Download PDF - Keppel Land
Download PDF - Keppel Land
Download PDF - Keppel Land
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chairman’s Message<br />
On behalf of the Board, I present the <strong>Keppel</strong> <strong>Land</strong><br />
Group report for the year ended 31 December 2001.<br />
Financial Performance<br />
2001 was a difficult year for the Group, worsened by<br />
the September 11 attacks in the US.<br />
The rapid deterioration of the US economy quickly<br />
spiralled into a global downturn, tripping the fragile<br />
recovery of Asian economies. With most of its major<br />
markets affected, Singapore slipped into its worst<br />
recession in four decades.<br />
Like many companies, <strong>Keppel</strong> <strong>Land</strong> was hit by the<br />
weaker economic prospects in Singapore and the<br />
region. With lower contribution from property trading<br />
due to fewer residential sales, revenue fell 40% to<br />
$300.5 million. Higher profit contribution from<br />
property investment from the mostly fully-occupied<br />
office buildings could not offset the shortfall from<br />
property trading.<br />
Chairman Lim Chee Onn<br />
buildings by $239 million, after taking into account<br />
minority interests’ share and a surplus of $51 million<br />
not taken up in 2000. This revaluation deficit was<br />
charged against the previous years’ surpluses of<br />
$898 million accumulated under capital reserves in<br />
the balance sheet.<br />
Chairman’s Message<br />
9<br />
Against a soft residential market in Singapore, the<br />
Company made provisions for a write-down of<br />
$455.1 million in respect of its landbank. As a result,<br />
the Group incurred a loss of $366.5 million after tax<br />
and minority interests. This is in contrast with a profit<br />
of $122.1 million in 2000. Had it not been for the<br />
provisions, the Group’s profit for 2001 would have<br />
been $88.6 million.<br />
As capital values of Singapore office buildings fell, the<br />
Company wrote down the value of its investment<br />
With the provisions and revaluation adjustments<br />
made, shareholders’ funds declined from $2.24 billion<br />
to $1.62 billion at the end of 2001. Consequently, the<br />
Company’s net tangible asset per share fell to $2.28<br />
from $3.16 a year ago. The Group’s debt-equity ratio<br />
including minority interests rose to 1.28 from 0.83<br />
the year before.<br />
The effective tax rate for the Group before provisions<br />
was 24.5% in 2001, unchanged from the previous<br />
year.