21.03.2015 Views

Environment Report - Santos

Environment Report - Santos

Environment Report - Santos

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. Project Description<br />

Table 5.2<br />

Preliminary assessment of shore crossing options<br />

Criteria Option 1<br />

Flaxman’s Hill<br />

Option 2<br />

Lover’s Nook<br />

Option 3<br />

Newfield Bay<br />

Option 4<br />

Two Mile Bay<br />

#1 Horizontal<br />

directional drill<br />

Unknown geotechnical<br />

conditions.<br />

Unknown geotechnical<br />

conditions.<br />

Unknown geotechnical<br />

conditions.<br />

Required drill length (to 15-m<br />

water depth) from outside<br />

Port Campbell National Park<br />

exceeds the current technical<br />

limit for HDD. Therefore, this<br />

option carries significant<br />

technical risk.<br />

Co-located with Minerva and<br />

Otway Gas Project shore<br />

crossings. Known<br />

geotechnical conditions<br />

(Minerva HDD geological<br />

profile has been made<br />

available to <strong>Santos</strong> (<strong>Santos</strong><br />

is a joint venture partner in<br />

the Minerva Project). Key<br />

stakeholders indicated<br />

support for concept of colocation<br />

of shore crossing<br />

site. Required drill length<br />

within technical limits.<br />

#2 Offshore<br />

<strong>Environment</strong><br />

Bathymetry indicates<br />

significant reef outcrops<br />

and rocky seafloor<br />

conditions between gas<br />

field and shore. Confirmed<br />

by commercial fishers<br />

during consultation and<br />

offshore bathymetry<br />

survey.<br />

Bathymetry indicates<br />

significant reef outcrops and<br />

rocky seafloor conditions<br />

between gas field and shore.<br />

Confirmed by commercial<br />

fishers during consultation<br />

and offshore bathymetry<br />

survey.<br />

Bathymetry indicates<br />

significant reef outcrops and<br />

rocky seafloor conditions<br />

between gas field and shore.<br />

Confirmed by commercial<br />

fishers during consultation<br />

and offshore bathymetry<br />

survey.<br />

Bathymetry east of Casino<br />

gas field and near Minerva<br />

indicates significant areas of<br />

sandy seafloor. Confirmed by<br />

commercial fishers during<br />

consultation and offshore<br />

bathymetry survey.<br />

#3<br />

Commercial<br />

Fisheries<br />

Offshore pipeline would<br />

traverse good lobster<br />

fishing grounds.<br />

Creates new pipeline<br />

corridor.<br />

Offshore pipeline would<br />

traverse good lobster fishing<br />

grounds.<br />

Creates new pipeline<br />

corridor.<br />

Offshore pipeline would<br />

traverse good lobster fishing<br />

grounds.<br />

Creates new pipeline<br />

corridor.<br />

Offshore pipeline can avoid<br />

main lobster grounds.<br />

Co-location with Minerva and<br />

Otway Gas Project pipeline<br />

and therefore limits snagging<br />

hazards to one corridor.<br />

Commercial fishers indicated<br />

preference for this option<br />

over others.<br />

#4 Onshore<br />

<strong>Environment</strong><br />

Requires crossing of<br />

Curdies River and<br />

Campbells Creek (both<br />

using existing easements).<br />

Greenfield shore crossing.<br />

Potential for approximately<br />

90% of onshore pipeline<br />

route to follow existing<br />

easements.<br />

Requires crossing of Curdie<br />

River and Campbells Creek<br />

(both using existing<br />

easement). Greenfield shore<br />

crossing. Potential<br />

approximately 90% of<br />

onshore pipeline route to<br />

follow existing easements.<br />

Requires crossing of<br />

Campbells Creek (using<br />

existing easement).<br />

Greenfield shore crossing.<br />

Potential for approximately<br />

80% of onshore pipeline<br />

route to follow existing<br />

easements.<br />

Requires crossing of<br />

Campbells Creek (using<br />

existing easement). Shore<br />

crossing consolidated with<br />

Minerva and Woodside<br />

Otway Gas projects.<br />

Potential to follow existing<br />

easement for 90% of<br />

onshore pipeline route.<br />

or adjacent to existing easements, where<br />

practicable, two options are available<br />

from the HDD site to Smokey Point Road<br />

and three sub-options are then available<br />

from here to the TXU WUGS facility.<br />

Note that the naming protocol for the<br />

various onshore pipeline route options<br />

uses ‘Option 4’ followed by either the<br />

word ‘Minerva’ or ‘Otway’ (depending on<br />

which alignment it follows) and the suboptions<br />

are identified as ‘4A, B or C’.<br />

Between the preferred HDD shore crossing<br />

site at Two Mile Bay (Option 4) and<br />

Smokey Point Road, there are two options<br />

(Figure 5.3):<br />

• Option 4 (Minerva) – follows the existing<br />

Minerva pipeline easement to<br />

the Minerva gas plant and then the<br />

SEAgas pipeline to Smokey Point<br />

Road.<br />

• Option 4 (Otway) – follows the proposed<br />

Woodside Otway Gas Project<br />

alignment to Smokey Point Road.<br />

Between the Smokey Point Road and<br />

the existing TXU WUGS facility, there<br />

are three sub-options (see Figure 5.3):<br />

• 4A – Crosses north over Smokey<br />

Point Road and Cheynes Road South<br />

and follows the existing GasNet Iona<br />

to Portland pipeline into the TXU<br />

WUGS facility.<br />

• 4B – Follows the SEAgas pipeline<br />

from Smokey Point Road into the TXU<br />

WUGS facility.<br />

• 4C – Follows the proposed Woodside<br />

Otway gas pipeline from Smokey<br />

Point Road into the TXU WUGS facility.<br />

Selection of the Preferred Onshore<br />

Pipeline Alignment<br />

The selection and assessment process<br />

for the route alignment was based on:<br />

• <strong>Environment</strong>al impact assessment –<br />

studies of the various alignments<br />

have been conducted by specialist<br />

consultants, based on desktop and<br />

field investigations. The field studies<br />

were undertaken at the end of summer<br />

2004 and included investigations<br />

of:<br />

– Ecology (flora, fauna and stream<br />

ecology).<br />

Casino Gas Field Development 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!