TREASURE ANNU AL REPORT 2005/6 - Portable Antiquities Scheme
TREASURE ANNU AL REPORT 2005/6 - Portable Antiquities Scheme
TREASURE ANNU AL REPORT 2005/6 - Portable Antiquities Scheme
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
307. Corby area, Northamptonshire:<br />
Early medieval gold fragment (2006 T43)<br />
Date: Late 8th–second half of the 10th century<br />
Discovery: Found by Mr R Shaw while metal-detecting<br />
in October <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Description: A round possible attachment loop from<br />
a larger object, embedded in and forming one end of<br />
a rectangular frame, which expands and flattens out<br />
at the other end, where it is broken off. The remainder<br />
of the original object might, for instance, have been<br />
round or cross-shaped. The fragment was assembled<br />
from several parts, at least the loop, a backing sheet<br />
for the rectangular section, another sheet merged<br />
with it and the filigree decoration. The rectangular<br />
part of the object is very ornate and decorated threedimensionally<br />
with filigree, now partly squashed. The<br />
expanded, flat end is plain and looks like it was only a<br />
backing, perhaps for a set gem. Height: 15mm; max.<br />
depth: 4mm; weight: 1.17g. Surface analysis indicated<br />
gold and silver contents of 78–80% and 16–18%<br />
respectively.<br />
Discussion: The circular loop contains two parallel<br />
grooves and, unusually, is set with its opening aligned<br />
to the main axis of the object, making any use as<br />
a suspension loop awkward and speaking against<br />
such an interpretation. It seems possible that this<br />
fragment rather formed the lower end of an object and<br />
something else was suspended from it. Viking filigree<br />
earrings (Graham-Campbell 1980, cat. no. 334 and p.<br />
270 no. 334) or trefoil brooches (Eilbracht 1999, cat. no.<br />
298 and Tafel 27) from Scandinavia sometimes show<br />
such or similar arrangements. There are, however, no<br />
traces of wear to support such a suggestion. As the loop<br />
is separately formed and resembles attachment loops<br />
of 7th-century pendants and bracteates, it may have<br />
been reused. The object is difficult to date and its use<br />
is unclear. Filigree and granulation such as this seem to<br />
be typical of the later phases of the early middle ages.<br />
See for example, a small gold plate with twisted wire<br />
and gold granule decoration from Winchester, from a<br />
10th-century context (Backhouse et al. cat. no. 78),<br />
or a similarly decorated piece from Sutton-on-Forest,<br />
North Yorkshire, which can be dated to the second half<br />
of the 9th century (Treasure Annual Report 2000, no.<br />
82). Filigree was also popular in the Viking age, both in<br />
Scandinavia and in the British Isles (cf. above, Wilson<br />
1964, Plate XIX.28 and Eilbracht 1999).<br />
Disposition: Manor House Museum, Kettering hopes<br />
to acquire.<br />
S MARZINZIK<br />
308. Kelvedon, Essex:<br />
Early medieval Runic gold fragment (<strong>2005</strong> T298)<br />
Date: Probably 9th century<br />
Discovery: Found by Ms C Mills while metal detecting<br />
in August <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Description: An oblong, solid fragment of a larger<br />
object, roughly D-shaped in cross section and tapering<br />
in height towards one end. At the higher end, the<br />
fragment appears to have been chopped. The shorter<br />
end shows some damage and it seems that part of the<br />
underside has been cut away here. The upper, curved,<br />
side is divided into two panels by a band running along<br />
the middle axis. The fragment is engraved on both<br />
sides with runes of the Anglo-Saxon runic alphabet, or<br />
futhorc. Only three letters survive on each face: these<br />
may be transliterated respectively as (dots indicate<br />
where further letters are missing):<br />
(a) …G D E<br />
(b) T Æ A…<br />
The runes are set in relief on a recessed background,<br />
which may originally have contained niello. Max. length:<br />
9mm; max. height: 5mm; weight: 3.1g. Surface analysis<br />
indicated a gold content of approximately 91–93%; the<br />
small white specks on the back are osmium/iridium/<br />
ruthenium containing inclusions, indicating that the<br />
gold came from alluvial sources.<br />
An alluvial source for gold has been identified in at<br />
least one other 9th-century Anglo-Saxon object.<br />
Discussion: It is not clear what object this very small<br />
and damaged fragment came from. Although the<br />
shape is superficially reminiscent of a 7th-century<br />
sword pommel, cut in half, such pommel fittings are<br />
hollow, not solid like this, and the fragment is also very<br />
small, and stylistically later in date. It is not possible<br />
to make much sense from such truncated inscriptions,<br />
but two tentative interpretations may be offered. (a),<br />
which is probably the end of a word, from its form is<br />
likely to be the end of a verb in the third person, past<br />
tense. This could have thus been part of a formula, ‘X<br />
verb Y’, as in ‘X made’ or ‘owned Y’. (b) is probably the<br />
beginning of a word; D Parsons, Institute for Name<br />
Studies, Nottingham University, has suggested that it<br />
might be a form of the Old English ‘teah’, meaning ‘tie’,<br />
‘fastening’ or, secondarily, ‘box’, ‘case’, ‘casket’, ‘coffer’.<br />
It is possible (but cannot be proved) that this word<br />
might be the Y element, or part of it, in the formula<br />
suggested by the (unknown) verb on the other side. If<br />
the full inscription did follow such a formula, then it<br />
follows that an X element must have preceded the verb<br />
represented by its last three letters on side (a).<br />
This would have implications for the original scale of<br />
the object.<br />
The small letters, cut in relief against a background<br />
possibly originally inlaid with niello, are typical of<br />
9th-century Anglo-Saxon inscriptions, such as the<br />
Æthelwulf and ‘Lancashire’ rings, and the piece is likely<br />
to date to that period. The fact that the fragment has<br />
been both struck and chopped up, perhaps for use as<br />
bullion, might suggest that this took place in a context<br />
of Viking activity in the later 9th or 10th century;<br />
Kelvedon is on the edge of an area of Scandinavian<br />
settlement focused on Colchester.<br />
Disposition: Braintree District Museum.<br />
L WEBSTER & S MARZINZIK<br />
309. hotham, East Riding of yorkshire:<br />
Viking-age silver cut piece (<strong>2005</strong> T256)<br />
Date: 9th–11th century<br />
Discovery: Found by Mr R Whitaker while metaldetecting<br />
in April <strong>2005</strong>.<br />
Description: One side of the piece displays an<br />
engraved linear decoration: a double line segment,<br />
a leaf-motif, a patterning of minute dots (shading)<br />
above it, and a few other single lines remaining. The<br />
decoration, albeit tentatively, might suggest parallels<br />
with the Sutton disc brooch, an Anglo-Scandinavian<br />
find of the 11th century (Backhouse et al 1984, no.<br />
105), where there are lentoid fields of similar double<br />
contour. The heart-shaped leaf is typical of Carolingian<br />
ornamentation of the time. It appears that the piece<br />
was cut from a larger flat object, perhaps a brooch or<br />
a mount, in a way that suggests that it was cut with<br />
the decorated face downwards, with regard only to<br />
the intrinsic value of the metal, as hack-silver. Length:<br />
25mm; thickness: c. 1.5mm; weight: 6g.<br />
Disposition: East Riding Museum Service.<br />
A GANNON<br />
310. penrith area, Cumbria:<br />
Viking silver jewellery and coin hoard (<strong>2005</strong> T471)<br />
Date: c. AD 925<br />
Discovery: Found by North Pennines Archaeology Ltd<br />
during a controlled archaeological detecting survey in<br />
October <strong>2005</strong>, near to the site of a separate, coinless<br />
hoard of seven Viking-period brooches, acquired by the<br />
British Museum in 1991.<br />
Description: The hoard comprises both items of Viking<br />
jewellery and coins.<br />
Coins: The hoard contained an indeterminate number<br />
of silver coins, most of which are broken, and many of<br />
them are fragmentary and either blank or undiagnostic;<br />
work on these is ongoing, and all attributions below are<br />
subject to further study. The coins in summary are<br />
as follows:<br />
Edward the Elder (Horizontal), 29<br />
Edward the Elder (Portrait), 4<br />
Edward the Elder (Flower), 2<br />
Edward the Elder (Uncertain), 10<br />
Archbishop Plegmund, 6<br />
St Edmund Memorial (late), 1<br />
St Peter (Swordless), 2<br />
St Peter (Sword), 6<br />
Sihtric (Sword), 3<br />
Islamic fragments, 12<br />
Uncertain fragments, 60 (from up to 44 different coins)<br />
This gives a total of up to 120 coins, with a combined<br />
weight of 59.9g. The fragmentary condition of the<br />
coinage largely appears to be the result of damage in<br />
the ground, although it is likely that all of the Islamic<br />
pieces were deposited in the form of cut fragments.<br />
silver objects:<br />
1. Flattened, cigar-shaped ingot, a deeply nicked<br />
testing-mark on one side; length: 84mm; weight: 64.2g.<br />
2. Section of a large, thick ingot cut from side to side,<br />
of rounded, sub-triangular section; length: 23mm;<br />
weight: 23.3g.<br />
3. Short section of an ingot cut from side to side,<br />
plano-convex; length: 12mm; weight: 3.4g.<br />
4. Short section of an ingot cut half way across and<br />
from side to side, rounded, sub-rectangular crosssection;<br />
length: 9mm; weight: 2.6g.<br />
5. Short section of an ingot cut from side to side,<br />
plano-convex; length: 13mm; weight: 5.3g.<br />
6. One end cut off a cigar-shaped ingot, rounded,<br />
sub-triangular section; length: 10mm; weight: 2.7g.<br />
7. One end of a cigar-shaped ingot, cut off with a<br />
chisel, sub-triangular section; length: 18mm;<br />
weight: 9.0g.<br />
8. Fragment of cigar-shaped ingot, cut off at both ends,<br />
ovoid section; length: 27mm; weight: 15.9g.<br />
9. One end of a flattened, cigar-shaped ingot, cut off<br />
with a chisel, nicked testing-marks along the sides;<br />
length: 30mm; weight: 20.9g.<br />
10. Sub-rectangular fragment cut from an ingot of<br />
flattened, ovoid section; length: 9mm; weight: 1.7g.<br />
11. One end cut from the hoop of a large ‘thistle<br />
brooch’, with the terminal missing. It forms a thick rod,<br />
half circular and half slightly narrower rectangular in<br />
section, with a slight flange round the point where they<br />
meet. The rectangular section is pierced towards each<br />
end by two holes and there is a nicked testing-mark on<br />
one side of the round section; length: 43mm; weight:<br />
24.8g; see for comparison an example from Newbiggin<br />
Moor, Cumbria (Graham-Campbell 1980, no. 195).<br />
12. Length of thick, cut curved rod, from the hoop of<br />
a brooch (possibly the same one as no. 11); length:<br />
73mm; weight: 37.4g.<br />
13. Terminal of a neck-ring in the form of a slightly<br />
curved bar, of square section at the narrow end where<br />
the hook has been cut off, and expanding to secure the<br />
inserted ends of six thin rods, which would have been<br />
plaited to form a cable hoop; length: 50mm (surviving);<br />
also four small fragments of twisted rods; weight: 12.5g<br />
(cf. examples from the Cuerdale Hoard, Lancashire<br />
(Hawkins 1847, figs. 58–60).<br />
14. Hook-ended terminal of thin rod from a neck-ring<br />
(see no. 13 for discussion); length: 13mm; weight: 0.6g.<br />
15. Short length of plaited cable of thin rods from hoop<br />
of a neck-ring of six strands; length: 40mm;<br />
weight: 8.3g.<br />
16. Short length of cable hoop from a neck-ring of five<br />
thin, plaited rods; length: 49mm; weight: 11.3g.<br />
100 EARLY MEDIEV<strong>AL</strong> EARLY MEDIEV<strong>AL</strong> 101