Reproductive Ecology and Body Burden of Resident ... - The Love Lab

More documents

Recommendations

Info

CDA generated a model discriminating site groupings of otoliths based on the concentrations of the three elements (Wilk’s Lambda=0.118, X 2 =191.08, df=27, p
Table 5A. Correlations of predictor variables (Sr Ca -1 , Ba Ca -1 , and Mg Ca -1 in otoliths; log (x+1) transformed), with discriminant functions, DF (canonical loadings) used to classify kelp rockfish to ten collection sites. Element Ca -1 Canonical loadings DF1 DF2 DF3 Ba Ca -1 -0.445 0.895 0.040 Sr Ca -1 0.592 0.800 0.099 Mg Ca -1 -0.309 -0.272 0.912 Table 5B. Cross-validated classification success (count and %) in predicting group membership (collection site) of individual kelp rockfish. Crossvalidated Site Classification Results Predicted Group Membership 3 4 6 7 9 12 14 15 17 18 Total Count 1. Pt Conception 4 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 8 2. Plat Holly 0 5 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 9 3. Goleta 0 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 3 0 10 4. Plat Hogan 0 3 0 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 10 5. Summerland 0 0 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 10 6. Plat Gilda 0 1 0 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 10 7. NE Santa Cruz I 0 1 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 10 8. Plat Edith 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 4 0 0 10 9. Catalina I 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 10 10. Palos Verdes 2 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 10 % 1. Pt Conception 50.0 .0 .0 .0 25.0 .0 .0 .0 12.5 12.5 100.0 2. Plat Holly .0 55.6 .0 22.2 .0 11.1 .0 11.1 .0 .0 100.0 3. Goleta .0 .0 30.0 10.0 30.0 .0 .0 .0 30.0 .0 100.0 4. Plat Hogan .0 30.0 .0 50.0 10.0 .0 .0 10.0 .0 .0 100.0 5. Summerland .0 .0 20.0 .0 80.0 .0 .0 .0 .0 .0 100.0 6. Plat Gilda .0 10.0 .0 .0 .0 80.0 .0 10.0 .0 .0 100.0 7. NE Santa Cruz I .0 10.0 .0 10.0 .0 .0 80.0 .0 .0 .0 100.0 8. Plat Edith .0 20.0 .0 10.0 .0 30.0 .0 40.0 .0 .0 100.0 9. Catalina I 30.0 .0 10.0 .0 10.0 .0 10.0 .0 10.0 30.0 100.0 10. Palos Verdes 20.0 10.0 30.0 .0 10.0 .0 .0 .0 20.0 10.0 100.0 48.5% of cross-validated grouped cases correctly classified. 48
Page 1:
Pacific Outer Continental Shelf Reg
Page 4 and 5:
Disclaimer This report had been rev
Page 6 and 7:
TECHNICAL SUMMARY Study Title: Repr
Page 8 and 9:
interactions between total length (
Page 10 and 11:
REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY AND BODY BURDE
Page 12 and 13: tometry. The determination of selen
Page 14 and 15: Task 3: A Histological Examination
Page 16 and 17: Task 1: Whole-body Concentrations o
Page 18 and 19: Study Area and Methods The study ar
Page 20 and 21: Sample Collection Fish species cons
Page 22 and 23: to confirm the calibration status o
Page 24 and 25: variation in elemental concentratio
Page 26 and 27: Table 2. Summary of fish vital stat
Page 28 and 29: Table 3. Variation in total length,
Page 30 and 31: Cadmium. Cadmium concentrations in
Page 32 and 33: Iron. Iron concentrations in the th
Page 34 and 35: Nickel. None of the three fish spec
Page 36 and 37: Strontium. None of the three fish s
Page 38 and 39: Vanadium. Kelp bass and kelp rockfi
Page 40 and 41: came from an oil platform (PL4, 3 o
Page 42 and 43: Table 4. Comparisons of selected tr
Page 44 and 45: Literature Cited Allen, M.J., D.W.
Page 46 and 47: May, T.W., J.F. Fairchild, J.D. Pet
Page 48 and 49: Task 2: Otolith Elemental Signature
Page 50 and 51: sider the ecology of species of int
Page 52 and 53: Table 1. Characteristics of the 18
Page 54 and 55: an undetectable amount of an isotop
Page 56 and 57: Table 2. Two-way ANOVA comparing tr
Page 58 and 59: G 5.0 Kelp rockfish H 20 Platform N
Page 60 and 61: Table 4A. Correlations of predictor
Page 64 and 65: Pacific sanddab otolith elemental s
Page 66 and 67: A 0.034 Pacific Sanddab B 0.10 Plat
Page 68 and 69: Table 7. One-way ANOVA comparing tr
Page 70 and 71: Table 9A. Correlations of six predi
Page 72 and 73: Kelp rockfish Otolith (element/Ca (
Page 74 and 75: Discussion Results from univariate
Page 76 and 77: of non-drilling associated discharg
Page 78 and 79: ture and salinity on otolith elemen
Page 80 and 81: Miller, J. A and A. L. Shanks. 2004
Page 82 and 83: Appendix 2. Seawater element-to-cal
Page 84 and 85: Appendix 3. Seawater element-to-cal
Page 86 and 87: Task 3: A Histological Examination
Page 88 and 89: Table 1. Details of Pacific sanddab
Page 90 and 91: Figure 2. A) Ovary of Pacific sandd
Page 92 and 93: Literature Cited Allen, M. J. 1982.
show all

Reproductive Ecology and Body Burden of Resident ... - The Love Lab

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?