- Page 4 and 5: ! Off. Ser. No. 2 .. . ._ SECTION I
- Page 6 and 7: , I I area in Ladakh. In the latter
- Page 8 and 9: .. "to meet" anybody, anywhere. It
- Page 10 and 11: I _I when British-educated, first-c
- Page 12 and 13: _- -TO 1 THE SINO-INDIAN BORDER DIS
- Page 14 and 15: Indian military figures such as Thi
- Page 16 and 17: . . 1 asserted, was merely an exten
- Page 18 and 19: (footnote continued from page 0) ,-
- Page 20 and 21: .' (3) Personal talks with Chou En-
- Page 22 and 23: concerted Opposition attack on Defe
- Page 24 and 25: I -=0 I Chou made two pyoposals whi
- Page 26 and 27: on the facts. Presumably, low-level
- Page 28 and 29: , 'A. , ' i I .. , , '.. . .. "a ce
- Page 30 and 31: . . rejection, virtually ignoring t
- Page 32 and 33: means of friendly negotiations."* H
- Page 34 and 35: level talks without Chinese withdra
- Page 36 and 37: I 1 ' ' 1 Prior to October 1959, th
- Page 38 and 39: ..' .1' , . ' I-' . ! , . . ' . .I
- Page 40 and 41: .. Chou En-lai sought to blur the s
- Page 42 and 43: I I The Chinese indicated no desire
- Page 44 and 45: I . The August and October 1959 cla
- Page 46 and 47: Prime Minister had maintained that
- Page 48 and 49: provide them with an important prop
- Page 50 and 51: I I .1 ' probe Chinese long-term in
- Page 52 and 53:
.. . . I, v impression that the Ind
- Page 54 and 55:
. . established a joint commission
- Page 56 and 57:
. . I watershed--and Nehru expresse
- Page 58 and 59:
. . 1 . , I I . . " . - anticipated
- Page 60 and 61:
I I 1 . . ,, I examine, check, and
- Page 62 and 63:
might provoke border incidents. I I
- Page 64 and 65:
I ~ I I no boundary markings, makin
- Page 66 and 67:
1 .. . . . . .. ' i ~ , . . 1 to aw
- Page 68 and 69:
- Repeatedly, it stressed that a re
- Page 70 and 71:
.& , . . I .. . of Chinese lvcarele
- Page 72 and 73:
.C . 1 I Chinese posts, but also di
- Page 74 and 75:
In the early days of April 1960, th
- Page 76 and 77:
. . 6. In order to ensure tranquili
- Page 78 and 79:
' '. .. , . By 5 Ootober, the date
- Page 80 and 81:
.. conflicting claims in Ladakh wer
- Page 82 and 83:
.- with the same vigor as they argu
- Page 84 and 85:
. . case had proven to be strong-st
- Page 86 and 87:
areas the Chinese claimed on their
- Page 88 and 89:
I ..- . . The Chinese desire for so
- Page 90 and 91:
-- . . warned diplomatic personnel
- Page 92 and 93:
Chinese Claim ' Lines' of 1956 and