14.02.2015 Views

The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 37, no. 4

The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 37, no. 4

The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, v. 37, no. 4

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHARLES ABEL CORWIN Portrait <strong>of</strong> Whister, 1880<br />

Reverie, most likely a portrait <strong>of</strong> his wife,<br />

and probably from about 1895, is a<br />

masterful image equal to his work in oils.<br />

<strong>The</strong> freedom and assurance <strong>of</strong> his bravura<br />

strokes <strong>of</strong> wiped area are even more<br />

spontaneous and tactile in the face, where<br />

the artist's use <strong>of</strong> the thumb is evident on<br />

close observation. <strong>The</strong> obvious emotional<br />

junction with the print's large size, gives<br />

this mo<strong>no</strong>type an extraordinary impact.<br />

Frank Duveneck and the group <strong>of</strong><br />

American artist-friends studying with him<br />

in Venice also employed the technique in<br />

1880. During one <strong>of</strong> their gatherings a<br />

student, Charles Abel Corwin, caught a<br />

distinguished visitor, Whistler, in a con-<br />

bold appearance <strong>of</strong> the artist's thumbprint<br />

in the face, and the stark highlighting <strong>of</strong><br />

Whistler's shirt and coat, pr<strong>of</strong>ile, and<br />

dramatic lock <strong>of</strong> white hair. Himself a<br />

skilled printmaker, Whistler was in Venice<br />

to work on his famous First Venice Set <strong>of</strong><br />

etchings. His exposure to the mo<strong>no</strong>type<br />

process may have influenced the painterly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!