06.03.2015 Views

The Sino-Indian Border Dispute Section 2: 1959-61 - The Black Vault

The Sino-Indian Border Dispute Section 2: 1959-61 - The Black Vault

The Sino-Indian Border Dispute Section 2: 1959-61 - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

..'<br />

.1' , .<br />

' I-'<br />

. !<br />

, .<br />

. '<br />

. .I<br />

. ,<br />

.. ,<br />

message of 14 September to Peiping, Premier Ba Swe welcomed<br />

Chou's promise to withdraw the troops and agreed to keep<br />

Burmese troops out of the area. However, he insisted on the<br />

validity of the Wa States boundary as demarcated by Nationalist<br />

China and Britain in 1941 and on the validity of the<br />

Kachin State border farther north as a de facto line, and<br />

complained that Chinese troops had also?rm the border<br />

at the northern tip of the state and should be withdrawn.<br />

He then stated that Burma would accept the establishment<br />

of a joint boundary commission--actually an earlier Burmese<br />

proposal--which would examine the Kachin frontier and make<br />

"recommendat ions to the respective governments. On the<br />

suggestion of Hla Maung in Peiping, Chou En-lai--who was<br />

anxious to undercut Burmese press attacks--in early Sepeember<br />

invited U Nu to lead a delegation to China to discuss<br />

the dispute. <strong>The</strong> Burmese stressed, however, that U Nu<br />

would go only in an '*unofficialf1 capacity and would not<br />

represent the government in discussions with Chou--i.e.<br />

his statements would not prejudice Ba Swe's firm position.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Burmese hoped for informal proposals leading to<br />

an acceptable settlement and Chou fostered the impression<br />

that China was prepared to make them. During talks with<br />

the U Nu delegation in November 1956, Chou made a "proposal<br />

about principles" relating to three sections of the border<br />

still in dispute. (1) Regarding the "1941 line" in the Wa<br />

States area, Chou indicated readiness to withdraw Chinese<br />

troops and asked that "pending a final agreement on the<br />

line and the setting up of boundary markers," Burmese troops<br />

not enter the evacuated area. Chou and Ba Swe had in fact<br />

agreed privately on this matter in September. (2) Regarding<br />

the Namwan leased tract, Chou was prepared to negotiate so<br />

as to decide on conCrete steps to abrogate the "perpetual<br />

lease.1f (3) Regarding the northern border, the section<br />

from the Isurazi Pass nrmthward to the Diphu Pass was to<br />

be demarcated along the "traditional boundary line" and<br />

from the Izurazi Pass to the High Conical Peak was to be<br />

determined along the watershed. <strong>The</strong> Hpimaw tract of three<br />

villages-Hpimaw, Kangf ang, and Gawlun--vas to be "returned"<br />

to China, and Burmese troops in the area were to withdraw<br />

at the same time that Chinese troops were retiring from the<br />

"1941 line1' farther south. In sum, Chou indicated that<br />

Peiping was prepared to withdraw in the Wa States and yield<br />

- 27 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!