28.01.2015 Views

Frontier Tanzania Environmental Research REPORT 110 ...

Frontier Tanzania Environmental Research REPORT 110 ...

Frontier Tanzania Environmental Research REPORT 110 ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Kazimzumbwi Forest Reserve<br />

50<br />

Sherman traps<br />

Small rodents and insectivores were sampled us ing 100 Sherman traps (standard size) baited with<br />

varying combinations of fried coconut and peanut butter and small fish (dagaa). Traps were<br />

placed at least 2m apart forming wide loops around the bucket pitfall trap lines; 33 around two of<br />

the lines and 34 around the other. Traps were baited each evening for the duration of the trapsite<br />

and checked early the next morning. Traps were closed during the day. Data were recorded on<br />

standardised data sheets regarding the identification, sex, breeding status, weight and biometrics<br />

of each animal captured. In order to identify ‘recaptures’, released animals were given an<br />

individual mark code made by trimming small patches of fur in a given pattern. Detailed habitat<br />

notes were taken for each trap.<br />

Mist-netting<br />

Bats were sampled using varying combinations and configurations of mistnets (1 x 3m, 2 x 7m, 1<br />

x 9m). Nets were placed across predicted ‘flight corridors’ such as rivers and paths, with the top<br />

of the net at a maximum height of 3m. Nets were opened at dusk and checked every 15 minutes<br />

for at least 3 hours each night that they were in use. Data were recorded on standardised data<br />

sheets regarding the identification, sex, breeding status, weight and biometrics of each bat<br />

captured. Detailed habitat notes were take n for each mist-netting location and the number of netmetre<br />

hours calculated (this varied between trapsites).<br />

Butterfly sweep-netting<br />

Low-flying butterflies were sampled using hand-held sweep-nets. Two man-hours were spent<br />

netting along the bucket pitfall lines each day for the duration of the trapsite.<br />

Butterfly canopy traps<br />

Butterflies were sampled using six canopy traps placed at varying heights within the canopy; two<br />

associated with each of the bucket pitfall trap lines. Traps were baited with fermenting banana<br />

and checked late afternon each day for the duration of the trapsite. Data were recorded on the<br />

identification of all species collected and detailed habitat notes taken for each trap, including its<br />

height within the canopy.<br />

Mollusc plots<br />

Molluscs were sampled in three 1m x 1m quadrats per trapsite; one established near each of the<br />

bucket pitfall trap lines and located in order to encompass a range of microhabitats. Two manhours<br />

were spent searching the leaf litter and first 3cm of soil within each quadrat. All molluscs<br />

encountered were collected.<br />

Millipede plots<br />

Millipedes were sampled in three 3m x 3m quadrats per trapsite; again, one established near each<br />

of the bucket pitfall trap lines and located in order to encompass a range of microhabitats. Four<br />

man-hours were spent searching the leaf litter and first 3cm of soil within each quadrat. All<br />

millipedes encountered were collected.<br />

6.3.2 DUNG AND SIGN SURVEYS<br />

More cryptic animals were surveyed along five transects of varying length (these transects were<br />

also used to investigate forest use and human impact, see Figure 5). The transects ran north-east<br />

to south-west through the reserve. Either side of the central transect line a 2m wide strip was<br />

searched for any animal dung, tracks, paths, burrows, diggings, feathers or other signs. All signs<br />

of animals were recorded and habitat notes were taken for each 50m stretch of transect.<br />

<strong>Frontier</strong>-<strong>Tanzania</strong>Coastal Forest <strong>Research</strong> Programme

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!