28.01.2015 Views

Kouli_etal_2008_Groundwater modelling_BOOK.pdf - Pantelis ...

Kouli_etal_2008_Groundwater modelling_BOOK.pdf - Pantelis ...

Kouli_etal_2008_Groundwater modelling_BOOK.pdf - Pantelis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

98<br />

Sabrina Saponaro, Sara Puricelli, Elena Sezenna et al.<br />

Model Verification<br />

The model was verified by comparing pilot test simulations and field measurements.<br />

Concerning AS test, field water mounding Δh l in P AS and PZ AS was interpreted as water<br />

pressure increase with respect to natural conditions at a depth equal to half of the screen wells<br />

(-23.5 m g.s. for P AS , -20.5 m g.s. for PZ AS ); since no porous materials are present in wells, P c<br />

is negligible and P l = P g , therefore Δh l can be calculated from simulation results as the<br />

variation between P g at time of concern and natural condition, divided by (ρ l g). Δh l resulting<br />

from the model was plotted versus the distance from P AS ; through linear extrapolation to Δh l<br />

= 0, ZOI AS,pil from model resulted in 8.3 m [Fig. 7(a)], in agreement with field data.<br />

Figure 7. Linear extrapolation of Δh l during the AS pilot test (a) and ΔP g during the SVE pilot test (b)<br />

vs distance from injection/extraction well (>: value from the model at the monitoring wells; ---: linear<br />

interpolation).<br />

Concerning SVE pilot test, ΔP g was obtained as the difference between the P g value at<br />

stationary conditions under operation and P g at natural conditions resulting at half depth of<br />

the screen of the monitoring wells PZ SVE (-8.5 m g.s.); these values were plotted as a function<br />

of the distance of PZ SVE from P SVE , and linearly extrapolated to ΔP g = 0 Pa, resulting in a<br />

simulated ZOI SVE,pil = 17.6 m [Fig. 7(b)], in agreement with field data.<br />

AS and SVE Flow Rates<br />

Fig. 8 shows air saturation at stationary conditions over a semi-section parallel to the XZ<br />

plane passing through P AS , for simulations where P AS was active at different injection flow<br />

rates (Q V,AS : 5 to 20 Nm 3 h -1 ). The isoline S g = 0.01 (or S l = 0.99) delimits water saturated<br />

zone; S g = 0.20 is the maximum value of gas saturation resulting from the simulations. The<br />

dashed black line shows water table at natural conditions (no air injection), the brown one<br />

delimits pollution in soil. As expected (USACE, <strong>2008</strong>), as Q V,AS grows the extension of the<br />

zone nearby P AS partially saturated by air becomes larger; nevertheless, S g values higher than<br />

0.1 (black continue line) can be obtained only for Q V,AS ≥ 10 Nm 3 h -1 next to the screened part<br />

of P AS .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!