Reproductive Ecology and Body Burden of Resident ... - The Love Lab

Table 5A. Correlations of predictor variables (Sr Ca -1 , Ba Ca -1 , and Mg Ca -1 in otoliths; log (x+1) transformed), with discriminant functions,
DF (canonical loadings) used to classify kelp rockfish to ten collection sites.
Element Ca -1
Canonical loadings
DF1 DF2 DF3
Ba Ca -1 -0.445 0.895 0.040
Sr Ca -1 0.592 0.800 0.099
Mg Ca -1 -0.309 -0.272 0.912
Table 5B. Cross-validated classification success (count and %) in predicting group membership (collection site) of individual kelp
rockfish.
Crossvalidated
Site
Classification Results
Predicted Group Membership
3 4 6 7 9 12 14 15 17 18 Total
Count 1. Pt Conception 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 8
2. Plat Holly 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 9
3. Goleta 0 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 10
4. Plat Hogan 0 3 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 10
5. Summerland 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 10
6. Plat Gilda 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 10
7. NE Santa Cruz I 0 1 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 10
8. Plat Edith 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 10
9. Catalina I 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 10
10. Palos Verdes 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 10
% 1. Pt Conception 50.0 .0 .0 .0 25.0 .0 .0 .0 12.5 12.5 100.0
2. Plat Holly .0 55.6 .0 22.2 .0 11.1 .0 11.1 .0 .0 100.0
3. Goleta .0 .0 30.0 10.0 30.0 .0 .0 .0 30.0 .0 100.0
4. Plat Hogan .0 30.0 .0 50.0 10.0 .0 .0 10.0 .0 .0 100.0
5. Summerland .0 .0 20.0 .0 80.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0
6. Plat Gilda .0 10.0 .0 .0 .0 80.0 .0 10.0 .0 .0 100.0
7. NE Santa Cruz I .0 10.0 .0 10.0 .0 .0 80.0 .0 .0 .0 100.0
8. Plat Edith .0 20.0 .0 10.0 .0 30.0 .0 40.0 .0 .0 100.0
9. Catalina I 30.0 .0 10.0 .0 10.0 .0 10.0 .0 10.0 30.0 100.0
10. Palos Verdes 20.0 10.0 30.0 .0 10.0 .0 .0 .0 20.0 10.0 100.0
48.5% of cross-validated grouped cases correctly classified.
48