08.05.2015 Views

Annandale Transportation Study - Fairfax County Office of ...

Annandale Transportation Study - Fairfax County Office of ...

Annandale Transportation Study - Fairfax County Office of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Annandale</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Study</strong> – Final Report<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

<strong>Fairfax</strong> <strong>County</strong>'s Comprehensive Plan for the <strong>Annandale</strong> Community Business Center (CBC) outlines several<br />

objectives related to future development. The Comprehensive Plan recommends several significant transportation<br />

improvements that are envisioned to have a positive impact on the revitalization efforts in the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC. This<br />

<strong>Annandale</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Study</strong> was conducted to analyze transportation system network alternatives, and<br />

to develop associated recommendations for a transportation system plan that handles local and through traffic in an<br />

efficient manner, while facilitating the community redevelopment and revitalization needs.<br />

Since the 1970’s, <strong>Fairfax</strong> <strong>County</strong>’s Comprehensive Plan for the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC had included a future plan for a<br />

grade-separation <strong>of</strong> Ravensworth / <strong>Annandale</strong> and Backlick Roads over Little River Turnpike, and a widening <strong>of</strong> Little<br />

River Turnpike from four to six lanes through the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC. Understanding the potential traffic and land use<br />

impacts <strong>of</strong> these improvements, the recent <strong>Annandale</strong> Community Business Center Circulation <strong>Study</strong> recommended<br />

that a one-way paired street system be added as an option to the Comprehensive Plan as a feasible alternative to the<br />

grade-separation, and that the possible need for a flyover at <strong>Annandale</strong> and Ravensworth Roads be studied. In 2006,<br />

the <strong>County</strong> updated the <strong>Transportation</strong> element <strong>of</strong> the Comprehensive Plan to allow for some additional potential<br />

roadway improvements pending additional analysis and study. Several subsequent studies have reinforced the need<br />

for a detailed study <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> transportation network alternatives. This is the objective <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Annandale</strong><br />

<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Study</strong>.<br />

An Existing Conditions study was performed to summarize and document technical information regarding existing<br />

traffic conditions, roadway infrastructure and previous studies performed for the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC and the greater<br />

region. As part <strong>of</strong> the effort to prepare the Existing Conditions report, a traffic-analysis microsimulation (VISSIM)<br />

model was developed to study existing transportation system operations for the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC study area that<br />

served as a basis for evaluating future transportation improvements and land use changes.<br />

Nine network alternatives were considered and, with the exception <strong>of</strong> Network 0 (No-Build), all <strong>of</strong> the alternatives<br />

included most if not all <strong>of</strong> the transportation improvements recommended in the Comprehensive Plan for <strong>Fairfax</strong><br />

<strong>County</strong>. The nine networks included:<br />

An initial analysis was performed for all nine networks that resulted in several significant conclusions. The<br />

<strong>Annandale</strong>/Ravensworth flyover was shown to provide minimal operational benefits most likely outweighed by other<br />

transportation network and land use impacts. Also, the No-Build Alternative provided inadequate capacity and<br />

operations to support the future land use growth in the greater <strong>Annandale</strong> area. From the initial operational results,<br />

network Alternatives 2, 5, 6 and 7 were selected to be shortlisted for more detailed study including qualitative and<br />

quantitative analyses.<br />

At a final meeting with <strong>Fairfax</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> and Department <strong>of</strong> Planning and Zoning, the results from the<br />

four shortlisted alternatives were reviewed and a determination was made that Alternatives 2 and 5 were the viable<br />

alternatives for implementation. Both Alternatives 2 and 5 have nearly equal merits from a traffic capacity and<br />

circulation aspect and the qualitative issues will be important in selecting the final preferred alternative. Detailed study<br />

<strong>of</strong> cross section and plan concepts <strong>of</strong> the alternatives showed that the widening <strong>of</strong> Little River Turnpike (for either the<br />

whole <strong>of</strong> Alternative 2 or in portions <strong>of</strong> Alternative 5) has less <strong>of</strong> an impact than previously believed because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ability to forego the right-<strong>of</strong>-way requirements normally assumed for the continuous service drive. The removal <strong>of</strong><br />

existing portions <strong>of</strong> the service drives in the corridor substantially reduces right-<strong>of</strong>-way impacts and allows for a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> pedestrian, bicycle, transit, land use and visual enhancements to be made in the corridor<br />

A public meeting is currently planned to be held in the spring <strong>of</strong> 2010 to explain the study process and results, and<br />

network Alternatives 2 and 5 will be presented to the public as the viable candidates for implementation. Solicitation<br />

<strong>of</strong> comments from the public regarding their view <strong>of</strong> the pros and cons <strong>of</strong> each alternative is a desired step in the<br />

process.<br />

Network 0<br />

Network 1<br />

Network 2<br />

Network 4<br />

Network 4a<br />

Network 5<br />

Network 6<br />

Network 7<br />

Network 8<br />

No improvements to the current transportation network<br />

Only the Comprehensive Plan improvements<br />

Comprehensive Plan (Network 1) WITHOUT <strong>Annandale</strong> Road overpass<br />

Comprehensive Plan EXCEPT 4 lanes on Little River Turnpike<br />

Comprehensive Plan EXCEPT 4 lanes on Little River Turnpike and WITHOUT overpass<br />

Comprehensive Plan WITHOUT overpass and one-way pair on LRT / south loop between John Marr<br />

Drive and Markham (3 WB lanes on LRT, 3 EB lanes on south loop)<br />

Comprehensive Plan W/O overpass and 4 lanes on LRT PLUS one-way pair using both north and south<br />

loops between John Marr and Markham (2 WB lanes on north loop and 2 EB lanes on south loop)<br />

Comprehensive Plan WITHOUT overpass and 3-1 pair on LRT / south loop between John Marr and<br />

Markham (3 WB & 1 EB lanes on LRT, 3 EB & 1 WB lanes on south loop)<br />

Comprehensive Plan WITHOUT overpass, with median U-turns in a wide median along the LRT corridor<br />

between Hummer/Heritage and Evergreen Lane; replaces existing service drive<br />

The networks were evaluated using VISSIM, a microscopic traffic analysis tool that provides the input <strong>of</strong> originsdestinations<br />

according to the future land uses in the corridor. The model was developed and calibrated to current<br />

conditions, and an evaluation <strong>of</strong> existing conditions compared favorably to the results from the <strong>Annandale</strong> CBC<br />

Circulation <strong>Study</strong>.<br />

April 2010<br />

ii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!