Current Trauma Status Report - Southern Nevada Health District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The most current projected population for Clark County is from the Center for Business and Economic Research at UNLV and shows an increase of 4 percent for the next two years. While the growth rate is projected to continue to grow, it will slow reaching 2.6 percent in 2012. The tables below show the projected population and change for the US, Nevada and Clark County. Exhibit 7 – Population Projections for US, Nevada and Clark County U.S. Population Projections, 2004-2012 Year U.S. Percent Change 2004 292,558,251 0.9% 2005 295,226,301 0.9% 2006 297,918,684 0.9% 2007 300,635,620 0.9% 2008 303,377,333 0.9% 2009 306,144,051 0.9% 2010 308,936,000 0.9% 2011 311,523,191 0.8% 2012 314,132,049 0.8% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, released March 2004 Nevada Population Projections, 2004-2012 Year Nevada Percent Change 2004 2,373,543 3.3% 2005 2,442,116 2.9% 2006 2,503,286 2.5% 2007 2,558,363 2.2% 2008 2,607,574 1.9% 2009 2,651,018 1.7% 2010 2,690,078 1.5% 2011 2,725,929 1.3% 2012 2,758,635 1.2% Source: Nevada State Demographer's Office, released April 2002 Draft Clark County Population Projections, 2004-2012 Year Clark County Percent Change 2004 1,709,449 4.1% 2005 1,777,291 4.0% 2006 1,843,451 3.7% 2007 1,908,139 3.5% 2008 1,971,102 3.3% 2009 2,032,378 3.1% 2010 2,092,013 2.9% 2011 2,150,075 2.8% 2012 2,206,118 2.6% Source: Center for Business & Economic Research at UNLV, released March 2004. As noted above, TAZ data projections are computed by the Southern Nevada Regional Transportation Commission. Current projections show that the majority of the growth in the Las Vegas region from 2003 to 2010 is expected in the south. A map depicting the projected population growth by TAZ is provided on the following page. The tables show the absolute change in projected population for TAZs with a projected growth of 1,000 people or more. Page 21
Exhibit 8 – Projected Population Change, 2003-2010 by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) Change 2003 TAZ to 2010 13 1,940 33 2,052 44 1,076 57 1,075 68 1,052 72 1,796 80 1,744 Total 10,734 Change 2003 TAZ to 2010 118 1,278 1149 1,171 Total 2,449 Change 2003 TAZ to 2010 104 1,019 199 2,162 255 2,158 256 2,215 260 1,427 261 1,585 263 1,400 264 1,039 265 2,019 270 1,212 272 1,108 273 1,870 274 1,206 275 1,617 277 2,331 278 2,051 595 3,083 715 1,608 Total 30,091 Change 2003 TAZ to 2010 870 4,036 871 1,853 873 3,356 885 3,703 954 3,898 955 2,089 960 1,559 1114 3,961 1116 2,159 Total 26,613 I 215 Source: Southern Nevada Regional Transportation Commission ; I 15 US 95 UMC Population Change (2003 - 2010) Within Traffic Analysis Zones > 2500 1,000 to 2,499 300 to 999 0 to 299 -300 to 0 Change 2003 to TAZ 2010 304 1,513 434 1,341 Total 2,854 Change 2003 TAZ to 2010 823 1,173 827 2,080 938 1,561 988 1,273 989 1,865 1030 1,083 1032 1,521 1033 1,267 1037 1,995 1081 2,685 1082 1,564 1083 1,660 1084 1,765 1088 1,801 1089 1,587 1090 1,393 1091 1,472 1129 2,192 1130 4,370 1132 1,975 1134 4,943 1135 5,964 1174 2,442 1179 2,344 1203 1,777 1205 1,773 1206 1,170 Total 56,691 Page 22
Page 1 and 2: SOUTHERN NEVADA CURRENT TRAUMA STAT
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Executive Summary
Page 5 and 6: Chronology of Trauma Care in Southe
Page 7 and 8: Exhibit 33 - Map Displaying Trauma
Page 9 and 10: • From January through April 2004
Page 11 and 12: Clearly trauma center staffing and
Page 13 and 14: A series of focus groups was also c
Page 15 and 16: • Information Management • Fina
Page 17 and 18: (This study did not attempt to meas
Page 19 and 20: County Health District Board of Hea
Page 21: on an average length of stay of 3.4
Page 25 and 26: Trauma Stakeholder Interview Result
Page 27 and 28: three years, and felt that a Level
Page 29 and 30: EMS providers ranked Acute Care Fac
Page 31 and 32: Town Hall Meeting Comments A series
Page 33 and 34: (CAAS) and the air ambulance provid
Page 35 and 36: Triage Criteria The determination o
Page 37 and 38: With the exception of the year 2000
Page 39 and 40: Exhibit 20 - Trauma Patients by Age
Page 41 and 42: The following chart shows that abou
Page 43 and 44: Exhibit 27 - Trauma Ground Transpor
Page 45 and 46: E codes enable the classification o
Page 47 and 48: The day of the week with the greate
Page 49 and 50: A different view of the 2002 trauma
Page 51 and 52: As part of The Abaris Group’s tra
Page 53 and 54: The table below summarizes the key
Page 55 and 56: All EMS and ED stakeholders appear
Page 57 and 58: Exhibit 43 - Specialty Physician Co
Page 59 and 60: Clark County Health District has id
Page 61 and 62: Trauma Center Standards by Level Th
Page 63 and 64: Nevada Trauma Registry Submission R
Page 65 and 66: Trauma Center Capacity Benchmark Da
Page 67 and 68: ED Diversion Hours by Hospital ED D
Page 69 and 70: • This region would not pass a ta
Page 71 and 72: • Instead of calling it a tax, we
Page 73 and 74:
Mesquite Town Hall Meeting The foll
Page 75 and 76:
North Las Vegas Town Hall Meeting T
Page 77 and 78:
Las Vegas Town Hall Meeting The fol
Page 79 and 80:
Trauma Center Funding Comparison St
Page 81 and 82:
Los Angeles County, CA Los Angeles
Page 83 and 84:
Chronology of Trauma Care in Southe
Page 85 and 86:
January 22, 1999 December 10, 2001
Page 87 and 88:
List of Trauma System Assessment St
Page 89 and 90:
Southern Nevada Trauma System Asses
Page 91 and 92:
to hospitals that accept Medicare r
Page 93 and 94:
ehabilitation - services that seek
show all

Current Trauma Status Report - Southern Nevada Health District

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?