16.11.2012 Views

Military Professionalism - United States Air Force Academy

Military Professionalism - United States Air Force Academy

Military Professionalism - United States Air Force Academy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

at all levels use concurrent to the implementation of a <strong>United</strong> <strong>States</strong> Army Service Test.<br />

Finally, the Army must continue to engender the Code of Conduct for Fighting <strong>Force</strong>s as<br />

the foundation of the military way of life.<br />

Donnelly, Elaine. “Defending the Culture of the <strong>Military</strong>.” In Attitudes Aren’t Free:<br />

Thinking Deeply about Diversity in the U.S. Armed <strong>Force</strong>s. Ed. James E. Parco<br />

and David A. Levy. Maxwell <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong> Base, Alabama: <strong>Air</strong> University Press,<br />

Feb. 2010, 249-292.<br />

http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA518901<br />

When there is a conflict between equal opportunity and military necessity, the needs of<br />

the military must come first. Elevating the individual over the mission is the antithesis of<br />

military service. Policy changes involving political coercion, compromised standards,<br />

and elevated risks of social disruption would undermine the culture of the military and<br />

complicate the lives of thousands of men and women in the military whose voices are<br />

rarely heard. It cannot be assumed that because foreign militaries have allowed<br />

homosexuals to serve without negative consequences that the same will be true for the<br />

U.S. military due to differences in culture. The “don’t ask, don’t tell” statute should be<br />

upheld.<br />

Dumont, Mike. “Debate on Gays Serving Petty in Dangerous Times.” The Officer<br />

84.1 (Jan. 2008): 9-11.<br />

Captain Dumont argues that repealing “don’t ask, don’t tell” is not about sanctioning<br />

homosexual behavior but about fairness and respect for all citizens. The privilege of<br />

serving should be offered to all who are physically, morally, and mentally qualified,<br />

regardless of sexual orientation. Awarding waivers to individuals with drug, theft, and<br />

assault offenses will do more do destroy the military than admitting openly homosexual<br />

individuals.<br />

“Family Research Council; Would Open Homosexuality in the <strong>Military</strong> Expose<br />

Religious Liberties to Greater Attack?” Defense & Aerospace Business (Mar. 10,<br />

2010): 165.<br />

In October, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, a former marine, received<br />

an invitation to speak at a National Prayer Luncheon on February 25 at Andrews <strong>Air</strong><br />

<strong>Force</strong> Base outside Washington, D.C. on the theme “Getting Back to the Basics.” In<br />

January, Perkins and FRC spoke out against President Obama’s plan to repeal “don’t ask,<br />

don’t tell” and urged Congress to retain the current law which excludes homosexuals<br />

from openly serving in the military. Two days later, Perkins received a letter from the<br />

chaplain's office at Andrews AFB rescinding the invitation to speak at the prayer<br />

luncheon, citing FRC statements “which are incompatible in our role as military members<br />

who serve our elected officials and our Commander in Chief.”<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!