DEVELOPMENT OF SAVA RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT ... - ICPDR

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2. Execution of Tasks page 18 to be based on similar work done in other river basins (e.g. Rhine, Meuse, Tisza), and make use of documents developed at the ICPDR level (incl. GEF-Danube Pollution Reduction Programme - Transboundary Analysis 1999). Based on international experience on developing key transboundary issues, the International Consultants were to ask (via a template) the Local Consultants to discuss and develop an initial list of key transboundary issues with the national government experts. The results were to be assessed and merged by the International Consultants for discussion and agreement at a regional workshop, in Sarajevo (as day 1 of a 2.5 days workshop addressing also Task 3). This process was to make use of the Danube key issues (see the related new RBM EG issue paper) at the Sava level. The regional workshop was to conclude preliminary key transboundary issues for the Sava basin and was linked to the workshop under Activity 3.5. Output: A short report on agreed list of preliminary key transboundary issues for the Sava basin. 2.1.3.3. Task 3: Support to the Development of Topics for a Programme of Measures Objective: Initiate and support the agreement on the topics (strategic priorities) of the future Programme of Measures. Execution: Taking into account the early stage of WFD implementation in 2006 (compared to the need to prepare an RBMP by 2009), it was agreed with ICPDR and the Beneficiaries that in this GEF Component focus should be on the topics of such Measures that are expected to best contribute to achieve the WFD objectives in the Sava basin in the future. Therefore, the focus of this Task was to be on a regional discussion and agreement on the types of such Measures that are best suitable for addressing the key transboundary issues of the Sava region. Again, the development of this Activity was to be based on international experience, i.e. the International Consultants were to ask (via a template) the Local Consultants to discuss and develop an initial list of types of Measures with the national government experts. The results were to be assessed and merged by the International Consultants for making concrete proposals for criteria and contents of the PoM (discussing sub-basin WFD objectives), which then were to be discussed and finalised at a regional workshop in Sarajevo. The execution of Task 3 was linked to that of Task 2 (Activity 2.6) to make best use of the available time and funds of all experts to be involved (day 2 of a 2.5 days workshop). Output: A short report on agreed list of preliminary priority types of Measures for the Sava basin. General recommendations on how to develop Sava basin objectives based on Danube basin experience. 2.1.3.4. Task 4: Structure of the Sava River Basin Management Plan Objective: Initiate and support the agreement on the structure of the future Sava RBM Plan. Execution: Taking into account the early stage of WFD implementation in 2006 (compared to the need to prepare an RBMP by 2009), it was agreed with ICPDR and the Beneficiaries that in this GEF Component a structure for the Sava RBM Plan should be produced. This was to be based on the EU (CIS) and ICPDR (Road Map) guidances but also to reflect the current Sava results and consultations, i.e. what character/content and quality of such a Plan can be expected by 2009.
Sava River Basin Management Plan – Final Report UNDP/GEF DANUBE REGIONAL PROJECT page 19 The International Consultant were to also prepare a draft “Road Map” for the Sava RBM Plan, tuned with the new Danube RBMP Road Map. Even though this was not foreseen in the ToR, it was found useful by the Beneficiaries and the Sava Commission to have such a document available for further discussions. The draft Sava RBMP structure as well as the proposed Road Map were to be presented and discussed at a final, 2-days regional workshop (tentatively in Belgrade, eventually held in Zagreb). This meeting should also serve to summarise and conclude the overall results of the UNDP/GEF DRP Component. As regards the aspect of public participation, it was agreed that, different to the ToR, the general PP strategy for the Sava basin prepared by the REC (Regional Environmental Center) should be reviewed, taking into account the strategy already developed for the Danube basin. The findings of the review on the Sava PP strategy were to be presented at the final workshop. Output: A short report on agreed RBMP structure and related Road Map as well as the findings of the reviewed PP strategy for the Sava basin. 2.1.3.5. Timing and outputs of tasks and activities The timing and relations of all Tasks and activities is summarised in Figure 2 below. The project activities were undertaken in close cooperation with the relevant ICPDR expert groups (in particular RBM EG), the Sava Commission Secretariat, the Sava CARDS project and national authorities coordinating the implementation of the WFD. The main steering body supervising the execution of this assignment was the Sava Working Group. It included representatives from the following bodies: > The Beneficiary countries (HR, BA, CS and SI) > The Sava Commission Secretariat > The ICPDR > The UNDP/GEF-DRP Meetings of the Sava Working Group were organised to coincide with the planned regional Component workshops in February (Inception Workshop) and October 2006 (Task 2&3 Workshop) and in January 2007. (Task 4 Workshop)
Page 1 and 2: March 2007 DEVELOPMENT OF SAVA RIVE
Page 3: PREFACE The UNDP/GEF Danube Regiona
Page 6 and 7: page 6 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Numb
Page 9 and 10: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Sava River Basin
Page 11 and 12: Sava River Basin Management Plan -
Page 13 and 14: 2. EXECUTION OF TASKS Sava River Ba
Page 17: Sava River Basin Management Plan -
Page 21 and 22: 2.2. General results Sava River Bas
Page 29 and 30: Table 2 Suitability of Types of Mea
Page 31 and 32: 2.5. Results of Task 4 Sava River B
Page 33: 3. CONCLUSIONS Sava River Basin Man
Page 37 and 38: APPENDIX 1 DEVELOPMENT OF SAVA RIVE
Page 39 and 40: Presentations: A. Scheidleder: •
Page 41 and 42: ANNEX 1: Report on WFD Gap Analysis
Page 43 and 44: PART I WFD templates - Meta data an
Page 45 and 46: groundwater bodies will be finished
Page 47 and 48: 5 Annex I : Summary of SAVA WFD Tem
Page 49 and 50: Template Contact Contact 9-Reservoi
Page 51 and 52: Template Contact Contact person Dat
Page 53 and 54: Bosnia and Herzegovina Template Con
Page 55 and 56: Template Contact Contact 5-Refconds
Page 57 and 58: Template Contact Contact 8-WB_River
Page 59 and 60: Template Contact Contact 11- Hydrom
Page 61 and 62: Socio-Economic Analysis at the Sava
Page 63 and 64: different ministries or institution
Page 65 and 66: Main gaps / difficulties Bosnia & H
Page 67 and 68: Anticipating future WFD implementat
Page 69 and 70:
ANNEX 2.1: UNDP/GEF Consultants Mis
Page 71 and 72:
No . CARDS PILOT RIVER BASIN PLAN F
Page 73 and 74:
etter to divide those big groundwat
Page 75 and 76:
internally clarified within the UND
Page 77 and 78:
Annex 2.3 Minutes from the Vienna W
Page 79 and 80:
AGENDA: Tuesday 26 September 2006 I
Page 81:
15:15 - 17:00 Group Pollution Group
Page 84 and 85:
Sava RBMP Pilot Project: Report on
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
B. Key Transboundary Issues (Task 2
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Floods and Droughts Invasive Specie
Page 126 and 127:
C. Topics of Measures (Task 3) Sava
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
• Governance and Organisation Sav
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Exploitation of Fisheries and other
Page 142 and 143:
• Governance and Organisation Tra
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
ANNEX IV SARAJEVO WORKSHOP AGENDA A
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
17 SRB 18 Country/ Institution Sava
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
8 Sava RBMP Pilot Project: Report o
Page 172 and 173:
Reporting Sheet Code 5. Environment
Page 174 and 175:
Reporting Sheet Code 12 Sava RBMP P
Page 176 and 177:
DRAFT - Road Map for Sava River Bas
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Activities DRAFT - Road Map for Sav
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Issues related to SRB MP (WFD) Oper
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Country/ Institution DRAFT - Road M
show all

DEVELOPMENT OF SAVA RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT ... - ICPDR

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?