16.05.2015 Views

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

2008 Annual Monitoring Report (pdf 10.9MB) - Bolsa Chica ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> Lowlands Restoration <strong>Monitoring</strong><br />

<strong>2008</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> <strong>Report</strong><br />

develop a set of “synthetic” profiles for the survey years with data that were not coincident with the<br />

CCSTWS-OC transect locations (typically the pre-1992 surveys). For the purposes of the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong><br />

monitoring program, the same TIN model approach was used to “re-generate” the synthetic profiles<br />

used in the CCSTWS-OC. This approach was not necessary for the data that were coincident with the<br />

transect locations (1992-1997 and 2002).<br />

The LIDAR data consists of densely spaced topographic points derived from an airborne survey.<br />

These data encompass the entire shoreline of the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> study area, but do not extend below the<br />

waterline. Beach profiles were created at each of the five historical transects and the two newly<br />

established transects using a TIN model developed from the LIDAR results.<br />

Synthetic profiles also were developed for the two newly established transects for March 2002 and<br />

several of the pre-1992 CCSTWS-OC survey dates. Using the same TIN model approach described<br />

above, synthetic profiles were created for each case when historical survey data bracketed the location<br />

of the two newly established transects and at least one of the bracketing transects was not coincident<br />

with a historical transect. Profiles were generated for the following eight survey years: May 1963,<br />

July 1964, October 1966, April 1969, May 1973, April 1982, January 1983, and March 2002.<br />

Historical Beach Width Measurements<br />

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers personnel have acquired monthly beach width measurements along the<br />

Orange County coast since 1977. This extensive data set was initiated by Robert Clancy. Since the<br />

late 1980’s, Chuck Mesa of the Corps has continued the monthly data collection program.<br />

The data set contains measurements from a consistent back beach position to the break-in-slope at the<br />

beach berm. The location of the berm does not represent a vertically-referenced shoreline (such as the<br />

MSL shoreline). However, the measurements do provide an indication of gross changes in beach<br />

configuration. To differentiate these measurements from beach widths derived from profile data or<br />

from the beach width measurements collected on behalf of the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> project, they will be<br />

referred to hereafter as “Corps beach widths”.<br />

Three of the measurement stations are located within or immediately adjacent to the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> study<br />

area: 247+88, 308+88, and 424+44. These stations are not coincident with the transect locations used<br />

for the CCSTWS-OC or the <strong>Bolsa</strong> <strong>Chica</strong> monitoring program. The beach width measurements at these<br />

stations were retrieved from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Mesa <strong>2008</strong>b, 2009).<br />

Methodology<br />

Beach Profile Surveys<br />

Beach profile data were obtained on two occasions in <strong>2008</strong>: May 12 and October 28. The methods<br />

employed were similar to those used on previous Orange County surveys. In consequence, the results<br />

are directly comparable. The data acquisition and reduction methods are described below.<br />

The wading and bathymetric portions of each survey were performed concurrently by two crews, as<br />

illustrated in Figure 2-10. Data were acquired along each transect from the back beach to a depth of<br />

approximately 14 m below NAVD88. Wave heights typically were less than 1 m during each of the<br />

surveys.<br />

Merkel & Associates, Inc. 118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!