16.05.2015 Views

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowlands Restoration <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />

<strong>2008</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

abandoned. Of these, 174 total chicks were produced in <strong>2008</strong> and a minimum of 57 and a maximum of<br />

109 (32.8 to 62.6%) chicks survived to fledge. The minimum fledgling estimate per nest (0.85<br />

fledglings/nest) is slightly below the average (0.95 fledglings/nest) of the study years. The maximum<br />

estimate of fledglings per nest (1.62 fledglings/nest) would exceed the previous high of 1.47 in 2005.<br />

Avian monitoring recommendations include continuing the Belding’s Savannah sparrow monitoring<br />

program to include a minimum of 2 surveys per breeding season and implementation of the<br />

management recommendations detailed in the snowy plover report (Appendix 1-F).<br />

INLET FLOOD SHOAL<br />

The rate and distribution of sand accretion in the FTB inlet was assessed by bathymetric survey in<br />

January and June 2007, and in January, July, and December <strong>2008</strong>. The volume and distribution of<br />

accumulated sand was compared to the pre-basin opening conditions of August 2006. A small shoal<br />

had formed in the inlet by January 2007 and continued to expand through 2007 and <strong>2008</strong>. The net<br />

volume of sediment (composed entirely of littoral sand) accreted within the assessment polygon was<br />

compared to the pre-opening conditions and had reached 204,923 m 3 by December <strong>2008</strong>. This can be<br />

expressed as a total rate of volume change from the basin opening through December <strong>2008</strong>, roughly 28<br />

months later, of approximately 240 m 3 /day. It is important to note, however, that this average rate<br />

does not represent the actual accretion per day, as deposition and erosion occurred throughout the<br />

period at an uneven rate.<br />

To examine this variable rate, the contour plots of each survey were compared to each other to quantify<br />

areas of erosion and accretion between surveys. As anticipated, there was a large input of sand<br />

between the basin opening on August 24, 2006 and the first survey on January 19, 2007, with an<br />

average of 402 m 3 /day. The influx rate then decreased between subsequent surveys, to an average of<br />

230 m 3 /day in 2007 and 134 m 3 /day in <strong>2008</strong>.<br />

The flood shoal volume, area of shoaling, and shoaling rate have occurred similarly to processes<br />

predicted during the project design. The variable seasonal influx of sand, and added complication of<br />

provision of local source sand in the pre-filled ebb bar and beach around the mouth, is expected to<br />

have played a role in the high early infill rates. Further, early infill would have also added sand to the<br />

oversized entrance channel, thus decreasing the observed rate of shoaling from the true rate since the<br />

flood shoal survey assessment area does not extend out fully into the entrance channel. Subsequent<br />

reduced rates of infill may indicate more rapid achievement of relative stability following the initial<br />

system loading.<br />

Future monitoring of the flood shoal will occur in January and June of 2009 and 2010.<br />

TIDAL MONITORING<br />

Accretion of sand within the flood shoal of the FTB is the most important factor causing tidal lag and<br />

muting. Tidal monitoring provides a means of tracking the lag and muting and providing information<br />

necessary to determine the need for maintenance dredging to ensure proper physical and ecological<br />

system functioning.<br />

Tidal monitoring began in the FTB in December 2006 and was continuous throughout <strong>2008</strong>.<br />

Comparison of the lower low tide data for each day showed that the FTB did not completely drain to<br />

local oceanic sea levels (as measured at Los Angeles Outer Harbor [LAOH]) during lower low spring<br />

Merkel & Associates, Inc. 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!