16.05.2015 Views

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowlands Restoration <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />

<strong>2008</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

settlement of the East MTB water control structure (WCS) on which the FTB tide gauge is mounted.<br />

As this structure settled downward, it suggested a rising water elevation in the FTB and thus the<br />

subtracted difference from LAOH tide station data would indicate negative values. This artifact in the<br />

data is an order of magnitude less important than the measured muting rates within the FTB, but it is<br />

important to understanding sources of tidal measurement error at the site.<br />

The overall differences in the high tide elevations are relatively small as shown in Table 2-2, with a<br />

2007-<strong>2008</strong> average difference of less than 0.007m. Given the anticipated settlement of WCSs, and thus<br />

the attached FTB gauge and the relatively minor variation from LAOH it is clear that no consequential<br />

muting of the high tides within the FTB has occurred.<br />

When examining the maximum spring tide muting that occurs at low tide on a spring-neap tidal cycle<br />

basis, the severity is much more pronounced than is evidenced during mean low tides or higher low<br />

tides. Table 2-2 also presents the low spring tide muting in the FTB in comparison to oceanic<br />

conditions at LAOH. This was calculated by subtracting the spring low tide in the FTB from the<br />

equivalent oceanic low tide at the LAOH gauge. When the low tide muting is graphed as a function of<br />

time (Figure2-6) several aspects of the FTB muting are revealed. First, the data indicate the presence<br />

of seasonal variation in muting, with an increase in the winter and mid-summer months when larger<br />

than average tidal ranges occur, and decreased muting during the spring and fall months when smaller<br />

than average tidal cycles occur. Figure 2-6 also shows fairly substantial changes in muting rates<br />

between months, including a relatively precipitous acceleration in the extent of muting in the system<br />

overall beginning in January <strong>2008</strong>. Prior to that month, little change in the extent of muting was seen.<br />

After January <strong>2008</strong>, there was a sharp increase in muting through approximately April <strong>2008</strong> after<br />

which time the spring tide low tide muting remained fairly constant through the remainder of the year.<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

Spring Tide Low Tide Muting (m)<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

Nov-06<br />

Dec-06<br />

Jan-07<br />

Feb-07<br />

Mar-07<br />

Apr-07<br />

May-07<br />

Jun-07<br />

Jul-07<br />

Aug-07<br />

Sep-07<br />

Oct-07<br />

Nov-07<br />

Dec-07<br />

Jan-08<br />

Feb-08<br />

Mar-08<br />

Apr-08<br />

May-08<br />

Jun-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Jul-08<br />

Aug-08<br />

Sep-08<br />

Oct-08<br />

Nov-08<br />

Dec-08<br />

Jan-09<br />

Feb-09<br />

Figure 2-6. Maximum spring low tide muting (Muting reflects the maximum difference between the FTB and<br />

corresponding LAOH low tides)<br />

Merkel & Associates, Inc. 111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!