16.11.2012 Views

TREASURE ANNU AL REPORT 2005/6 - Portable Antiquities Scheme

TREASURE ANNU AL REPORT 2005/6 - Portable Antiquities Scheme

TREASURE ANNU AL REPORT 2005/6 - Portable Antiquities Scheme

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to overlap the remaining side-plate. The face-plates are<br />

decorated with fine, close-set concentric ridges. Part of a<br />

core is visible. External diameter: 31.5mm; weight: 1.22g.<br />

5. Lock-ring fragment, about half, crushed and torn. The<br />

junction of the top and bottom edges of the tube and<br />

face-plates is too damaged to be able to discern the<br />

method of securing it, but the surviving side-plate does<br />

appear to be integral with the tube. The face-plates are<br />

decorated in the same way as no. 4. There is a visible<br />

core. External diameter: 30.03mm; weight: 1.35g.<br />

6. Lock-ring fragment, about half, crushed and with<br />

tube and side-plate absent; however enough detail<br />

remains to suggest that the ends of the face-plates<br />

had overlapped the side plates; the face-plates overlap<br />

slightly to join at the outer rim. The face-plates are<br />

decorated in the same way as nos. 4 and 5 and there is<br />

a visible core. External diameter: 30.12mm;<br />

weight: 1.18g.<br />

bronze:<br />

7. Penannular bracelet, in four joining fragments.<br />

Hoop of slightly oval section, expanding suddenly and<br />

asymmetrically outwards at the terminals. Their ends<br />

are very gently convex. Reconstructed diameter: 76.5 x<br />

74.5mm; max. diameter of terminals: 9.2mm;<br />

weight: 35.0g.<br />

8. Penannular bracelet, in three fragments; two join<br />

but there is a missing portion before the second<br />

terminal. Hoop of oval section, expanding suddenly<br />

and asymmetrically outwards at the terminals.<br />

Reconstructed diameter c. 64mm; diameter of<br />

terminals: 5.2 x 6.0, 5.2 x 5.7mm; weight: 10.2g.<br />

9. Bracelet or large ring fragments, two fragments with<br />

a possible weathered join. Hoop of slightly oval section,<br />

the terminals lacking. Reconstructed diameter: 71mm;<br />

weight: 17.3g.<br />

10. Coiled rod bracelet, four fragments – two pairs<br />

having probable abraded joins between, but no join<br />

survives at the middle break. Thin rod of ‘D’ section, a<br />

narrow flattened face opposite a well rounded one.<br />

The terminals taper steadily to acute wedge-like ends.<br />

If no significant loss at non-joining break, the terminals<br />

overlap by about a quarter circuit. Reconstructed<br />

external diameter: 70mm; thickness of the terminals<br />

0.6mm; weight: 9.9g.<br />

11. Large annular ring, complete. Hoop of slightly oval<br />

section. Dimensions vary a little round the circuit,<br />

potentially due to differential wear. Diameter: 8.9–<br />

9.2mm; weight: 13.8g.<br />

12. Large annular ring, complete, but broken in two.<br />

Hoop of slightly oval section. Dimensions vary a little<br />

round the circuit, potentially due to differential wear.<br />

Diameter: 8.9–9.6mm; weight: 11.8g.<br />

13. Large annular ring, two fragments possibly with<br />

abraded join. The remaining ends are weathered and<br />

around one-eighth of the circuit is missing. Diameter:<br />

8.6mm; weight: 5.4g.<br />

14. Large annular ring fragment, just under half extant.<br />

Hoop of slightly oval section. Maximum dimension:<br />

48.5mm; weight: 7.6g.<br />

15. Large annular ring fragment, approximately onethird<br />

extant. Hoop of sub-pentagonal section, with<br />

four flattish facets around the sides and inner face, but<br />

a broad and convex outer face. Maximum dimension:<br />

50mm; weight: 3.8g.<br />

16. Large annular ring fragment, approximately onesixth<br />

extant, with hints of faceted section similar to no<br />

14. Maximum dimension: 34mm; weight: 1.5g.<br />

17. Pin fragment, nail-headed? The tip is lacking and<br />

the head severely reduced by corrosion leaving a strong<br />

projection on just one side, but presumed originally<br />

to have been a symmetrical disc head. The shank is<br />

sub-square in section. Length: 81mm; maximum width<br />

head: 7.0mm; weight: 4.1g.<br />

18. Pin shank, in two fragments, probably joining. Head<br />

lacking. Round section shank tapering steadily towards<br />

now-lost tip. Diagonal grinding marks all round. Length:<br />

69.3mm; weight: 3.3g.<br />

19. Pin shank fragment, from mid-shank. Round<br />

section, highly polished surface. Length: 27.7mm;<br />

weight: 0.9g.<br />

20. Bugle-shaped fitting. Ring-and-loop part of twopart<br />

fitting; complete but with some cracking. Sub-<br />

D-shaped ring hollow-cast with thick round to oval<br />

section. A staple-like loop with a rough sub-triangular<br />

section is appended to the flatter side. Underneath it<br />

is a long cast perforation in the ring wall, allowing the<br />

original clay core to be seen. A second, oval perforation<br />

pierces the inner wall of the ring diametrically opposite.<br />

Length: 55.5mm; width: 61.0mm; weight: 73.4g.<br />

21. Curved plate-like fragment, possible bugle-shaped<br />

fitting. Crescent-shaped piece with ragged fractures all<br />

round. Also curved in section, thus from hollow-backed<br />

or tubular object. Curvatures very similar to those on<br />

no. 20. Maximum dimension: 32mm; weight: 2.5g.<br />

22. Socketed axe, a variant of the South-eastern type.<br />

Wooden haft remains in the socket. Blade slightly<br />

expanded, very shallow blade tip hollows. Well-defined<br />

casting flashes, removal attempts on the lower blade.<br />

Length: 95.6mm; width of blade: 42.7mm;<br />

weight: 206.6g.<br />

23. Socketed axe, features in common with both<br />

Type Meldreth and Type Portree; relatively slender,<br />

unfacetted body. Square socket, flat top and unusual<br />

inverted step as second moulding. Very expanded blade<br />

edge as cast. Prominent and untrimmed casting flashes.<br />

Length: 85.5mm; width of blade: 50.4mm;<br />

weight: 127.0g.<br />

24. Socketed axe, Type Portree, Variant Kalemouth.<br />

Rounded mouth with flat top. Short internal ribs in the<br />

bottom of the socket. Expanded blade, with projecting<br />

tips as cast. Length: 70.7mm; width of blade: 48.1mm;<br />

concreted weight of 24, 25, 28 & 29 together: 470.7g.<br />

25. Socketed axe, Type Gilespie, Variant Culloden.<br />

Trumpet mouth moulding. Untrimmed casting flashes.<br />

There is a hollow, possibly from a gas bubble mid-way<br />

down this side, and during casting, the two parts of the<br />

mould were misaligned creating a ledge on one side.<br />

Concreted to no. 24 by corrosion products, nos. 28 &<br />

29 wedged in socket. Length: 81.5mm;<br />

width of blade: 59.9mm.<br />

26. Socketed axe, Yorkshire type. Incomplete. Three<br />

widely spaced ribs. Biconical moulding below collar.<br />

A large area is missing from the mouth and upper<br />

blade from one side and face. At this point on the<br />

side, the metal is extremely thin and there is a casting<br />

fault in the form of an oval perforation, only part of<br />

which survives. There is also an elongated narrow oval<br />

perforation on one face. Fine horizontal striations at<br />

the blade edge. Off-centre casting flashes and the<br />

ghost of casting flashes from a model that were not<br />

removed before moulding. Considerable copper-alloy<br />

corrosion products within the socket and on the<br />

faces, incorporating a body fragment which is almost<br />

certainly part of the chape (no. 35). Length: 85.2mm;<br />

width of blade: 56.4mm; weight: 204.1g.<br />

27. Socketed axe, possibly Type Everthorpe. Incomplete,<br />

lacking upper body and most of the loop. Expanded<br />

blade, developed blade tip hollows on both sides. The<br />

loop stump is low. Crisp, rectangular-sectioned body.<br />

Length: 75.5mm; width of blade: 52.9mm;<br />

weight: 107.1g.<br />

28. Socketed gouge. Circular socket, deep flat collar,<br />

underlined by a neat groove. Wedged inside axe no 25.<br />

Diameter of socket: 17mm.<br />

29. Socketed gouge. Gouge facet not visible, but almost<br />

certainly a gouge. Casting flashes not removed at the<br />

mouth. Wedged inside axe no. 25.<br />

Diameter of socket: 17.2mm.<br />

30. Socketed gouge. Circular socket. The casting sprues<br />

are removed unevenly. Length: 72.4mm; Diameter of<br />

socket: 19.5mm; weight: 55.9g.<br />

31. Knife (or rapier) blade fragment. Flat midrib with<br />

slightly hollowed edge bevels. Length: 95.3mm;<br />

weight: 19.5g.<br />

32. Bifid razor blade portion. Broad, heel-shaped blade<br />

and stump of the tang. There is both a notch and a<br />

central circular perforation in the blade. Both faces have<br />

two ribs, skirting to either side of the perforation. Edge<br />

bevel visible on one blade wing on one face only. Fine<br />

striations along the blade on both sides of each face.<br />

Length: 59.9mm; weight: 17.1g.<br />

33. Razor blade fragment. Fragment from the blade<br />

midrib. Two parallel central ribs on each face. The<br />

perforation may be present but is uncertain due to<br />

fractured edges. The shape of the blade is unknown due<br />

to extensive edge loss. Length: 46.5mm; weight: 4.8g.<br />

34. Spearhead blade fragment. Leaf-shaped blade,<br />

tapering midrib and eye-shaped socket section. Hollow<br />

edge bevels 5.5mm from blade edge. Length: 87.2mm;<br />

weight: 40.2g.<br />

35. Tongue chape fragment. Three joining lower body<br />

fragments including the ‘button’ terminal. The body<br />

is of rhombic section, but with narrow flattened sides<br />

throughout its length. The applied oval button-stud<br />

is intact. The body fragment attached by corrosion<br />

products to axe no. 26 is almost certainly part of this<br />

chape. Length: 63.5mm; weight: 16.2g.<br />

36. Ingot, pear-shaped. An asymmetric pear shape in<br />

plan, one end rounded, the other more pointed, planoconvex<br />

in section. Length: 157mm; maximum thickness:<br />

19mm; weight: 758.1g.<br />

37. Pottery sherds. Twenty sherds (excluding several<br />

small chips) are all of a similar fabric, coloration and<br />

thickness and seem likely to belong to a single vessel.<br />

Most have weathered or worn edges and only two joins<br />

were found. One other has an eroded rounded edge<br />

which may represent a simple rim. Weight: 325.6g.<br />

38. ?Refractory sherd: One sherd is of a different, finer<br />

fabric, seemingly mid grey throughout, and highly<br />

eroded. The fabric is suggestive of clay mould or<br />

crucible. Weight: 17.4g.<br />

Note: Surface analysis indicated gold content for<br />

the six lock-rings of approximately 79–83% and<br />

established that the cores of the gold objects, where<br />

present, were made of beeswax. The haft fragment in<br />

axe no. 22 is of hazel wood (identification:<br />

C Cartwright).<br />

Discussion: Despite the rarity of hoards in the<br />

region and the unusual dominance of ornaments, the<br />

components of the Berwick hoard are all familiar from<br />

the Ewart phase of the Late Bronze Age countrywide,<br />

reinforced by a new radiocarbon measurement on the<br />

haft remnant in Berwick axe 22. The result is 2771 ± 26<br />

BP, calibrating to 1000–840 BC (2-sigma; OxA- 15102),<br />

and suggests that the Berwick hoard was deposited<br />

before the close of the phase. This assumes some<br />

importance in relation to the assumption that most of<br />

the numerous Ewart stage hoards were deposited very<br />

late on, as bronze became redundant.<br />

Ingot no. 36 is of special interest because it is of alloyed<br />

bronze rather than copper. This may help explain why<br />

the ingot is of an unfamiliar shape, deriving from a<br />

different stage of the production/recycling sequence.<br />

The pear shape is likely to be a by-product of the<br />

crucible in which the metal was last melted down. A<br />

(near) complete pear-shaped crucible is known from a<br />

Bronze Age context at The Breiddin, Powys.<br />

The six socketed axes represent an interesting variety<br />

of types all different from one another. No. 23 is<br />

particularly interesting in that it does not belong to an<br />

as yet defined type; it combines features of both Type<br />

Meldreth and Type Portree, but also has an unusual<br />

inverted step moulding or upwards facing ledge,<br />

parallels for which are very few. Axes 24–27 are types<br />

that occur widely in the North of England and Scotland,<br />

but axe 22 is closest in form to the South-eastern type<br />

which becomes very rare north of Yorkshire (Schmidt<br />

& Burgess 1981, 217). It is perhaps worthy of note that<br />

where secondary mouth mouldings exist on these axes,<br />

they are consistently poorly defined.<br />

Both razors are bifid Class II examples (Piggott<br />

1946, 138–40). The tang and perforation on no. 32<br />

are positioned similarly to those of Type Dowris<br />

(Jockenhövel 1980, Taf. 11 nos. 190–96), although the<br />

four central ribs on the Berwick example appear to<br />

mark a new variant.<br />

42 BRONZE AGE BRONZE AGE 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!