16.05.2015 Views

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowlands Restoration <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />

<strong>2008</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

nearest 0.0001 gram using an analytical balance. All samples were returned to the alcohol solution and<br />

archived for future reference.<br />

Because the benthic monitoring program was intended to broadly characterize the communities of<br />

infaunal organisms within the FTB of <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong>, species level classification was not deemed<br />

necessary. Rather, data were assembled into logical, higher-order taxonomic groups.<br />

Epifauna<br />

The epibenthic invertebrate sampling program made use of both a<br />

focused quadrat investigation and a more expansive field effort<br />

undertaken as a part of the fish community surveys. For the quadrat<br />

survey, a 1-m 2 quadrat was tossed randomly at each of the sampling<br />

points, and at the two tidal elevations (+1 foot and -2 feet NAVD),<br />

utilized for the infauna coring (Figure 1-11). All epifaunal organisms<br />

present on the surface of the substrate within the quadrat boundary<br />

were identified and counted. Macroalgae present in the quadrat were<br />

also recorded.<br />

Epibenthic quadrat sampling.<br />

Additionally, during the completion of fish studies described above the incidental by-catch of<br />

epibenthic invertebrates was collected, identified, and counted to further enhance the detection of<br />

epibenthic organisms and characterize their distribution, composition, and rough abundance within the<br />

FTB. Because of the incidental nature of these collections, density information was not generated<br />

from the count data.<br />

Only representatives of those organisms that could not be positively identified in the field were<br />

collected for subsequent laboratory taxonomy and voucher collections. These individuals were<br />

preserved in a 10% formalin:seawater mixture and transported to the laboratory for identification.<br />

After approximately one week, organisms were transferred into 70% isopropyl alcohol and identified.<br />

Results<br />

Infauna<br />

In January <strong>2008</strong>, nine phyla were collected in the infauna cores, with most taxa represented at both<br />

elevations. Table 1-13 presents the mean density of infauna for the three replicates at each station and<br />

elevation. Polychaetes were the dominant taxa, accounting for 61% of the total abundance. Tanaids<br />

and bivalves were the second and third most abundant (21% and 4% of the total, respectively). Total<br />

density was higher at the –2-foot elevation than at the +1-foot elevation, driven primarily by greater<br />

numbers of polychaetes, amphipods, and tanaids at the lower elevation. Table 1-14 presents the mean<br />

biomass (g/m 2 ) of infauna for the three replicates at each station and elevation in January. Infaunal<br />

biomass in January was dominated by bivalves, gastropods, and polychaetes at all stations.<br />

Merkel & Associates, Inc. 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!