Annandale Transportation Study - Fairfax County Office of ...
Annandale Transportation Study - Fairfax County Office of ...
Annandale Transportation Study - Fairfax County Office of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Annandale</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Study</strong> – Final Report<br />
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />
<strong>Fairfax</strong> <strong>County</strong>'s Comprehensive Plan for the <strong>Annandale</strong> Community Business Center (CBC) outlines several<br />
objectives related to future development. The Comprehensive Plan recommends several significant transportation<br />
improvements that are envisioned to have a positive impact on the revitalization efforts in the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC. This<br />
<strong>Annandale</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Study</strong> was conducted to analyze transportation system network alternatives, and<br />
to develop associated recommendations for a transportation system plan that handles local and through traffic in an<br />
efficient manner, while facilitating the community redevelopment and revitalization needs.<br />
Since the 1970’s, <strong>Fairfax</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s Comprehensive Plan for the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC had included a future plan for a<br />
grade-separation <strong>of</strong> Ravensworth / <strong>Annandale</strong> and Backlick Roads over Little River Turnpike, and a widening <strong>of</strong> Little<br />
River Turnpike from four to six lanes through the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC. Understanding the potential traffic and land use<br />
impacts <strong>of</strong> these improvements, the recent <strong>Annandale</strong> Community Business Center Circulation <strong>Study</strong> recommended<br />
that a one-way paired street system be added as an option to the Comprehensive Plan as a feasible alternative to the<br />
grade-separation, and that the possible need for a flyover at <strong>Annandale</strong> and Ravensworth Roads be studied. In 2006,<br />
the <strong>County</strong> updated the <strong>Transportation</strong> element <strong>of</strong> the Comprehensive Plan to allow for some additional potential<br />
roadway improvements pending additional analysis and study. Several subsequent studies have reinforced the need<br />
for a detailed study <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> transportation network alternatives. This is the objective <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Annandale</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Study</strong>.<br />
An Existing Conditions study was performed to summarize and document technical information regarding existing<br />
traffic conditions, roadway infrastructure and previous studies performed for the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC and the greater<br />
region. As part <strong>of</strong> the effort to prepare the Existing Conditions report, a traffic-analysis microsimulation (VISSIM)<br />
model was developed to study existing transportation system operations for the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC study area that<br />
served as a basis for evaluating future transportation improvements and land use changes.<br />
Nine network alternatives were considered and, with the exception <strong>of</strong> Network 0 (No-Build), all <strong>of</strong> the alternatives<br />
included most if not all <strong>of</strong> the transportation improvements recommended in the Comprehensive Plan for <strong>Fairfax</strong><br />
<strong>County</strong>. The nine networks included:<br />
An initial analysis was performed for all nine networks that resulted in several significant conclusions. The<br />
<strong>Annandale</strong>/Ravensworth flyover was shown to provide minimal operational benefits most likely outweighed by other<br />
transportation network and land use impacts. Also, the No-Build Alternative provided inadequate capacity and<br />
operations to support the future land use growth in the greater <strong>Annandale</strong> area. From the initial operational results,<br />
network Alternatives 2, 5, 6 and 7 were selected to be shortlisted for more detailed study including qualitative and<br />
quantitative analyses.<br />
At a final meeting with <strong>Fairfax</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> and Department <strong>of</strong> Planning and Zoning, the results from the<br />
four shortlisted alternatives were reviewed and a determination was made that Alternatives 2 and 5 were the viable<br />
alternatives for implementation. Both Alternatives 2 and 5 have nearly equal merits from a traffic capacity and<br />
circulation aspect and the qualitative issues will be important in selecting the final preferred alternative. Detailed study<br />
<strong>of</strong> cross section and plan concepts <strong>of</strong> the alternatives showed that the widening <strong>of</strong> Little River Turnpike (for either the<br />
whole <strong>of</strong> Alternative 2 or in portions <strong>of</strong> Alternative 5) has less <strong>of</strong> an impact than previously believed because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ability to forego the right-<strong>of</strong>-way requirements normally assumed for the continuous service drive. The removal <strong>of</strong><br />
existing portions <strong>of</strong> the service drives in the corridor substantially reduces right-<strong>of</strong>-way impacts and allows for a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> pedestrian, bicycle, transit, land use and visual enhancements to be made in the corridor<br />
A public meeting is currently planned to be held in the spring <strong>of</strong> 2010 to explain the study process and results, and<br />
network Alternatives 2 and 5 will be presented to the public as the viable candidates for implementation. Solicitation<br />
<strong>of</strong> comments from the public regarding their view <strong>of</strong> the pros and cons <strong>of</strong> each alternative is a desired step in the<br />
process.<br />
Network 0<br />
Network 1<br />
Network 2<br />
Network 4<br />
Network 4a<br />
Network 5<br />
Network 6<br />
Network 7<br />
Network 8<br />
No improvements to the current transportation network<br />
Only the Comprehensive Plan improvements<br />
Comprehensive Plan (Network 1) WITHOUT <strong>Annandale</strong> Road overpass<br />
Comprehensive Plan EXCEPT 4 lanes on Little River Turnpike<br />
Comprehensive Plan EXCEPT 4 lanes on Little River Turnpike and WITHOUT overpass<br />
Comprehensive Plan WITHOUT overpass and one-way pair on LRT / south loop between John Marr<br />
Drive and Markham (3 WB lanes on LRT, 3 EB lanes on south loop)<br />
Comprehensive Plan W/O overpass and 4 lanes on LRT PLUS one-way pair using both north and south<br />
loops between John Marr and Markham (2 WB lanes on north loop and 2 EB lanes on south loop)<br />
Comprehensive Plan WITHOUT overpass and 3-1 pair on LRT / south loop between John Marr and<br />
Markham (3 WB & 1 EB lanes on LRT, 3 EB & 1 WB lanes on south loop)<br />
Comprehensive Plan WITHOUT overpass, with median U-turns in a wide median along the LRT corridor<br />
between Hummer/Heritage and Evergreen Lane; replaces existing service drive<br />
The networks were evaluated using VISSIM, a microscopic traffic analysis tool that provides the input <strong>of</strong> originsdestinations<br />
according to the future land uses in the corridor. The model was developed and calibrated to current<br />
conditions, and an evaluation <strong>of</strong> existing conditions compared favorably to the results from the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC<br />
Circulation <strong>Study</strong>.<br />
April 2010<br />
ii