WAVLD Symposium Handbook_V4.indd - csiro
WAVLD Symposium Handbook_V4.indd - csiro
WAVLD Symposium Handbook_V4.indd - csiro
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Tues 13 November<br />
World Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians – 13 th International <strong>Symposium</strong>, Melbourne, Australia, 11-14 November 2007<br />
APPLICATION OF BIOTECHNOLOGY TO INFECTIONS WITHIN WILDLIFE HOSTS<br />
D J Middleton<br />
CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, PB24 Geelong 3220<br />
“Wildlife enters the frame”<br />
Wildlife health is complicated and essentially unexplored, while intervention strategies are even less clear.<br />
This is the case even for infectious diseases that affect wildlife hosts although they are of special<br />
significance for diverse reasons. Firstly, their control is necessary for the protection of human health: of the<br />
1415 recognised human pathogens, 61% are zoonotic and wildlife is often a link in the chain of emergence.<br />
Secondly, wildlife pathogens influence domestic animal health and by association the human food supply,<br />
with spillover of known emergency animal diseases providing particular political, conservation and<br />
commercial challenges. Thirdly, they may be the sign of a stressed ecosystem and represent a risk to<br />
biodiversity, especially where keystone species such as a top predator are affected leading, for example, to<br />
a population explosion of herbivores and overexploitation of plants. Ultimately, the casualties of this process<br />
will be loss of ecosystem services such as tourism and “existence value”. Climate change, with the potential<br />
for emergence of new diseases as well as changed wildlife and vector competencies and distribution,<br />
generates additional levels of complexity. Finally, infectious disease control is essential across the broader<br />
national canvas to safeguard trade, the wider economy and for national security.<br />
Deployment of late 20 th C to 21 st C biotechnology is essential for the purpose of enhancing the assessment<br />
and management of infectious disease threats in wildlife. Specific applications include the discovery of<br />
elusive wildlife reservoirs using high sensitivity, high throughput testing systems, such as those employed in<br />
the discovery of fruit bats as the reservoir of Ebola virus. Contemporary biotechnology also has enabled<br />
incidence and prevalence studies, on which epidemiologic data effective disease management relies, to be<br />
carried out in reservoir animals, including surveillance and diagnosis for serious zoonotic diseases such as<br />
Nipah virus infections in Pteropus lylei where Biosafety Level 3 and 4 laboratories are not available. Modern<br />
technologies have contributed greatly to our understanding of the mechanism of host-switching by<br />
pathogens and post-spillover host adaptation, most notably for viral agents such as SARS-CoV from<br />
Rhinolophus spp. to civet cats to people, but also for bacteria including M.bovis in badgers to cattle to<br />
people. They will increasingly be employed in pathogenesis research of intra-reservoir transmission to<br />
provide decision support tools for preventing spillover to humans or livestock through discovery of novel<br />
targets for diagnosis or control. In particular, new whole genome sequencing technologies will lead to rapid<br />
sequencing of novel emerging microorganisms. Optimisation of in silico design of detection tests or<br />
countermeasures will depend upon the availability of accurate genomic surveys of the natural microbiota<br />
within the reservoirs from which they have emerged. Although currently limited, primarily due to lack of<br />
definition of critical intervention points, there are also examples of biotechnology applications to disease<br />
control in wildlife. The most notable of these is the live recombinant oral rabies vaccine targeting wild<br />
carnivores that has been used extensively and effectively in both Europe and the United States.<br />
There is developing acceptance within certain governments of a level of responsibility for the identification<br />
and management of risks from wildlife to human and livestock health as well as on wildlife populations,<br />
although it is less clear who should share ownership of this. Also unclear is the optimum mechanism for<br />
robust collection, amalgamation, and assessment of surveillance data. The notion that detection of an<br />
unusual event may be the first sign of a major epidemic should always be towards the front of our minds. It is<br />
almost certain that modern laboratory methods will play a central role in characterization, assessment and<br />
management of the next such event.<br />
One world, one health, one medicine<br />
Introduction<br />
World Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians – 13 th International <strong>Symposium</strong>, Melbourne, Australia, 11-14 November 2007<br />
THE OIE CONCEPT OF TWINNING BETWEEN LABORATORIES<br />
G.K. Brückner, World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE)<br />
The OIE acknowledge that the most effective way to effectively detect, diagnose, control and respond to<br />
animal disease and zoonotic incursions, is to ensure good veterinary governance in Member Countries and<br />
by assisting and enabling them to move towards compliance with the international standards of the OIE.<br />
The OIE has in response to this need secured substantial donor support to embark on a unique strategic<br />
initiative for the assessment and evaluation of the veterinary services of developing and transitional countries<br />
by identifying weaknesses in their system that hinders compliance, prevent the early detection and diagnosis<br />
of diseases and limiting access to expertise to provide scientific justification for certification of animals and<br />
animal products for trade.<br />
A critical prerequisite in achieving this ideal would also be to facilitate and encourage a more even global<br />
geographical spread and access to available scientific expertise and veterinary diagnostics.<br />
Discussion<br />
There are currently 170 OIE Reference Laboratories in 30 countries with 146 designated experts covering 93<br />
diseases. The total number of OIE Collaborating Centres is 24 in 14 countries covering 22 functional aspects<br />
related to diseases and OIE activities. More than 70% of the 170 Member Countries of the OIE are from<br />
developing countries whilst the majority of OIE Reference Laboratories and Collaborating Centres are<br />
clustered within developed countries within the northern hemisphere. During the First International<br />
Conference for OIE Reference Laboratories and Collaborating Centres held in Florianopolis, Brazil in<br />
December 2006, delegates unanimously supported a recommendation to establish closer relationships<br />
between OIE Reference Laboratories and Collaborating Centres and candidate laboratories in developing<br />
and transitional countries. The main thrust would be to encourage a more even global geographical spread<br />
of diagnostic expertise and by that, giving developing and transitional countries more ready access to<br />
scientific expertise enable them to become scientifically competent and to debate on equal footing on the<br />
scientific justification of standards.<br />
To enhance this request for a closer relationship between OIE Reference Laboratories and laboratories such<br />
as national laboratories with a potential of eventually becoming a Reference Laboratory on their own, the<br />
concept of twinning between laboratories was initiated. The main objective of twinning is to assist<br />
laboratories in developing or in-transition countries to build their capacity and scientific expertise with the<br />
eventual aim that some of them could become OIE Reference Laboratories in their own right. To practically<br />
apply this concept, a link between an existing OIE Reference Laboratory with another laboratory in a<br />
developing or in- transition country must be established in a medium to long-term relationship for exchange<br />
of scientific expertise and capacity building. Taking into consideration the current geographical spread and<br />
actual localities of OIE Reference Laboratories and Collaborating Centres, the twinning concept could imply<br />
a transfer of knowledge, training and expertise from the ‘North’ to the ‘South’ or from an existing OIE<br />
Reference Laboratory or Collaborating Centre of the South to another less advanced laboratory in the South<br />
applying for such assistance.<br />
References<br />
1. OIE, Performance, Vision and Strategy: A tool for governance of Veterinary Services, OIE 2007<br />
(World Organisation for Animal Health), 12, rue de Prony, 75017, Paris, France.<br />
2. E. Erlacher-Vindel, G.K. Brückner, B. Vallat. The OIE Concept of Laboratory Twinning in<br />
Lombard M, Dodet B (eds): First International Conference of the OIE Reference Laboratories<br />
and Collaborating Centres. Dev Biol (basel). Basel, Karger, 2007, vol 128, pp 115-119.<br />
Tues 13 November