20.06.2015 Views

Letting of Contracts at Central TAFE Public Hearing AM session

Letting of Contracts at Central TAFE Public Hearing AM session

Letting of Contracts at Central TAFE Public Hearing AM session

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4/8/rds<br />

Why was it going to go over the limit? Wh<strong>at</strong> happened?---I<br />

think as I said yesterday, the whole problem throughout<br />

this process from wh<strong>at</strong> I could see is we kept adding on<br />

stuff and I suspect it was probably as a result <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong><br />

th<strong>at</strong>, you know, we would be clear about wh<strong>at</strong> we wanted <strong>at</strong><br />

the start but then as time progressed, either the managing<br />

director or the college executive would make some decisions<br />

which would then need some further investig<strong>at</strong>ion or some<br />

further work - rel<strong>at</strong>ed-type work done and th<strong>at</strong> I think<br />

seemed to be a fairly consistent thing th<strong>at</strong> happened right<br />

across the process. I mean, it was like my - my acting was<br />

supposed to go three months into the first term. It then<br />

went out to an expression <strong>of</strong> interest for six and then it<br />

ended up being nearly 18 months. So I mean, I think th<strong>at</strong><br />

was fairly typical <strong>of</strong> how things kept rolling on very<br />

quickly. I mean, some <strong>of</strong> those things were forced by<br />

funding arrangements. The Department <strong>of</strong> Educ<strong>at</strong>ion and<br />

Training I think were withdrawing a fairly significant<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> funding <strong>at</strong> some stage through th<strong>at</strong> process and I<br />

think th<strong>at</strong> certainly contributed to our need, you know, to<br />

continue to look <strong>at</strong> our structure and scrutinise wh<strong>at</strong> we<br />

did.<br />

From your involvement in the functional review, would you<br />

say th<strong>at</strong> there was a lack <strong>of</strong> planning th<strong>at</strong> caused all <strong>of</strong><br />

these add-ons th<strong>at</strong> you talk about?---I mean, with the<br />

benefit <strong>of</strong> hindsight one could say th<strong>at</strong>. However, there<br />

were things th<strong>at</strong> came out <strong>of</strong> left field a bit but, you<br />

know, it would probably be a bit unfair to say th<strong>at</strong> too<br />

because - you know, things like the funding cuts and th<strong>at</strong>,<br />

I don't think they were in the wind <strong>at</strong> the time we started<br />

the process. So like, on one hand, yes, you could say th<strong>at</strong><br />

but I think it also could be a bit unfair because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

things coming out <strong>of</strong> left field.<br />

I want to show you a letter now. It's CCC bar code 9360.<br />

It's a letter from Ms Saleh-Evans addressed to yourself.<br />

All right. It's a letter d<strong>at</strong>ed 29 May 2003. The<br />

letterhead is Str<strong>at</strong>egic and IT Consulting Services and it's<br />

addressed to yourself, Steve Musson, acting general<br />

manager, inform<strong>at</strong>ion and resources?---Yes.<br />

Just have a look <strong>at</strong> the body <strong>of</strong> the letter. The heading is<br />

Functional Review Phase 3, Scope Vari<strong>at</strong>ion?---Yes.<br />

Th<strong>at</strong>'s a letter from Arwa Saleh-Evans to yourself<br />

explaining th<strong>at</strong> there has been an expansion <strong>of</strong> the phase 3<br />

project and th<strong>at</strong> she will need more money, isn't it?---Yes,<br />

it seems to be; yeah.<br />

The letter is addressed to you. Why is th<strong>at</strong>? Are you sure<br />

you weren't the project manager?---A hundred per cent sure.<br />

I think wh<strong>at</strong> confuses things here is there was the process<br />

administr<strong>at</strong>or which was sort <strong>of</strong> like my role; it was, you<br />

know, to pay the bills, get all the stuff happening and<br />

4/10/06 MUSSON, S.D. XN 178<br />

10/17<br />

Spark & Cannon

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!