Guidelines for second generation HIV surveillance - World Health ...
Guidelines for second generation HIV surveillance - World Health ...
Guidelines for second generation HIV surveillance - World Health ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 2.3. Summary of methods <strong>for</strong> estimating population size (continued)<br />
Category 2: Methods based on data collected from the general population<br />
Method name and description Advantages Disadvantages<br />
Population survey methods with general<br />
population behaviour questions<br />
Network scale-up methods are based<br />
on the idea that people’s social networks<br />
reflect the general population.<br />
Ask a random sample in the general<br />
population to estimate the number of<br />
people they know, and how many of those<br />
people have the behaviour of interest.<br />
• Surveys are common and familiar.<br />
• Straight<strong>for</strong>ward to analyse and easy to<br />
explain to data users<br />
• Can generate estimates from the<br />
general population rather than hard-toreach<br />
populations<br />
• Individuals are often more likely to<br />
report on the behaviour of others<br />
instead of their own behaviour.<br />
• A single survey can be used to create<br />
a size estimate <strong>for</strong> multiple hidden<br />
populations.<br />
• Difficult to use when the behaviours are<br />
rare or stigmatized<br />
• Only reaches people residing in<br />
households, schools or other institutions<br />
used to create the sampling frame<br />
• Respondents are unlikely to admit to<br />
high risk or stigmatized behaviours<br />
if interview is not confidential or if<br />
interviewer is not skilled at establishing<br />
trust and rapport.<br />
• Average personal network size is<br />
difficult to estimate.<br />
• Subpopulations may not associate with<br />
members of the general population.<br />
• Respondent may be unaware that<br />
someone in his/her network engages in<br />
behaviour of interest.<br />
• Respondents may be hesitant to<br />
admit to knowing individuals with the<br />
specified behaviour.<br />
Evaluating a National Surveillance System<br />
Source: Adapted from Monitoring and evaluation guidelines <strong>for</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> prevention <strong>for</strong> men who have sex with men. MERG Technical Working Group on Most at Risk Populations.<br />
December 2009 (9).<br />
2.2.3. Step 3: Assess the levels of risk intensity among key populations at increased risk<br />
In geographical units where large numbers of people belonging to a key population at increased risk are<br />
concentrated, assess the level of risk intensity based on:<br />
• how frequently these populations engage in unprotected sex or inject drugs with non-sterile or<br />
contaminated needles/syringes (see Table 2.4)<br />
• how big the networks are of persons who use non-sterile/contaminated needles or have sexual<br />
partnerships.<br />
15