03.06.2015 Views

Download PDF - Keppel Land

Download PDF - Keppel Land

Download PDF - Keppel Land

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chairman’s Message<br />

On behalf of the Board, I present the <strong>Keppel</strong> <strong>Land</strong><br />

Group report for the year ended 31 December 2001.<br />

Financial Performance<br />

2001 was a difficult year for the Group, worsened by<br />

the September 11 attacks in the US.<br />

The rapid deterioration of the US economy quickly<br />

spiralled into a global downturn, tripping the fragile<br />

recovery of Asian economies. With most of its major<br />

markets affected, Singapore slipped into its worst<br />

recession in four decades.<br />

Like many companies, <strong>Keppel</strong> <strong>Land</strong> was hit by the<br />

weaker economic prospects in Singapore and the<br />

region. With lower contribution from property trading<br />

due to fewer residential sales, revenue fell 40% to<br />

$300.5 million. Higher profit contribution from<br />

property investment from the mostly fully-occupied<br />

office buildings could not offset the shortfall from<br />

property trading.<br />

Chairman Lim Chee Onn<br />

buildings by $239 million, after taking into account<br />

minority interests’ share and a surplus of $51 million<br />

not taken up in 2000. This revaluation deficit was<br />

charged against the previous years’ surpluses of<br />

$898 million accumulated under capital reserves in<br />

the balance sheet.<br />

Chairman’s Message<br />

9<br />

Against a soft residential market in Singapore, the<br />

Company made provisions for a write-down of<br />

$455.1 million in respect of its landbank. As a result,<br />

the Group incurred a loss of $366.5 million after tax<br />

and minority interests. This is in contrast with a profit<br />

of $122.1 million in 2000. Had it not been for the<br />

provisions, the Group’s profit for 2001 would have<br />

been $88.6 million.<br />

As capital values of Singapore office buildings fell, the<br />

Company wrote down the value of its investment<br />

With the provisions and revaluation adjustments<br />

made, shareholders’ funds declined from $2.24 billion<br />

to $1.62 billion at the end of 2001. Consequently, the<br />

Company’s net tangible asset per share fell to $2.28<br />

from $3.16 a year ago. The Group’s debt-equity ratio<br />

including minority interests rose to 1.28 from 0.83<br />

the year before.<br />

The effective tax rate for the Group before provisions<br />

was 24.5% in 2001, unchanged from the previous<br />

year.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!