Reproductive Ecology and Body Burden of Resident ... - The Love Lab

More documents

Recommendations

Info

G 5.0 Kelp rockfish H 20 Platform Natural Cu/Ca (μmol/mol), 95% Cl 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0 N= 39 Platform 58 Natural Cu/Ca (μmol/mol), 95% Cl 10 0 -10 N= 8 9 10 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 PTC WSB ESB OEC SCB I 1.8 J 3.0 Ba/Ca (μmol/mol), 95% Cl 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0 N= 39 58 Platform Natural Habitat Ba/Ca (μmol/mol), 95% Cl 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 N= 8 9 10 11 11 10 10 10 10 10 PTC WSB ESB OEC SCB Figure 3. (Continued) 43
Kelp rockfish otolith Sr Ca -1 significantly differed between habitats and among areas; however, there was a significant interaction between the two factors (Table 2) and the Tamhane test did not detect differences among areas. In contrast to otolith Mg Ca -1 , Sr Ca -1 was lower at platforms than natural areas (Fig. 3C). One-way ANOVA found differences among sites (Table 3). Otolith Sr Ca -1 was lowest from two platforms, Gilda and Edith in the areas OEC and SCB, respectively, compared to all other sites (Tamhane test, p
Page 1:
Pacific Outer Continental Shelf Reg
Page 4 and 5:
Disclaimer This report had been rev
Page 6 and 7:
TECHNICAL SUMMARY Study Title: Repr
Page 8 and 9: interactions between total length (
Page 10 and 11: REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND BODY BURDE
Page 12 and 13: tometry. The determination of selen
Page 14 and 15: Task 3: A Histological Examination
Page 16 and 17: Task 1: Whole-body Concentrations o
Page 18 and 19: Study Area and Methods The study ar
Page 20 and 21: Sample Collection Fish species cons
Page 22 and 23: to confirm the calibration status o
Page 24 and 25: variation in elemental concentratio
Page 26 and 27: Table 2. Summary of fish vital stat
Page 28 and 29: Table 3. Variation in total length,
Page 30 and 31: Cadmium. Cadmium concentrations in
Page 32 and 33: Iron. Iron concentrations in the th
Page 34 and 35: Nickel. None of the three fish spec
Page 36 and 37: Strontium. None of the three fish s
Page 38 and 39: Vanadium. Kelp bass and kelp rockfi
Page 40 and 41: came from an oil platform (PL4, 3 o
Page 42 and 43: Table 4. Comparisons of selected tr
Page 44 and 45: Literature Cited Allen, M.J., D.W.
Page 46 and 47: May, T.W., J.F. Fairchild, J.D. Pet
Page 48 and 49: Task 2: Otolith Elemental Signature
Page 50 and 51: sider the ecology of species of int
Page 52 and 53: Table 1. Characteristics of the 18
Page 54 and 55: an undetectable amount of an isotop
Page 56 and 57: Table 2. Two-way ANOVA comparing tr
Page 60 and 61: Table 4A. Correlations of predictor
Page 62 and 63: CDA generated a model discriminatin
Page 64 and 65: Pacific sanddab otolith elemental s
Page 66 and 67: A 0.034 Pacific Sanddab B 0.10 Plat
Page 68 and 69: Table 7. One-way ANOVA comparing tr
Page 70 and 71: Table 9A. Correlations of six predi
Page 72 and 73: Kelp rockfish Otolith (element/Ca (
Page 74 and 75: Discussion Results from univariate
Page 76 and 77: of non-drilling associated discharg
Page 78 and 79: ture and salinity on otolith elemen
Page 80 and 81: Miller, J. A and A. L. Shanks. 2004
Page 82 and 83: Appendix 2. Seawater element-to-cal
Page 84 and 85: Appendix 3. Seawater element-to-cal
Page 86 and 87: Task 3: A Histological Examination
Page 88 and 89: Table 1. Details of Pacific sanddab
Page 90 and 91: Figure 2. A) Ovary of Pacific sandd
Page 92 and 93: Literature Cited Allen, M. J. 1982.
show all

Reproductive Ecology and Body Burden of Resident ... - The Love Lab

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?