Military Professionalism - United States Air Force Academy
Military Professionalism - United States Air Force Academy
Military Professionalism - United States Air Force Academy
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
at all levels use concurrent to the implementation of a <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> Army Service Test.<br />
Finally, the Army must continue to engender the Code of Conduct for Fighting <strong>Force</strong>s as<br />
the foundation of the military way of life.<br />
Donnelly, Elaine. “Defending the Culture of the <strong>Military</strong>.” In Attitudes Aren’t Free:<br />
Thinking Deeply about Diversity in the U.S. Armed <strong>Force</strong>s. Ed. James E. Parco<br />
and David A. Levy. Maxwell <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> Base, Alabama: <strong>Air</strong> University Press,<br />
Feb. 2010, 249-292.<br />
http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA518901<br />
When there is a conflict between equal opportunity and military necessity, the needs of<br />
the military must come first. Elevating the individual over the mission is the antithesis of<br />
military service. Policy changes involving political coercion, compromised standards,<br />
and elevated risks of social disruption would undermine the culture of the military and<br />
complicate the lives of thousands of men and women in the military whose voices are<br />
rarely heard. It cannot be assumed that because foreign militaries have allowed<br />
homosexuals to serve without negative consequences that the same will be true for the<br />
U.S. military due to differences in culture. The “don’t ask, don’t tell” statute should be<br />
upheld.<br />
Dumont, Mike. “Debate on Gays Serving Petty in Dangerous Times.” The Officer<br />
84.1 (Jan. 2008): 9-11.<br />
Captain Dumont argues that repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell” is not about sanctioning<br />
homosexual behavior but about fairness and respect for all citizens. The privilege of<br />
serving should be offered to all who are physically, morally, and mentally qualified,<br />
regardless of sexual orientation. Awarding waivers to individuals with drug, theft, and<br />
assault offenses will do more do destroy the military than admitting openly homosexual<br />
individuals.<br />
“Family Research Council; Would Open Homosexuality in the <strong>Military</strong> Expose<br />
Religious Liberties to Greater Attack?” Defense & Aerospace Business (Mar. 10,<br />
2010): 165.<br />
In October, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, a former marine, received<br />
an invitation to speak at a National Prayer Luncheon on February 25 at Andrews <strong>Air</strong><br />
<strong>Force</strong> Base outside Washington, D.C. on the theme “Getting Back to the Basics.” In<br />
January, Perkins and FRC spoke out against President Obama’s plan to repeal “don’t ask,<br />
don’t tell” and urged Congress to retain the current law which excludes homosexuals<br />
from openly serving in the military. Two days later, Perkins received a letter from the<br />
chaplain's office at Andrews AFB rescinding the invitation to speak at the prayer<br />
luncheon, citing FRC statements “which are incompatible in our role as military members<br />
who serve our elected officials and our Commander in Chief.”<br />
51