04.07.2015 Views

Alternaria redefined - CBS - KNAW

Alternaria redefined - CBS - KNAW

Alternaria redefined - CBS - KNAW

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Woudenberg et al.<br />

hyphomycetes, further complicating the taxonomic resolution in<br />

this group of fungi. Several re-descriptions and revised criteria of<br />

these genera (Saccardo 1886, Elliot 1917, Wiltshire 1933, 1938,<br />

Joly 1964) resulted in a growing number of new species. Results of<br />

a lifetime study on <strong>Alternaria</strong> taxonomy based upon morphological<br />

characteristics were summarised in Simmons (2007), in which 275<br />

<strong>Alternaria</strong> species were recognised. One species was transferred<br />

to the genus Prathoda and three new genera, <strong>Alternaria</strong>ster,<br />

Chalastospora and Teretispora, were segregated from <strong>Alternaria</strong>.<br />

Molecular studies revealed multiple non-monophyletic genera<br />

within the <strong>Alternaria</strong> complex and <strong>Alternaria</strong> species clades,<br />

which do not always correlate to species-groups based upon<br />

morphological characteristics (Pryor & Gilbertson 2000, Chou &<br />

Wu 2002, de Hoog & Horré 2002, Pryor & Bigelow 2003, Hong<br />

et al. 2005, Inderbitzin et al. 2006, Pryor et al. 2009, Runa et al.<br />

2009, Wang et al. 2011, Lawrence et al. 2012). The A. alternata,<br />

A. brassicicola, A. infectoria, A. porri and A. radicina speciesgroups<br />

were strongly supported by these studies and two new<br />

species-groups, A. sonchi (Hong et al. 2005) and A. alternantherae<br />

(Lawrence et al. 2012) and three new genera, Crivellia (Inderbitzin<br />

et al. 2006), Undifilum (Pryor et al. 2009) and Sinomyces (Wang et<br />

al. 2011), were described. The latest molecular revision of <strong>Alternaria</strong><br />

(Lawrence et al. 2013) introduced two new species groups, A.<br />

panax and A. gypsophilae, and elevated eight species-groups<br />

to sections within <strong>Alternaria</strong>. The sexual phylogenetic <strong>Alternaria</strong><br />

lineage, the A. infectoria species-group, did not get the status of<br />

section, in contrast to the eight asexual phylogenetic lineages in<br />

<strong>Alternaria</strong>. The <strong>Alternaria</strong> complex currently comprises the genera<br />

<strong>Alternaria</strong>, Chalastospora (Simmons 2007), Crivellia, Embellisia,<br />

Nimbya, Stemphylium, Ulocladium, Undifilum and the recently<br />

described Sinomyces together with eight sections of <strong>Alternaria</strong> and<br />

the A. infectoria species-group.<br />

The aim of the present study was to delineate the phylogenetic<br />

lineages within <strong>Alternaria</strong> and allied genera, and to create a robust<br />

taxonomy. Phylogenetic inferences were conducted on sequence<br />

data of parts of the 18S nrDNA (SSU), 28S nrDNA (LSU), the<br />

internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 and intervening<br />

5.8S nrDNA (ITS), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase<br />

(GAPDH), RNA polymerase second largest subunit (RPB2) and<br />

translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1) gene regions of extype<br />

and reference strains of <strong>Alternaria</strong> species and all available<br />

allied genera.<br />

MATERIAL AND METHODS<br />

Isolates<br />

Based on the ITS sequences of all ex-type or representative<br />

strains from the <strong>Alternaria</strong> identification manual present at the<br />

<strong>CBS</strong>-<strong>KNAW</strong> Fungal Biodiversity Centre (<strong>CBS</strong>), Utrecht, The<br />

Netherlands (data not shown), 66 <strong>Alternaria</strong> strains were included<br />

in this study together with 61 ex-type or representative strains of 16<br />

related genera (Table 1). <strong>Alternaria</strong> is represented by the ex-type<br />

or representative strains of the seven species-groups and species<br />

that clustered outside known <strong>Alternaria</strong> clades. Because of the<br />

size and complexity of the A. alternata, A. infectoria and A. porri<br />

species-groups, we only included known species; the complete<br />

species-groups will be treated in future studies.<br />

Freeze-dried strains were revived in 2 mL malt/peptone (50 %<br />

/ 50 %) and subsequently transferred to oatmeal agar (OA) (Crous<br />

et al. 2009a). Strains of the <strong>CBS</strong> collection stored in liquid nitrogen<br />

were transferred to OA directly from -80 ºC. DNA extraction was<br />

performed using the UltraClean Microbial DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio<br />

laboratories, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s<br />

instructions.<br />

Taxonomy<br />

Morphological descriptions were made for isolates grown on<br />

synthetic nutrient-poor agar plates (SNA, Nirenberg 1976) with a<br />

small piece of autoclaved filter paper placed onto the agar surface.<br />

Cultures were incubated at moderate temperatures (~ 22 ºC)<br />

under CoolWhite fluorescent light with an 8 h photoperiod for 7 d.<br />

The sellotape technique was used for making slide preparations<br />

(Crous et al. 2009a) with Shear’s medium as mounting fluid.<br />

Photographs of characteristic structures were made with a Nikon<br />

Eclipse 80i microscope using differential interference contrast<br />

(DIC) illumination. Growth rates were measured after 5 and 7 d.<br />

Colony characters were noted after 7 d, colony colours were rated<br />

according to Rayner (1970). Nomenclatural data were deposited in<br />

MycoBank (Crous et al. 2004).<br />

PCR and sequencing<br />

The SSU region was amplified with the primers NS1 and NS4 (White<br />

et al. 1990), the LSU region with LSU1Fd (Crous et al. 2009b) and<br />

LR5 (Vilgalys & Hester 1990), the ITS region with V9G (De Hoog<br />

& Gerrits van den Ende 1998) and ITS4 (White et al. 1990), the<br />

GAPDH region with gpd1 and gpd2 (Berbee et al. 1999), the RPB2<br />

region with RPB2–5F2 (Sung et al. 2007) and fRPB2–7cR (Liu et<br />

al. 1999) and the TEF1 gene with the primers EF1-728F and EF1-<br />

986R (Carbone & Kohn 1999) or EF2 (O’Donnell et al. 1998). The<br />

PCRs were performed in a MyCycler TM Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad<br />

Laboratories B.V., Veenendaal, The Netherlands) in a total volume<br />

of 12.5 µL. The SSU and LSU PCR mixtures consisted of 1 µL<br />

genomic DNA, 1´ GoTaq® Flexi buffer (Promega, Madison, WI,<br />

USA), 2 µM MgCl 2<br />

, 40 µM of each dNTP, 0.2 µM of each primer<br />

and 0.25 Unit GoTaq® Flexi DNA polymerase (Promega). The<br />

ITS and GAPDH PCR mixtures differed from the original mix by<br />

containing 1 µM MgCl 2<br />

, the RPB2 and TEF1 PCR mixtures differed<br />

from the original mix by containing 2 µL genomic DNA and the<br />

RPB2 mixture differed from the original mix by containing 0.5 U<br />

instead of 0.25 U GoTaq® Flexi DNA polymerase. Conditions for<br />

PCR amplification consisted of an initial denaturation step of 5 min<br />

at 94 ºC followed by 35 cycles of 30 s at 94 ºC, 30 s at 48 ºC and<br />

90 s at 72 ºC for SSU, LSU, ITS and 40 cycles of 30 s at 94 ºC, 30<br />

s at 52 ºC / 59 ºC and 45 s at 72 ºC for TEF1 using respectively<br />

EF2 or EF1-986R as reverse primer and a final elongation step of<br />

7 min at 72 ºC. The partial RPB2 gene was obtained by using a<br />

touchdown PCR protocol of 5 cycles of 45 s at 94 ºC, 45 s at 60<br />

ºC and 2 min at 72 ºC, followed by 5 cycles with a 58 ºC annealing<br />

temperature and 30 cycles with a 54 ºC annealing temperature.<br />

The PCR products were sequenced in both directions using the<br />

PCR primers and the BigDye Terminator v. 3.1 Cycle Sequencing<br />

Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), according to<br />

the manufacturer’s recommendations, and analysed with an ABI<br />

Prism 3730XL Sequencer (Applied Biosystems) according to the<br />

manufacturer’s instructions. Consensus sequences were computed<br />

from forward and reverse sequences using the BioNumerics v. 4.61<br />

software package (Applied Maths, St-Martens-Latem, Belgium). All<br />

generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).<br />

172

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!