06.06.2015 Views

Siting Study - Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project

Siting Study - Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project

Siting Study - Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Siting</strong> <strong>Study</strong><br />

<strong>Boardman</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Hemingway</strong> <strong>Transmission</strong> <strong>Line</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />

3.3.6 Blue Mountain Region<br />

The Blue Mountain Region is located in the central part of the study area on the western edge of Baker<br />

County and northeastern Grant County, spanning across the Blue Mountains <strong>to</strong> Sharp Ridge as shown on<br />

Figure 3.3.6-1. Situated at the convergence of the Malheur, Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman National<br />

Forests, just north of the Middle Fork of the John Day River, the region covers severe terrain and pristine<br />

forests, with numerous special status fish streams and habitat res<strong>to</strong>ration areas. State Highway 7, the<br />

Journey Through Time Scenic Byway, is located at the southeastern end of the region, while U.S.<br />

Highway 395 runs north-south approximately 7 miles west of the northwestern end of the region. The<br />

sparsely populated <strong>to</strong>wns of Galena and Susanville lie in the southwestern part of the region, while the<br />

communities of Greenhorn and Robinsonville are located in the southeastern part of this region.<br />

The Central PAT routing session resulted in CAP route C6 passing through the Blue Mountains and south<br />

of Sharp Ridge in this region. CAP route C6 was slightly revised and designated GR1-BA1, the South<br />

Route in the Blue Mountain Region. The North Route, GR1-GR2-BA1, which attempted <strong>to</strong> minimize<br />

crossings of special status streams and fish res<strong>to</strong>ration areas, is located through the Blue Mountains and<br />

north of Sharp Ridge, and can be seen as another revision of CAP route C6.<br />

These routes were analyzed for permitting difficulty, construction difficulty and potential mitigation<br />

costs. Figure 3.3.6-2 graphically displays the results of these analyses. The permitting difficulty and<br />

mitigation cost analyses show the routes <strong>to</strong> be similar; however, the North Route crosses about 2 more<br />

miles of high permitting difficulty than the South Route. The construction difficulty analysis was more<br />

informative, indicating that although these two routes are similar in <strong>to</strong>tal miles of moderate and high<br />

permitting difficulty there are an additional 11.9 miles of high construction difficulty along the North<br />

Route. See Table 3.3.6-1 for mileage summaries of the analyses. Table D-6 in Appendix D details the<br />

constraints crossed along each route. Of note is the fact that the South Route completely avoids USFS<br />

Partial Retention lands as well as the USFS Special Interest Area for Fish Management, while the North<br />

Route crosses 3.5 and 17.0 miles respectively of each area. For the reasons explained above, the South<br />

Route (CAP route C6) was recommended as more reasonable than the North Route (CAP route C6) in the<br />

Blue Mountain Region.<br />

August 2010 3-33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!