Reproductive Ecology and Body Burden of Resident ... - The Love Lab
Reproductive Ecology and Body Burden of Resident ... - The Love Lab
Reproductive Ecology and Body Burden of Resident ... - The Love Lab
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 9A. Correlations <strong>of</strong> six predictor variables (Mg Ca -1 , Mn Ca -1 , Fe Ca -1 , Cu Ca -1 , Sr Ca -1 , <strong>and</strong> Ba Ca -1 ; log (x+1) transformed) with<br />
discriminant functions, DF, (canonical loadings) used to classify Pacific s<strong>and</strong>dab to 12 collection sites.<br />
Element Ca -1<br />
Canonical loadings<br />
DF1 DF2 DF3 DF4 DF5 DF6<br />
Ba Ca -1 0.777 0.444 -0.332 -0.022 0.286 0.087<br />
MnCa -1 0.383 -0.837 0.091 0.230 0.042 0.300<br />
Mg Ca -1 0.132 0.261 0.638 0.133 -0.559 0.421<br />
Cu Ca -1 -0.015 0.062 0.389 0.815 0.072 -0.419<br />
Fe Ca -1 0.100 0.220 0.564 -0.119 0.774 -0.102<br />
Sr Ca -1 -0.157 0.423 -0.414 0.363 0.413 0.568<br />
Table 9B. Cross-validated classification success (count <strong>and</strong> %) in predicting group membership (collection sites) <strong>of</strong> individual Pacific<br />
s<strong>and</strong>dab.<br />
Crossvalidated<br />
Classification Results<br />
Predicted Group Membership<br />
Site<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Total<br />
Count 1. Plat Hidalgo 6 0 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10<br />
2. Pt Conception 1 1 0 2 0 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 8<br />
3. Plat Holly 2 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10<br />
4. Goleta 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 8<br />
5. Plat Hogan 2 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8<br />
6. Summerl<strong>and</strong> 0 1 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 9<br />
7. Plat Gina 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 1 1 0 9<br />
8. Hueneme 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 3 0 1 0 0 9<br />
9. Plat Gilda 0 1 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 10<br />
10. NE Santa Cruz I 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 2 1 1 9<br />
11. Plat Edith 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 3 9<br />
12. Long Beach 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 6 9<br />
% 1. Plat Hidalgo 60.0 .0 .0 10.0 30.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0<br />
2. Pt Conception 12.5 12.5 .0 25.0 .0 12.5 .0 12.5 25.0 .0 .0 .0 100.0<br />
3. Plat Holly 20.0 20.0 30.0 10.0 10.0 .0 .0 .0 10.0 .0 .0 .0 100.0<br />
4. Goleta .0 50.0 25.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 12.5 12.5 .0 .0 .0 100.0<br />
5. Plat Hogan 25.0 .0 12.5 .0 62.5 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0<br />
6. Summerl<strong>and</strong> .0 11.1 .0 11.1 11.1 66.7 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0<br />
7. Plat Gina .0 .0 11.1 .0 .0 .0 .0 11.1 55.6 11.1 11.1 .0 100.0<br />
8. Hueneme 11.1 .0 .0 .0 .0 11.1 33.3 33.3 .0 11.1 .0 .0 100.0<br />
9. Plat Gilda .0 10.0 10.0 10.0 20.0 .0 20.0 .0 .0 .0 20.0 10.0 100.0<br />
10. NE Santa Cruz I .0 .0 11.1 11.1 .0 .0 11.1 .0 22.2 22.2 11.1 11.1 100.0<br />
11. Plat Edith .0 .0 .0 11.1 .0 11.1 11.1 .0 .0 11.1 22.2 33.3 100.0<br />
12. Long Beach .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 22.2 .0 .0 11.1 66.7 100.0<br />
31.5% <strong>of</strong> cross-validated grouped cases correctly classified.<br />
55
Change language