18.11.2012 Views

HCJ 10650/03 Abu Gwella et. al v

HCJ 10650/03 Abu Gwella et. al v

HCJ 10650/03 Abu Gwella et. al v

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116. The duty of a parent to his children and the prohibition on neglecting them are firmly<br />

established in Israeli Law. For example, Section 15 of the Capacity and Guardianship<br />

Law, 5722 – 1962, whose heading is “functions of parents,” states:<br />

The guardianship of the parent sh<strong>al</strong>l include the duty and<br />

the right to take care of the needs of the minor, including his<br />

education, studies, vocation<strong>al</strong> and occupation<strong>al</strong> training and<br />

work, and to preserve, manage and develop his property; it<br />

sh<strong>al</strong>l <strong>al</strong>so include the right to the custody of the minor and<br />

to d<strong>et</strong>ermine his place of residence and the authority to act<br />

on his beh<strong>al</strong>f.<br />

Section 323 of the Pen<strong>al</strong> Law, 5737 – 1977, states:<br />

It is the duty of a parent or person who has responsibility<br />

for a minor, being a member of his household, to provide<br />

the necessaries of life for such minor, to care for his he<strong>al</strong>th<br />

and to prevent him being abused or from suffering physic<strong>al</strong><br />

injury or other harm to his well-being and he<strong>al</strong>th, and is<br />

held to have caused any consequences which result to the<br />

life or he<strong>al</strong>th of the minor by reason of not fulfilling the said<br />

duty.<br />

See, further, Section 373 of the Pen<strong>al</strong> Law.<br />

117. The Law prevents the parent from acting in accordance with these duties. Thus, the<br />

Law forces the parents into being lawbreakers.. Even worse, the Law thwarts the<br />

primary soci<strong>et</strong><strong>al</strong> entity to protect the person, life, and dignity of children.<br />

The harm is especi<strong>al</strong>ly grave in that, <strong>al</strong>ong with enactment of the Law, the state<br />

restricts the entry of Israelis into P<strong>al</strong>estinian population centers in the Gaza Strip and<br />

the West Bank.<br />

The right to equ<strong>al</strong>ity<br />

118. In revoking the discr<strong>et</strong>ion of the Minister of the Interior to arrange the status of<br />

residents’ children born in the Occupied Territories, the Respondents unlawfully<br />

discriminate and do not provide equ<strong>al</strong> treatment to Israeli residents of Arab descent<br />

married to <strong>al</strong>iens in comparison with other residents of Israel, who live in Israel and<br />

outside its municip<strong>al</strong> borders. In this context, it should be emphasized that the status of<br />

these persons is not acquired as a result of their arriv<strong>al</strong> and s<strong>et</strong>tlement in Israel by free<br />

choice (such as pilgrims, Black Hebrews, and the like). Rather, Israel made them<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!