28.01.2015 Views

BEN SCHOEMAN DOCK BERTH DEEPENING Specialist ... - Transnet

BEN SCHOEMAN DOCK BERTH DEEPENING Specialist ... - Transnet

BEN SCHOEMAN DOCK BERTH DEEPENING Specialist ... - Transnet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Intensity:<br />

This predicts whether the impact is destructive or innocuous and<br />

is described as low (where environmental functions and/or processes are negligibly<br />

altered), medium (where the environment continues to function but in a modified<br />

manner), or high (where environmental functions and/or processes are severely altered).<br />

Probability: Here the likelihood of the impact occurring is assessed as<br />

improbable (90% chance that the impact will<br />

occur).<br />

The status of the identified impacts and the degree of confidence in the predictions are<br />

also given as follows:<br />

Status of impact: Classification of the impact as positive (a benefit), negative (a<br />

cost), or neutral.<br />

Confidence: The degree of confidence that can be invested in the predictions<br />

based on the available information and specialist knowledge.<br />

When impacts are identified as negative with a significance rating of medium or higher,<br />

or precaution should be applied, mitigation objectives are set (i.e. ways of reducing<br />

negative impacts), and attainable mitigation actions recommended. In the case where<br />

mitigation is not feasible or necessary, this will be stated as such.<br />

Monitoring procedures and review programmes to assess the effectiveness of mitigation<br />

are recommended.<br />

6.2 Assessment of potential environmental Impacts<br />

In this assessment the risk factors and associated effects listed in section 4 are matched<br />

against the environmental attributes and features described in section 5. This allows<br />

identification of potential impacts and their evaluation according to the criteria set out in<br />

section 6.1. The potential impacts are partitioned by location where the effects<br />

(stressors) originate, i.e. the dredge area within Ben Schoeman Dock, the candidate<br />

dredge spoil disposal sites, and adjacent environments. The impacts are further divided<br />

by activity; i.e. dredging and blasting in the dredge area and spoil dumping at the<br />

disposal sites.<br />

6.2.1 Harbour dredge area: dredging<br />

6.2.1.1 Removal of biological communities in the dredge target areas<br />

During the proposed dredging approximately 1.2 million cubic metres of sediment will be<br />

dredged from the port. These sediments will have marine biota associated with them<br />

which will be removed along with the dredge spoil. There is a marked gradient within the<br />

port in biofouling organisms on harbour structures, biomass declining rapidly with<br />

distance from the harbour entrance. There are no reported surveys on spatial<br />

distributions of benthos in the sediments but spot sampling in Duncan Dock, Victoria<br />

Basin and Alfred Dock showed a complete absence of fauna (CMS 1995a). This was<br />

attributed to anoxic sediments and hydrocarbon pollution. Such a severe situation is not<br />

expected for Ben Schoeman Dock Basin sediments, as indicated by AVS and<br />

hydrocarbon concentrations, but it is likely that the soft sediment benthos is<br />

impoverished.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!