Annandale Transportation Study - Fairfax County Office of ...
Annandale Transportation Study - Fairfax County Office of ...
Annandale Transportation Study - Fairfax County Office of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Annandale</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Study</strong> – Final Report<br />
4.3. Qualitative Network Comparison<br />
Table 13 provides a matrix summary <strong>of</strong> a study <strong>of</strong> several qualitative issues associated with transportation<br />
improvements in the study area for each <strong>of</strong> the shortlisted alternatives. The qualitative analysis highlights potential<br />
alternative impacts to traffic, utilities, property / right-<strong>of</strong>-way, pedestrian/bicyclists and transit in the corridor. An<br />
estimate <strong>of</strong> the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the costs for each alternative was made for comparison purposes only, as they are not<br />
based on details <strong>of</strong> construction costs and activities.<br />
4.4. Final Networks Selected for Public Presentation<br />
At a final meeting with <strong>Fairfax</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> and Department <strong>of</strong> Planning and Zoning, the results from the<br />
four shortlisted alternatives were reviewed and a determination was made that the <strong>County</strong> would present Alternatives<br />
2 and 5 to the public as viable alternatives for implementation. It was determined that both alternatives have similar<br />
merits overall from a traffic capacity and circulation aspect, though each alternative have a distinct set <strong>of</strong> advantages<br />
and disadvantages. The qualitative issues will be important in selecting the final preferred alternative. <strong>County</strong> staff<br />
has reservations about the ability <strong>of</strong> Alternatives 6 and 7A to handle future traffic demands and circulation in the CBC<br />
area, but are comfortable with the implementation <strong>of</strong> either Alternative 2 or 5 and that these alternatives would be<br />
more readily accepted by the Virginia Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> as long-term solution for this corridor. The<br />
widening <strong>of</strong> Little River Turnpike (for either the whole <strong>of</strong> Alternative 2 or in portions <strong>of</strong> Alternative 5) has less <strong>of</strong> an<br />
impact than previously believed because <strong>of</strong> the ability to forego the right-<strong>of</strong>-way requirements normally assumed for<br />
the continuous service drive. Traffic operation study results shows that for both Alternatives 2 and 5, the service drive<br />
has a negative impact to traffic operations at cross street intersections, particularly at the Hummer / Heritage<br />
intersection. The removal <strong>of</strong> existing portions <strong>of</strong> the service drives in the corridor substantially reduces right-<strong>of</strong>-way<br />
impacts and at the planning level, can be implemented within the VDOT access management guidelines.<br />
5. TESTING NETWORKS WITH ADDITIONAL LAND USE SCENARIOS<br />
This <strong>Annandale</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Study</strong> was originally scoped to include an evaluation <strong>of</strong> up to three alternative land use<br />
scenarios, two others that would reflect either higher or lower future land use intensities in and around to the<br />
<strong>Annandale</strong> CBC area compared to the Comprehensive Plan modeling assumptions. However, the process <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Annandale</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Study</strong> led to the further development and refinement <strong>of</strong> several <strong>of</strong> the alternative networks<br />
using the funds previously allocated to the land use scenarios. The final networks selected (Alternatives 2 and 5)<br />
have nearly identical impacts to capacity and operations within the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC network and slightly different land<br />
use scenarios would be unlikely to change either network performance or be a differentiator between the two<br />
networks. Further, the land use assumptions being developed in parallel to this study were not quite ready for<br />
analysis at the time this study was published. The <strong>County</strong> has reserved the ability to re-visit an additional land use<br />
study if warranted in the future.<br />
April 2010<br />
19