to analyse and easy to<br />

explain to data users<br />

• Can generate estimates from the<br />

general population rather than hard-toreach<br />

populations<br />

• Individuals are often more likely to<br />

report on the behaviour of others<br />

instead of their own behaviour.<br />

• A single survey can be used to create<br />

a size estimate <strong>for</strong> multiple hidden<br />

populations.<br />

• Difficult to use when the behaviours are<br />

rare or stigmatized<br />

• Only reaches people residing in<br />

households, schools or other institutions<br />

used to create the sampling frame<br />

• Respondents are unlikely to admit to<br />

high risk or stigmatized behaviours<br />

if interview is not confidential or if<br />

interviewer is not skilled at establishing<br />

trust and rapport.<br />

• Average personal network size is<br />

difficult to estimate.<br />

• Subpopulations may not associate with<br />

members of the general population.<br />

• Respondent may be unaware that<br />

someone in his/her network engages in<br />

behaviour of interest.<br />

• Respondents may be hesitant to<br />

admit to knowing individuals with the<br />

specified behaviour.<br />

Evaluating a National Surveillance System<br />

Source: Adapted from Monitoring and evaluation guidelines <strong>for</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> prevention <strong>for</strong> men who have sex with men. MERG Technical Working Group on Most at Risk Populations.<br />

December 2009 (9).<br />

2.2.3. Step 3: Assess the levels of risk intensity among key populations at increased risk<br />

In geographical units where large numbers of people belonging to a key population at increased risk are<br />

concentrated, assess the level of risk intensity based on:<br />

• how frequently these populations engage in unprotected sex or inject drugs with non-sterile or<br />

contaminated needles/syringes (see Table 2.4)<br />

• how big the networks are of persons who use non-sterile/contaminated needles or have sexual<br />

partnerships.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!