Letting of Contracts at Central TAFE Public Hearing AM session

More documents

Recommendations

Info

13/28/glj Joe was raising. 4/10/06 MUSSON, S.D. XN 198 Spark & Cannon
14/29/rds Are you aware that one of the unsuccessful bidders on this project wrote a letter of complaint?---Yes. I want to show you that letter now. It's CCC bar code 9382. This is a letter dated 24 October 2003 from one of the consultants who bid on the student journey project. Just scroll down so we can see the questions. I just want to focus on questions 4 and 5. Question 4 is: And 5: Is it correct that TAFE has an extended history of contracting with Shared Services or its principal under other business names? If correct, how is this not bias or giving an unfair advantage? Did any previous contracts to Shared Services or its principal provide inside information that was not available to other bidders, ie not included in the tender document? Did you have some role in providing a response to that letter?---Yes, I did. In fact you wrote or authored the letter of response. Isn't that correct?---No. Phil drafted me a response. Actually his first response was - I think it was Phil. His first response didn't actually address the questions that were being asked or his first draft, so I sent it back to him asking him to redraft it, trying to address the questions in a more specific way. So I may well have signed the response. I think I was happy with what he had given in the end but yeah, I do recall actually saying to Phil, you know, like, "We need to really try and address this guy's concerns," and the first draft didn't really do that. So yes, I certainly played a role in it. I may well have signed the letter. I can't recall now whether I did or not. 4/10/06 MUSSON, S.D. XN 199 11.07 Spark & Cannon
Page 1 and 2: Copyright in this document is reser
Page 3 and 4: 1/3/rds And then you add 20 per cen
Page 5 and 6: 2/5/glj So there has been noncompli
Page 7 and 8: 3/7/mjd Didn't Gary Fitzgerald come
Page 9 and 10: 4/9/rds there was, you know, the pr
Page 11 and 12: 5/11/mjd the originating email it's
Page 13 and 14: 6/13/glj You were on corporate exec
Page 15 and 16: 7/15/rds they were fully aware of t
Page 17 and 18: 8/17/mjd Going forward Central TAFE
Page 19 and 20: 9/19/glj No, but as a proposition,
Page 21 and 22: 10/21/mjd someone on a casual basis
Page 23 and 24: 11/23/rds but if she has breaks in
Page 25 and 26: 12/25/mjd that you go through." Why
Page 27: 13/27/glj there was some issues. I
Page 31 and 32: 15/31/mjd say that. Well, if you ha
Page 33 and 34: 16/33/rds THE COMMISSIONER: commenc
Page 35 and 36: 17/35/glj Now, did you sign a confi
Page 37 and 38: 18/37/mjd There's no doubt in your
Page 39 and 40: 19/39/rds I think I understand. Cou
Page 41 and 42: 20/41/glj But you think that they g
Page 43 and 44: 20/43/glj staff and it was starting
Page 45 and 46: 21/45/mjd Central TAFE. Is that cor
Page 47 and 48: 22/47/rds How did you know it was g
Page 49 and 50: 23/49/glj Why did you tell him it c
Page 51 and 52: 24/51/mjd Now, this is an email fro
Page 53 and 54: 25/53/rds Did she explain why she c
Page 55 and 56: 26/55/glj Well, you are right and I
Page 57 and 58: 27/57/mjd So you put this together,
Page 59 and 60: 28/59/mjd Yes, I'm not criticising
Page 61 and 62: 29/61/glj Was there ever an evaluat
Page 63 and 64: 30/63/rds I want to show you the do
Page 65 and 66: 31/65/rds We will go to the letter
Page 67 and 68: 32/67/mjd Do you know why full cont

Letting of Contracts at Central TAFE Public Hearing AM session

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?