06.06.2015 Views

Siting Study - Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project

Siting Study - Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project

Siting Study - Boardman to Hemingway Transmission Line Project

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Siting</strong> <strong>Study</strong><br />

<strong>Boardman</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Hemingway</strong> <strong>Transmission</strong> <strong>Line</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />

3.3.13 Lime Region<br />

The routing analysis within the Lime Region included two routes located on the west side of I-84, just<br />

south of the Weatherby Region, as shown on Figure 3.3.13-1. Similar <strong>to</strong> the Weatherby Region, much of<br />

this region comprises severe <strong>to</strong>pography and is located on the east side of Table Rock. This is the smallest<br />

region, covering just over 5 miles in the vicinity of Lime, Oregon.<br />

The two CAP routes developed in this area were C4 and S7 and both had the intended purpose of<br />

following existing corridors. CAP route C4 was minimally revised <strong>to</strong> parallel the west side of an existing<br />

138-kV transmission line through the region and later was designated the West Route, BA14-BA16. CAP<br />

route S7 was intended <strong>to</strong> immediately parallel I-84 but due <strong>to</strong> the steep <strong>to</strong>pography adjacent <strong>to</strong> I-84,<br />

portions of the route in this vicinity were relocated <strong>to</strong> avoid more difficult engineering and construction<br />

conditions. This route was designated the East Route, BA14-BA15-BA16.<br />

Figure 3.3.13-2 shows the results of the permitting difficulty, construction difficulty and mitigation cost<br />

analyses along each route in the Lime Region. Table 3.3.13-1 is the summary table detailing the <strong>to</strong>tals of<br />

each difficulty analysis. As this table details, the West Route has significantly fewer miles of high<br />

permitting difficulty and high construction difficulty. Additionally, Table D-13 in Appendix D shows the<br />

West Route avoids both the 1,200-foot His<strong>to</strong>ric Trail Buffer Zone and the 1,200-foot Scenic Byway<br />

Buffer Zone that are crossed by the East Route and crosses 1.8 fewer miles of slopes greater than 35<br />

percent as compared <strong>to</strong> the East Route.<br />

Table 3.3.13-1 Lime Region Summary of Permitting and Construction Difficulty and Mitigation<br />

Cost<br />

Permitting Difficulty<br />

Construction Difficulty<br />

Mitigation Cost<br />

West Route<br />

(BA14-BA16)<br />

East Route<br />

(BA14-BA15-BA16)<br />

Length in Miles<br />

Low 0.0 0.0<br />

Moderate 5.2 2.9<br />

High 0.7 3.1<br />

Exclusion 0.0 0.0<br />

Low 0.0 1.7<br />

Moderate 5.9 0.0<br />

High 0.0 4.3<br />

Low 0.0 0.0<br />

Moderate 5.9 6.0<br />

High 0.0 0.0<br />

The result of the Lime Regional analysis was that the West Route, BA14-BA16 (CAP route C4), was<br />

recommended as more reasonable than the East Route, BA14-BA15-BA16 (CAP route S7).<br />

August 2010 3-71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!