Environment Report - Santos
Environment Report - Santos
Environment Report - Santos
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2. Regulatory Framework<br />
<strong>Environment</strong> Effects Statement for a development<br />
proposal. In determining the<br />
application of the <strong>Environment</strong> Effects<br />
Act 1978 to a development proposal, the<br />
Minister for Planning must take into account:<br />
• The character of the receiving environment.<br />
• Any potential impacts of the proposal.<br />
• The resilience of the environment to<br />
cope with change.<br />
• The level of confidence in impact prediction.<br />
• The presence of planning or policy<br />
framework.<br />
• Statutory decision-making processes.<br />
• The degree of public interest.<br />
The Minister for Planning has determined<br />
that the magnitude and significance of<br />
potential impacts would not necessitate<br />
the preparation of an EES on the basis<br />
that:<br />
• The coastal crossing is adjacent to<br />
that of the Minerva Project, using similar<br />
horizontal directional drill (HDD)<br />
techniques including drilling from outside<br />
the Port Campbell National Park.<br />
• Construction of the onshore pipeline<br />
is adjacent to, or within, existing gas<br />
pipeline easements 1 .<br />
• The existing TXU gas plant is used<br />
for processing of the Casino field gas.<br />
• An <strong>Environment</strong> <strong>Report</strong> describing<br />
the potential impacts of the pipeline<br />
development and proposed environment<br />
management measures is to<br />
be prepared by <strong>Santos</strong> to the satisfaction<br />
of the Department of<br />
Sustainability and <strong>Environment</strong> (DSE)<br />
and the Department of Primary Industries<br />
(DPI), and then exhibited for<br />
public comment in conjunction with<br />
the pipeline permit application.<br />
• A report on the environmental outcomes<br />
of the project to the post-construction<br />
stage is to be provided to<br />
DSE (and DPI) by <strong>Santos</strong>.<br />
Accordingly, this <strong>Environment</strong> <strong>Report</strong> has<br />
been prepared in support of the pipeline<br />
permit application under the Pipelines<br />
Act 1967, which will only be granted following<br />
advice on the project from the<br />
Minister for Planning and the Minister for<br />
<strong>Environment</strong> and Conservation.<br />
2.2.3 Planning and <strong>Environment</strong><br />
Act 1987<br />
In Victoria, planning approvals are governed<br />
by the Planning and <strong>Environment</strong><br />
Act 1987. This Act regulates the use and<br />
development of land through planning<br />
schemes and the granting of planning<br />
permits.<br />
The onshore part of the pipeline for the<br />
Casino Gas Field Development is located<br />
within the Corangamite Shire and<br />
traverses land zoned as environmental<br />
rural zone (ERZ), rural use zone (RUZ)<br />
and special use zone (SUZ) 2 . By definition,<br />
a pipeline development in these<br />
zones would require a planning permit<br />
as a utility installation. However, by virtue<br />
of Section 12(h) of the Pipelines Act<br />
1967, separate planning approvals are<br />
not required as land use is taken into<br />
account when approving the pipeline<br />
route.<br />
Under the Pipelines Act 1967, ancillary<br />
facilities such as valve stations are<br />
deemed to be appurtenances to the pipeline<br />
and are not gas processing facilities<br />
as such, and do not require separate<br />
planning approval.<br />
2.2.4 Coastal Management Act 1995<br />
Installation of the pipeline on the seabed<br />
within Victorian waters (out to the 3-nm<br />
limit) and by horizontal directional drilling<br />
beneath the surface of the Port<br />
Campbell National Park (i.e., coastal<br />
Crown Land) will require consent for the<br />
use and development of coastal Crown<br />
Land. An application will be lodged with<br />
the Department of Sustainability and <strong>Environment</strong><br />
under Part 4, Sections 37 and<br />
38 of the Coastal Management Act 1985.<br />
2.2.5 Native Title<br />
The Commonwealth Native Title Act 1993<br />
applies indigenous Native Title rights,<br />
unless extinguished by freehold title or<br />
the validation of certain acts. The Act<br />
also sets out procedural requirements<br />
and potential entitlements to compensation<br />
when an action may impact on native<br />
title rights. The Pipeline Permit<br />
cannot be granted by the minister until<br />
DPI are satisfied that a relevant procedure<br />
under the Commonwealth Native<br />
Title Act 1993 has been followed.<br />
<strong>Santos</strong> has sought advice from the DSE<br />
Crown Land Management on an appropriate<br />
process who advised that a notification<br />
and acquisition process should<br />
be pursued under Section 24KA of the<br />
Native Title Act 1993. This involves:<br />
1. Notification of intentions to seek<br />
easements over land that may be subject<br />
to native title and invitation to<br />
make a submission on the proposed<br />
activity in relation to their native title<br />
rights and interests.<br />
2. If there are no registered native title<br />
claimants, Native Title Services Victoria,<br />
an indigenous community native<br />
title representative body, has 28<br />
days to make a submission on behalf<br />
of any other person or party that they<br />
certify as having a relevant native title<br />
interest in the area concerned.<br />
3. <strong>Santos</strong> Ltd must address all submissions<br />
that are received within the 28-<br />
day period, and attempt to resolve<br />
any relevant issues that have been<br />
raised.<br />
4. Victorian Government policy allows a<br />
period of up to 6-months, from the<br />
date of the notice, for resolution of<br />
issues.<br />
5. The Manager of the Indigenous Land<br />
and Resource Management Policy<br />
Unit of DSE will accept that submissions<br />
have been resolved where there<br />
is evidence that native title parties<br />
agree to the future act. Alternatively,<br />
where a resolution can not be reached<br />
<strong>Santos</strong> must provide evidence that<br />
negotiations have been conducted in<br />
good faith.<br />
There are currently no native title claims<br />
over any areas affected by the Casino<br />
Gas Field Development.<br />
Additional to the requirements of the Native<br />
Title Act, the preservation and protection<br />
of Aboriginal areas, sites or<br />
objects is afforded under the provisions<br />
of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander<br />
Heritage Protection Act 1984. This<br />
Commonwealth Act supplements the<br />
state heritage protection legislation,<br />
namely the Victorian Archaeological and<br />
Aboriginal Relics Preservation Act 1988.<br />
The provisions of these acts with regard<br />
to heritage approvals are applied during<br />
the environmental assessment of route<br />
investigations and impacts prior to the<br />
granting of project approvals.<br />
1 In its submission to DPI <strong>Santos</strong> committed to<br />
following existing easements, where practicable.<br />
Where technical or landuse considerations prevent<br />
the use of existing easements the pipeline alignment<br />
has been selected in consultation with relevant<br />
landholders and regulatory authorities.<br />
2 Shire of Corangamite Planning Scheme.<br />
Casino Gas Field Development 7