28.01.2015 Views

Kouli_etal_2008_Groundwater modelling_BOOK.pdf - Pantelis ...

Kouli_etal_2008_Groundwater modelling_BOOK.pdf - Pantelis ...

Kouli_etal_2008_Groundwater modelling_BOOK.pdf - Pantelis ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

136<br />

Marek Šváb and Lenka Wimmerová<br />

approach is the fact that there is no limit in terms of complexity of the system to be modeled.<br />

Simply, with increasing complexity of the system, the model semi-empirical parameters can<br />

be modified in order to allow its experimental determination. The other advantage is the<br />

possibility to model dynamic systems as well. The disadvantage of this approach consists of<br />

the necessity to experimentally determine input data, which disables the transfer of the data to<br />

other systems.<br />

For a better explanation of the semi-empirical approach, let us consider the following<br />

example. One of the widely used methods in water treatment is active carbon adsorption,<br />

which can be used for removing various species from water, e.g. m<strong>etal</strong> ions and organic<br />

pollutants [2]. Various curves can be used for quantification of the relation between the<br />

equilibrium concentration of the adsorbate in the solution and its sorbed amount. In most<br />

cases, Freundlich or Langmuir isotherms are applied [3]; however, these isotherms do not<br />

reflect particular sorption mechanisms and reactions that really occur on the sorbent surface.<br />

Active carbon has a very complex structure, with a number of various active surface groups<br />

that are responsible for its sorption properties. If we want to apply the exact approach, it<br />

would be necessary to measure all particular reactions between these various groups and the<br />

adsorbate. Since this task would be very complicated, we can decide not to consider all<br />

particular reactions, but to measure only an equilibrium state in the particular system of active<br />

carbon-pollutant and to characterize it through a suitable curve, e.g. Langmuir, Freundlich or<br />

another mathematical function. The fact should also be considered that the Langmuir model<br />

was prepared especially for the well-defined model adsorbents with one type of a uniform<br />

surface reaction site, and thus its use for description of the sorption equilibrium on activated<br />

carbon is groundless. However, the fact that it often provides good interpolation of measured<br />

data is why the Langmuir curve is so popular. Although the model cannot be used for other<br />

adsorbates and/or adsorbents, we can carry out the equilibrium calculations for various<br />

concentrations, suggest a batch water-treatment system, make the first estimate of a suitable<br />

dynamic system (a sorption filter), and at least partly understand the behavior of the system.<br />

A similar approach represents a distribution coefficient for quantification of the<br />

distribution of species between the solid and liquid phase, which is frequently used in the<br />

description of interactions between soil and groundwater. From the point of view of the solid<br />

phase, soil represents one of the most complex matrixes containing both various types of<br />

inorganic components (clays, sand, silt, etc.) and of organic matter (fulvic acids, humic acid,<br />

etc.). Soil composition results in a number of various possible surface interactions and<br />

reactions, which are almost impossible to define. Furthermore, in the case of toxic m<strong>etal</strong>s, a<br />

number of different forms in which the m<strong>etal</strong>s can be present in soil are known. Finally,<br />

although the distribution coefficient does not reflect the mechanisms of the interactions<br />

between the phases, it provides relatively reliable data for the particular soil and groundwater.<br />

The third type of <strong>modelling</strong> approach of the water-solid interactions is the empirical one.<br />

It is typical for this approach that we accept our studied system as a ‘black box’. The<br />

empirical approach needs experimental measuring of the system, observation of its reaction<br />

on modified surrounding conditions, and interpolation of measured data by a suitable<br />

empirical equation. The advantage of the empirical model consists in possibly dealing with<br />

the complex and dynamic systems, although transferability of data is very limited. The data<br />

and results are valid strictly for the same conditions and the range of modified parameters as<br />

those used in the experimental measuring.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!