The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 37, no. 4
The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 37, no. 4
The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 37, no. 4
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHARLES ABEL CORWIN Portrait <strong>of</strong> Whister, 1880<br />
Reverie, most likely a portrait <strong>of</strong> his wife,<br />
and probably from about 1895, is a<br />
masterful image equal to his work in oils.<br />
<strong>The</strong> freedom and assurance <strong>of</strong> his bravura<br />
strokes <strong>of</strong> wiped area are even more<br />
spontaneous and tactile in the face, where<br />
the artist's use <strong>of</strong> the thumb is evident on<br />
close observation. <strong>The</strong> obvious emotional<br />
junction with the print's large size, gives<br />
this mo<strong>no</strong>type an extraordinary impact.<br />
Frank Duveneck and the group <strong>of</strong><br />
American artist-friends studying with him<br />
in Venice also employed the technique in<br />
1880. During one <strong>of</strong> their gatherings a<br />
student, Charles Abel Corwin, caught a<br />
distinguished visitor, Whistler, in a con-<br />
bold appearance <strong>of</strong> the artist's thumbprint<br />
in the face, and the stark highlighting <strong>of</strong><br />
Whistler's shirt and coat, pr<strong>of</strong>ile, and<br />
dramatic lock <strong>of</strong> white hair. Himself a<br />
skilled printmaker, Whistler was in Venice<br />
to work on his famous First Venice Set <strong>of</strong><br />
etchings. His exposure to the mo<strong>no</strong>type<br />
process may have influenced the painterly